Topic: why is england still a monarchy? only post itt if you are from the uk
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #41,810
when queen elizabeth dies is that it? is prince charles going to be prince forever? will they dismantle buckingham palace and distribute it amongst the population?
and furthermore why are british people so goddamn ugly?
and furthermore why are british people so goddamn ugly?
r04r joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #555,541
the netherlands is a monarchy too
yellowbelly joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,542
Racist.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,543
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,545
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,547
@previous (r04r)
> you seem retarded
why? because i asked why england is still a monarchy? if i was curious as to why denmark was still a monarchy i would have made a thread about it. whats your fuckin problem?
> you seem retarded
why? because i asked why england is still a monarchy? if i was curious as to why denmark was still a monarchy i would have made a thread about it. whats your fuckin problem?
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 16 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,548
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 35 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,550
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 24 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,551
@555,548 (r04r)
> no, just in the general sense
i dont think you understand what "retarded" means which is ironic because you're putting yourself on grand display, fake r04r
> no, just in the general sense
i dont think you understand what "retarded" means which is ironic because you're putting yourself on grand display, fake r04r
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,555
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,558
@previous (r04r)
> > when queen elizabeth dies is that it? is prince charles going to be prince forever?
will he become a king? its a legitimate question, fuck off fake r04r.
> > when queen elizabeth dies is that it? is prince charles going to be prince forever?
will he become a king? its a legitimate question, fuck off fake r04r.
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 20 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,560
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,563
@previous (r04r)
> yes, that is how their monarchy works
this may come as a shock to you but the king of england died ages ago
> click my name
suck my dick
> yes, that is how their monarchy works
this may come as a shock to you but the king of england died ages ago
> click my name
suck my dick
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,565
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 17 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,566
@OP
She's really more of a figurehead, bud. Doesn't really get involved with state matters too directly.
@555,560 (r04r)
Does Minichan have a similar system in place? If you die, who takes over?
She's really more of a figurehead, bud. Doesn't really get involved with state matters too directly.
@555,560 (r04r)
Does Minichan have a similar system in place? If you die, who takes over?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 7 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,567
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,571
@previous (A)
mad. in any case since you genuinely dont seem to know: there is one ruling monarch, in this case queen elizabeth. she was the eldest child of the previous ruling monarch (George VI). Her eldest child is prince charles, who will become king once she dies. She does cannot resign, which monarchs in the netherlands can.
mad. in any case since you genuinely dont seem to know: there is one ruling monarch, in this case queen elizabeth. she was the eldest child of the previous ruling monarch (George VI). Her eldest child is prince charles, who will become king once she dies. She does cannot resign, which monarchs in the netherlands can.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 50 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,573
@555,566 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> She's really more of a figurehead, bud. Doesn't really get involved with state matters too directly.
thats what i thought but it seems like that the whole thing would have been done away with ages ago
> She's really more of a figurehead, bud. Doesn't really get involved with state matters too directly.
thats what i thought but it seems like that the whole thing would have been done away with ages ago
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,575
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,576
r04r double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,580
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 40 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,582
@555,571 (r04r)
> She does cannot resign, which monarchs in the netherlands can.
She can. It's called abdication.
> She does cannot resign, which monarchs in the netherlands can.
She can. It's called abdication.
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,585
@previous (D)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdication#British_and_Commonwealth_history
> Today, because the title to the Crown depends upon statute, particularly the Act of Settlement 1701, a royal abdication can only be effected by an Act of Parliament; under the terms of the Statute of Westminster 1931, such an act must be agreed by the parliaments of all extant signatories of the Statute. To give legal effect to the abdication of King Edward VIII, His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 was passed.
Not really
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdication#British_and_Commonwealth_history
> Today, because the title to the Crown depends upon statute, particularly the Act of Settlement 1701, a royal abdication can only be effected by an Act of Parliament; under the terms of the Statute of Westminster 1931, such an act must be agreed by the parliaments of all extant signatories of the Statute. To give legal effect to the abdication of King Edward VIII, His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 was passed.
Not really
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 41 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,587
@555,573 (A)
Nah. Generally, the royal family well-liked. They're seen as a national symbol.
@555,580 (r04r)
Thought so.
Okay, then how many Minichanners would need to die before Green assumed power?
Nah. Generally, the royal family well-liked. They're seen as a national symbol.
@555,580 (r04r)
Thought so.
Okay, then how many Minichanners would need to die before Green assumed power?
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 23 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,588
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,590
@555,587 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Nah. Generally, the royal family well-liked. They're seen as a national symbol.
>
>
> Thought so.
>
> Okay, then how many Minichanners would need to die before Green assumed power?
green is a fuckin god, he can assume power any time he wants, he exists in the fifth dimension
> Nah. Generally, the royal family well-liked. They're seen as a national symbol.
>
>
> Thought so.
>
> Okay, then how many Minichanners would need to die before Green assumed power?
green is a fuckin god, he can assume power any time he wants, he exists in the fifth dimension
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 22 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,592
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 59 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,594
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
They're all in the peasants pool, so all of the nobility has to die and the peasants will revolt. What happens then, is up to them.
They're all in the peasants pool, so all of the nobility has to die and the peasants will revolt. What happens then, is up to them.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #555,598
@previous (r04r)
Right, right, that makes sense.
So the Minichan nobility is all of the moderators, I assume? Are well-known but un-modded namefags a sort of middle class?
Right, right, that makes sense.
So the Minichan nobility is all of the moderators, I assume? Are well-known but un-modded namefags a sort of middle class?