Topic: there’s a reason aristocrats developed weak chins
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #42,001
The world is changing.... there’s a reason aristocrats developed weak chins.
What does the above even mean
What does the above even mean
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #558,063
I think its a beheading joke?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #558,065
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #558,068
I think it means that those who are pampered are weak and not ready to adapt to change. The same character also says "The lack of a silver spoon has set you on a certain path but you can change it. Have you seen Pretty woman? Trading Places? Nikita?"
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,140
Because they don't get into drunken bar brawls I guess.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,145
*democrats
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 57 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,147
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,148
Because inbred people have really weak chins. The aristocrats are all inbred because there are barely any of them left. Soon there will be none, and somebody else will take their place in power. The world is changing, and a man can make his power.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,150
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
It's strange that people make claims about the consanguinity of the more effective and eugenic elements of a population, yet I see little proof, and Metapedia certainly laughs at the notion.
It's strange that people make claims about the consanguinity of the more effective and eugenic elements of a population, yet I see little proof, and Metapedia certainly laughs at the notion.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,240
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,245
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 51 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,249
@previous (I)
Stupid fedoras like FuckAlms can push their Masonic, pseudo-"scientific" (Ziontific) 'peer-reviewed' ("Jew-approved") research monolith agenda on the Judeomasonically controlled Wikipedia leftist agitation apparatus until they're blue in the face for all I fucking care.
The fact remains that, although not registered and encodified in its recognition as 'real' by the internationalist agents of the worldwide information distribution control channels, what's more important is that it's an arbiter of coherent truths that do not omit, unlike Wikipedia, the context surrounding the development of modern, ZIONTIFIC phenomena, such as the aberro-sexual, aberro-gender, aberro-racial, and aberro-class-heirarchical/class-subversive agendas.
Stupid fedoras like FuckAlms can push their Masonic, pseudo-"scientific" (Ziontific) 'peer-reviewed' ("Jew-approved") research monolith agenda on the Judeomasonically controlled Wikipedia leftist agitation apparatus until they're blue in the face for all I fucking care.
The fact remains that, although not registered and encodified in its recognition as 'real' by the internationalist agents of the worldwide information distribution control channels, what's more important is that it's an arbiter of coherent truths that do not omit, unlike Wikipedia, the context surrounding the development of modern, ZIONTIFIC phenomena, such as the aberro-sexual, aberro-gender, aberro-racial, and aberro-class-heirarchical/class-subversive agendas.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,254
@previous (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)Metapedia isn't a real encyclopedia. It's an internet forum where any idiot, troll or delusional lunatic can post their unverifiable and unsourced opinions.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,255
@previous (I)
> internet forum
It runs on MediaWiki software. That's not conventional for a 'forum.'
> any idiot, troll or delusional lunatic
They're called meta-politicians.
> can post their unverifiable and unsourced
Sadly, that'll remain the case until the Jews release their stranglehold on academia.
> opinions
The history documented on Metapedia actually did happen, unlike the fiction written by the rubber-stamp approved 'academics' who spoonfeed their diarrhea down your throat, expecting you to swallow it as incontrovertible fact.
> internet forum
It runs on MediaWiki software. That's not conventional for a 'forum.'
> any idiot, troll or delusional lunatic
They're called meta-politicians.
> can post their unverifiable and unsourced
Sadly, that'll remain the case until the Jews release their stranglehold on academia.
> opinions
The history documented on Metapedia actually did happen, unlike the fiction written by the rubber-stamp approved 'academics' who spoonfeed their diarrhea down your throat, expecting you to swallow it as incontrovertible fact.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,256
@previous (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)It's an unconventional internet forum, but its still an internet forum. Opinions posted there carry no more weight than opinions posted an any other random messageboard.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,257
@previous (I)
No, it's conventional for an encyclopaedic resource, rather than a forum, and certainly isn't the same kind of platform for non-discussion as Wikipedia, where any liberal can spout their rubbish in narcissistic adulation of their mutually shared insanity.
Wikipedia loosely interprets its sources' notability and credibility criteria when a pet cause of theirs is lacking the verifiability for its promotion. I don't see how the quality of "opinionation" on Metapedia is substantially outdone in such an instance.
