> why would someone interested in film watch interstellar. that's like asking a music buff what the think of the new hollywood undead album
You implied film buffery. Thanks.
hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#554,367
@previous (A)
i didn't imply anything. words have no inherent meaning
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#554,370
@previous (hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs)
Then I shall ignore your words and continue to infer that your're, in fact, at this very moment, engaged in, and consumed by, paroxysms of autistic-tier film buffery that border on full-blown cinephilia. Thanks.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#554,372
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#554,377
@previous (hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs)
Then why did I just imagine you saying that in French, complete with a stereotypical Gallic shrug, while wearing sunglasses indoors and smoking an unfiltered Galoises?
hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#554,378
@previous (A)
your're projecting your're inner film snob onto me
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#554,626