Minichan

Topic: Hey Minichan Atheists

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #41,610

Fucking rekt

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #552,825

@OP
[citation needed]

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 50 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #552,827

Oh, well it is in picture form. And it says there was a global study. It must be true, then.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #552,832

@previous (C)
Yea, plus they always say everything you read on the internet is true.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #552,836

@552,825 (B)
@552,827 (C)
@previous (D)
All this denial

Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #552,839

@OP
Someone asked you for a citation and you failed. I had no clue but do now

Rieke Havertz (2012-08-15). "Atheism on the rise around the globe". CSMonitor.com.

According to the 2012 Gallup International survey, the number of atheists is on the rise across the world, with religiosity generally declining.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #552,855

@previous (Syntax)
> World Will Get More Religious by 2050
http://www.livescience.com/50370-worlds-religious-population-will-grow.html

> The World Is Getting More Religious
http://time.com/3769287/religion-atheists-study/

> The world is expected to become more religious — not less
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/04/24/the-world-is-expected-to-become-more-religious-not-less/

Those are some fairly good sources I have there. I could go on.

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #552,856

From your first citation

The United States is an exception, where more Americans are expected to flee organized religion.


Or in other words if religion does grow its due to population explosion among the Rag Heads and I doubt anyone here thinks Allah n head chopping off equates to any real religion of any value.

Oh Wait the 2nd link is again the same Pew study as 1st link - Did ye expect me to NOT double triple check? Nice try.

Oh WOW 3rd link is rehash of 1st n 2nd as in EXACTLY THE SAME With Rag Heads cranking out more kiddlets which automatically makes for more Head Chopping off Rag Heads.

Now I doubt Pew is about to forecast how the Rag Head with keep killing Christians which might end up a net zero sum gain.

> Those are some fairly good sources I have there. I could go on.

Wot wot Wot? You only provided one source regurgitated.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #552,859

@previous (Syntax)

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/03/why-people-with-no-religion-are-projected-to-decline-as-a-share-of-the-worlds-population/

> Why people with no religion are projected to decline as a share of the world’s population

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #552,865

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
Again with the same Pew study.

To be clear, the total number of religiously unaffiliated people (which includes atheists, agnostics and those who say they have no particular religion on censuses and surveys)

is expected to rise, from 1.1 billion in 2010 to 1.2 billion in 2050. But this growth is projected to occur at the same time that other religious groups – and the global population overall – are growing faster.


OP I assume you are Christian? If so get a neck collar made out of hard cold steel. Or R U prepared to be Suni or Shiite? Muslims are coming after you to chop off your head because you are heathen.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #552,870

@previous (Syntax)


> Study: World Is Turning More Religious; Atheism Declining
http://www.christianpost.com/news/study-world-is-turning-more-religious-atheism-declining-100518/#y6W3zICdJCKxJwHL.99

I think Muslims are more interested in killing Jews first.

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,877

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
> "If this trend continues, agnostics and atheists will be a smaller portion of the world's population in 2020 than they were in 2010," says the report.

Again the same exact Pew numbers YET that source does not even Credit Pew - Other then saying a study says

Jews? .23% as if this makes any difference - Your religion is frankly on the CHOPPING BLOCK

So lets bottom line this. Hindus are cranking out kiddlets along with Muslims. I am not saying YOU are Wrong re more of THEM then those who are non believers - Yet Hindus do not believe in your God.

Muslims believe Your God might be there God but your Jesus is a Jew so good luck. Also you're an infidel in the eyes of Head Chopping off Muslims.

Catholics are Supposed to be fruitful and multiply n not use modern birth control. Yet they ignore the Pope. Pew is betting on the chance Chinese turn towards Jesus? Might? I don't have a clue frankly. Commie Christians? LoL

Atheism might be declining - then again wot it gets replaced with is Muslim or Commie Christians. Good luck.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,882

@previous (Syntax)
> How the world's religious landscape will look in 2050: Islam will become America's second-largest religion as the percentage of atheists across the globe will fall
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3030195/How-world-s-religious-landscape-look-2050-Islam-America-s-second-largest-religion-percentage-atheists-globe-fall.html

I can keep pumping out sources all day buddy.

