Minichan

Topic: FAO Democrats: What is Hillary supposed to accomplish that Obama didnt?

Metæ started this discussion 11 years ago #41,903

???

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 28 seconds later[^] [v] #556,754

Being the first female president.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #556,755

kys

Metæ (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,756

@previous (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
That was unnecessarily rude. I simply do not see how she's different. If her campaign promise is "stay the course" that's fine: Bush 1 and Al Gore ran on a stay the course platform and it was what was expected: ie if it aint broke don't fix it. I just ask because Obama 08 was about change in so many ways but I don't see Hillary meaningfully differentiating herself from Obama. Am I missing it or am I looking at it the wrong way?

(Edited 1 minute later.)

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,758

@previous (Metæ)
idk dude

Marsden William "Bill" Miller joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 49 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,759

> expecting all democrats to explain one candidate that the establishment and corporate interests happen to strongly support

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Metæ (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 28 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,761

@556,758 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Thank you.
@556,754 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Warren would have brought the same advantage but with better populist credentials, imo.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,762

@556,759 (Marsden William "Bill" Miller)
didn't make any sense

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,764

@556,761 (Metæ)
Better "populist credentials" = less chance of winning vs. a repub in the general election. Not to mention Hillary has an absurd lead in the primaries over literally every other candidate. I can't remember the last time a non-incumbent held a 50 point lead over their competitors in the primaries.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q replied with this 11 years ago, 50 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,765

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
repug*

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,766

@556,762 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Well what else would you expect from someone who is genetically responsible for matt?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 11 years ago, 39 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,768

@556,765 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
ad hominem

Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,773

@OP
Not much IF she is elected with Republicans owning the Senate and House.
Lots IF she can does not end up blocked like Obama.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,774

i have no interest in this upcoming election. it's still way to far off and nothing really matter as far as i'm concerned until about a week or so before. flip on the news, get a recap of all the stupid fucking election drama, hear what lies the bastards are promising us this time and i'll probably vote based on whoever is younger

Metæ (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,776

@556,765 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Rethug*

Metæ (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,777

@556,755 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
I'm sorry for offending you. I'm not trying to troll Democrats or dis Hillary or the DNC or anything. I'm not excited about either major party and will be voting Libertarian, as always. Though I must say the Republican party has gone off the deep end the past couple decades

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 45 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,778

@556,774 (squeegee)
Looked at the looong list of Republicans and ages. Couple of names no one has heard of are younger then your Ted Cruz but no one has heard of them. Most are in 60's or kissing close2

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #556,780

@556,777 (Metæ)
It's okay, you're forgiven!

hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 48 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #556,787

bernie sanders 2016 bitch

Marsden William "Bill" Miller replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #556,813

@previous (hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs)

> bernie sanders 2016 bitch

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #556,876

@OP
ask the people in #hillary2016 on rizon

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #556,878

being a fat bitch

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #556,879

She will accomplish free healthcare. The rich, white Conservatives will hate the fact that dying people will get help, but normal humans actually want that.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.