Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: why is prime minister chamberlain often remembered as a shameful prime minister?

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #41,202

He made a deal with hitler which then hitler broke, and some how this is seen as bad for him.

But wasn't the second world war worthy of such a desperate attempt to avoid it?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #547,781

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,782

Because he appeased Hitler which first of all encouraged Hitler to continue his aggressive expansion since there was not just "giving him a deal" but giving him what he wanted with no opposition, also it allowed Germany to start the Second World War in a position of power which they would not have otherwise been with intervention from the League of Nations

If he had been intervened against in his re-armament of the Rhineland then it could have suppressed German aggressiveness and averted the Second World War

so his policy of appeasement failed completely to keep the peace and in fact made it much worse

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,784

@OP
Chamberlain, gave Hitler a head start & fucked up by fail to prepare for war.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,785

@547,782 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)

Yeah clearly it was a gamble. But it seems like a worthy gamble to me

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,789

@previous (A)
> I do not see why this was bad
> Here is exactly why it was bad
> Okay but it was a worthy goal

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,790

@previous (E)

What i mean is that of course it had bad consequences but it was done to try and avoid greater consequences and much worse consequences. I think that with this in mind, Chamberlain can be forgiven.

Just because there are winners and losers in war, does not mean that the loser did everything wrong.

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,791

@previous (A)
Matthew Roosteet Miller.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,792

@previous (E)

Oh i am so won over now. You are great to argue with, making such great points.

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,796

@547,785 (A)

there were many better options that could have been taken

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #547,802

@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)

options to avoid world war? That is a lot of speculation, many opposing thoughts.

But i think chamberlain has been judged way to harshly and that you might as well blame the jews in the holocaust for getting caught up with hitler.

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #547,803

@previous (A)
> you might as well blame the jews in the holocaust for getting caught up with hitler.

Do you use that argument to justify women raped because they were asking for it? A Child molested because they were in the presence of the molester?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #547,805

@previous (D)

I do not at all use that argument. In fact, i was trying to point out the stupidity of that very same argument. It appears to me that chamberlain is subjected to that kind of argument.

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #547,809

@previous (A)
Chamberlain wasn't blind. Hitler withdraws from League of Nations. Violates the Versailles Treaty. Beefs up the Army and Airforce. Supports General Franco.
The list of preparations for a massive war are right before Chamberlains eyes. Chamberlain turns his back and becomes one more lesson on why history is taught in schools. (Not that this changes much)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #547,810

@previous (D)

Thats right man, he sees a world war coming and tries to prevent it. Fuck him right? Fucking asshole he is.

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #547,813

@previous (A)
Compare your support of Chamberlain to John Kennedy. Reports come in on Cuba installing Russian Missiles. In a very short time Kennedy stands up - takes action and Russia stops this shit and goes home.

I put down Chamberlain for the same reason the Owl did
> his policy of appeasement failed completely to keep the peace and in fact made it much worse

Its the made it much worse - So yes Chamberlain was a fucking asshole and even Hitler called Chamberlain exactly that

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #547,822

@previous (D)

> In a very short time Kennedy stands up - takes action and Russia stops this shit and goes home

Your forget the part where he determinately opposed nuclear war as suggested by key military officials
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.