No, it's conventional for an encyclopaedic resource, rather than a forum, and certainly isn't the same kind of platform for non-discussion as Wikipedia, where any liberal can spout their rubbish in narcissistic adulation of their mutually shared insanity.
Wikipedia loosely interprets its sources' notability and credibility criteria when a pet cause of theirs is lacking the verifiability for its promotion. I don't see how the quality of "opinionation" on Metapedia is substantially outdone in such an instance.
(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,258
@previous (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)If Metapedia is a valid reference source solely because it runs on MediaWiki, so is Wikipedia.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,260
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 48 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,261
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,262
@previous (I)
Note: the manually published encyclopedias of old had no citation standards whatsoever.
It seems you change your functional definition of a credible encyclopedia (which by the standards you've set, would not include any of the classic sort) to suit yourself.
Note: the manually published encyclopedias of old had no citation standards whatsoever.
It seems you change your functional definition of a credible encyclopedia (which by the standards you've set, would not include any of the classic sort) to suit yourself.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
A Doctor replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,267
@previous (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)> Metapedia is an encyclopedia because I say it's an encyclopedia
I'm a doctor because I say I'm a doctor.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,270
@previous (A Doctor)
You were making a similar argument of authority earlier, proclaiming it to be unencyclopaedic because you had set arbitrary standards declaring it not to be, that I was meant to take upon your word for their legitimacy.
You were making a similar argument of authority earlier, proclaiming it to be unencyclopaedic because you had set arbitrary standards declaring it not to be, that I was meant to take upon your word for their legitimacy.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,294
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,296
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,300
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
I wasn't supposed to tell you this, but you were in the placebo group.
I wasn't supposed to tell you this, but you were in the placebo group.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 55 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,331
@558,294 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Note comparative 'like' before your name; you were cited in example rather than personally.
Note comparative 'like' before your name; you were cited in example rather than personally.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,349
@previous (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Yes but it implies that I have something in common with the statement to follow, which likens me to a jewish puppet.
While I may not be directly worried about jewish conspiracies to the extent you are, I do think Israel has a great deal to answer for considering the amount of foreign aid they receive from the US government.
Yes but it implies that I have something in common with the statement to follow, which likens me to a jewish puppet.
While I may not be directly worried about jewish conspiracies to the extent you are, I do think Israel has a great deal to answer for considering the amount of foreign aid they receive from the US government.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,356
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I'm very drunk from beer.
@558,331 (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Fuck you and your conspiracies. Solve the conspiracy of why my ice cubes haven't frozen you cunt.
I'm very drunk from beer.
@558,331 (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Fuck you and your conspiracies. Solve the conspiracy of why my ice cubes haven't frozen you cunt.
A Doctor replied with this 11 years ago, 36 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,365
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,379
@558,254 (I)
> Metapedia isn't a real encyclopedia. It's an internet forum where any idiot, troll or delusional lunatic can post their unverifiable and unsourced opinions.
dont post here faggot
> Metapedia isn't a real encyclopedia. It's an internet forum where any idiot, troll or delusional lunatic can post their unverifiable and unsourced opinions.
dont post here faggot
A Doctor replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #558,390
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 11 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #558,634
@558,349 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Reading the Elders of Zion was like being returned to my childhood when I'd be told superstitious nonsense to keep me on a path of straighthood. It certainly did set me astray of communism forever thereafter, knowing my betrayal at the hands of Occupy Edinburgh.
Reading the Elders of Zion was like being returned to my childhood when I'd be told superstitious nonsense to keep me on a path of straighthood. It certainly did set me astray of communism forever thereafter, knowing my betrayal at the hands of Occupy Edinburgh.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 months later, 6 months after the original post[^] [v] #628,093
You limey fucks make me feel like riverdancin!
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 months after the original post[^] [v] #628,123
because their ancestors didn't have to chew on shoe leather to survive
beckyderp !TInYDicKMI joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 years later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #980,089
i don't understand the bots on this one
Anonymous G replied with this 7 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #980,094
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #980,143
Becky's Butt joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #980,145
@558,356 (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
> Fuck you and your conspiracies. Solve the conspiracy of why my ice cubes haven't frozen you cunt.
nice
> Fuck you and your conspiracies. Solve the conspiracy of why my ice cubes haven't frozen you cunt.
nice