Might I also remind you, you live in a Christain country and you live well. Be very worried because it's the Christains who protect you.

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,899

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
> Statistics revealed by the Pew Research Center

Again with the very same EXACT Source You only keep pumping out the one source.

> Islam will become America's second-largest religion

And no doubt will over take Christians as they continue to chop off heads. Christians not so much so good at making babies - Muslims very good at.

> Might I also remind you, you live in a Christain country and you live well. Be very worried because it's the Christains who protect you.

Here and its more like a 25 mile zone - The huge mass of H1B Visas end up accounting for me being surrounded by a huge number of Muslims and Asians. Muslims not so much so happy with me eating as much pork as I do. I dare not share how often they have shared plates of Gyoza stuffed with pork which is a common appetizer when I give a Bar-B-Q. I make sure the spare ribs are on a 2nd grill as to not offend them. Next door Neighbors at the SRF Church are of course mostly Hindu of origin

So again if Pew is correct its is YOU not me who should be worried cause your head is on the block. Mine as well if Muslims at my parties find out about the Pork Gyoza - I also buy the Incredible Trader Joes Shrimp Gyozas aka Thai types. Pork tends to be Muslims most Fav

(Edited 43 seconds later.)

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,905

@previous (Syntax)

> Survey: Islam Will Become World’s Largest Religion in 2070
http://www.voanews.com/content/survey-islam-become-world-largest-religion/2741077.html

Well here's another source.

And I know Islam might well be the largest religion. The point of my OP was to laugh at atheists who think they are right. Atheism is just a fad for teenagers and loosers hooked on the internet.

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,911

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
> Well here's another source.
LOLOLOL Its Pew again. With Muslim Rag Heads some day ending up as #1 which is frankly easy to agree with.

> point of my OP was to laugh at atheists who think they are right.

And your counterpoint is go hand them the growing alternative of giving them a choice of use of left hand as toilet paper - No Baby back pork ribs. Ending up in a family planned marriage to some ugly girl and constant wars among the various branches of Muslims.

You fail to support the smart Atheists yet support the retarded Muslims - You expect the Atheists to temporarily hang in with those in2 Jesus who expects them to participate in the Christian act of Cannibalism of drinking Jesus's blood and eating the body of Christ.

Oh by the way I plan on such as in June its again the first of the season Greek Festival where I will dig in the baskets of Jesus chunks of quality Greek Bread but have to pay my way for the Blood of Christ Vino.

Anon Z replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,912

@552,905 (Syntax is wrong again)

> Atheism is just a fad for teenagers and loosers hooked on the internet.

Apparently, you bible thumpers are "LOSERS"(you're welcome, I corrected your shitty spelling for you) hooked on the internet.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,934

@552,911 (Syntax)

> Decades from now, Christians and Muslims may account for two-thirds of the global population—suggesting that not all societies are becoming more secular.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/islam-could-become-the-worlds-largest-religion-after-2070/389210/

This source clearly states that NOT ALL societies are becoming more secular!

> smart Atheists
Oh please. If they are so smart how come no one wants to join them? If they were smart people would be leaving religions to join their ranks but rather people are going back to religion.

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,943

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
Again with Pew as your only source. Just copypasta.

Who can predict what the world will look like in 55 years? If there's one group willing to go boldly forth into the statistical unknown, it's demographers. Armed with regressions, piles of data, and many a chart, the researchers at Pew have projected that after 2070, the world's Muslims will outnumber the world's Christians.


> > smart Atheists
> Oh please. If they are so smart how come no one wants to join them? If they were smart people would be leaving religions to join their ranks but rather people are going back to religion.

The Pew study makes it clear and much can happen b4 2070 so its just speculation -

Now you discount Atheists as not so much so smart?

Atheists may not grow a the same rate only because Commie Chinese may adopt Chowing down on Body of Christ? OR they could just end up with Buddha

You give Atheists the choice of joining the ultimate winner the Muslims. Wot exactly do Muslims offer Atheists?

Why should Atheists become Rag Heads? Why are you a Christian supporting the Rag Head Position?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,945

This doesn't seem right when the world seems to be opening up more to logic and reason.
I do feel fearful about the coming Muslim dark ages though.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,951

@552,943 (Syntax)
> Damn — the world’s becoming more religious
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/jugglebandhi/damn-the-worlds-becoming-more-religious/

I don't care for Muslims, at least they are not atheists who try to disprove God and then look silly.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,957

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
#EuthanizeTheFaithful

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,959

@552,951 (Syntax is wrong again)
> However, the saffron brigade can take heart from the fact, contained in the same study, that by 2050 Hindus will constitute the world’s third- largest population in terms of religious faith, growing by >34% worldwide to reach 1.4 billion from the current 1 billion. By doing so, Hindus will replace the ‘unaffiliated’ group – people who pay allegiance to no particular creed – in third position, >constituting 14.9% of the global population.

Again with Pew. Hindus and Muslims.
> I don't care for Muslims, at least they are not atheists who try to disprove God and then look silly.

Again I ask wot do you have to offer Atheists?

Proof your brand of God is pure crap that offers nothing to Atheists.
2001 world trade center attack - Muslims prayed to their brand of God for success on Sep 11th
Christians watching this on TV when the 2nd plane was coming in live on camera - they prayed - even some Jews prayed to same God. Muslims won Christians n Jews lost.

Proof prayer if it works only works for Rag Heads. You have nada to offer Atheists. You the one who ends up looking silly. And your Jesus asks God to get him off the Wood. God no pay attention but then again its a fairy tale God so of course Prayer fails.

You only offer Atheists a Fairy Tale. I do enjoy Disney fairy tales like Snow White.

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #552,994

@552,951 (Syntax is wrong again)

> I don't care for Muslims, at least they are not atheists who try to disprove God and then look silly.

We don't disprove god, we just disprove that you have no "actual FACTS" that god exists.

Every time I ask one of you religious fuckheads, "If god created the heavens and the earth, who created God?" You guys have the same lame excuse, "No one created god, he has always been here."

Show me actual facts, facts, facts, that he created everything. If you can't, shut the fuck up and go become a raghead.

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,000

@previous (D)
That's not a lame excuse. For us it's all about faith, just because it's lame for you doesn't mean it's lame for us. You are not the center of the earth, nor is your group

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,007

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
So in other words, you're living off hope and faith that he exists? So you have no actual "FACTS."

Thanks

Syntax is wrong again (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,008

@previous (D)
I never claimed to have facts. As I wrote, it's all about faith and that's all we need. I'm happy you're content to believe what you believe based on facts than change your mind when the facts change but that's not my path. Thanks

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,010

@previous (Syntax is wrong again)
You've already admitted by your own words, that you, and your "group" have no actual facts to back up your theory of said god.

Therefore, all of your arguments are now invalid.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,012

@553,008 (Syntax is wrong again)
> As I wrote, it's all about faith and that's all we need

When I was a child I believed in the tooth fairy. At least money under my pillow verified the tooth fairy existed. Then I grew up and discovered the fairy tale.

God? Enjoy your silly fairy tail.

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,013

Externally hosted imageA pitiful attempt. Far better trolls have come before you.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 59 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #553,032

did someone say "proof of God's existence?"

oh. no. no one said that. bye.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #553,367

@previous (squeegee)

> did someone say "proof of God's existence?"
>
> oh. no. no one said that. bye.

banana

aka atheist nightmare

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #553,474

@previous (I)
No, obnoxious internet attention whore's worst nightmare.

Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #553,706

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)

Whoa, no need to be cheeky.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #553,765

@previous (Green)
I was talking about TAA's porn debacle. Did you think I meant you?

Green replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #553,875

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I did make the recent thread about the banana being the atheist's worst nightmare.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #553,895

@previous (Green)
Oh, I forgot about that. Yeah I meant the anti-theist on youtube parading as an atheist.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.