Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago#40,911
Pretty mad, if any of the last few days posting is anything to go by.
Does anyone know why? I'm not asking kook this question, or wondering what her thoughts on this are. Any answer she gives would only be one sided, nasty, quarrelsome and belligerent anyway.
Does anyone really know what happened between these two? It also appears that the mods here have sided with kook, and at some other tranny forum they have sided with Catherine.
Jon F. Kelly of Philadelphia joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#544,135
I am bepuzzled. Kook seems like a hard person to not get along with.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,137
@previous (Jon F. Kelly of Philadelphia) > I am bepuzzled. Kook seems like a hard person to not get along with.
People she has personally chased off Minichan:
-Mountainman
-Cathy
BP is a force to be reckoned with. Do not make her angry or curious about you in any way. She's nice, but she's like the Internet's answer to Bruce Banner.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,138
@previous (C)
Do you know why she chased Cathy off?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 43 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,139
How have the mods sided with kook? You do realise that the thread about Catherine being banned was a joke, right?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,141
@544,138 (A)
I haven't the slightest idea. I rather enjoyed the occaisional Cathy thread, if only for the weird brand of Google naiveté and Airbender fandom Cathy brought us. I sort of miss Cathy. Chasing off Mountainman, on the other hand, was like Gandalf defeating Balrog; so three fucking cheers for bp there.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,143
@544,139 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Do you know the story? Can you post it here, or will you incur the wrath and therefore instead post a limp watered down version?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,144
@544,141 (C)
Did mountainman touch a young girl in his bible group? That is something I've seen posted about him, with a statist decadence catchphrase
Jon F. Kelly of Philadelphia replied with this 11 years ago, 58 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,145
@previous (A)
He taught her and fucked her, yes. She was 14.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,146
@544,144 (A)
Ad hominem. You are a decadent statist.
WSD !VBNtXmsnv. joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,147
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,149
@544,146 (C)
I'm not sure what you mean. An ad hominem is a fallacy in an argument, I was merely asking a question and now you just sound like an asshole.
@544,145 (Jon F. Kelly of Philadelphia)
That was the story I heard, was he boasting when he posted about it or something?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,150
@544,147 (WSD !VBNtXmsnv.)
That is not false dichotomy
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,151
@544,149 (A) > I'm not sure what you mean. An ad hominem is a fallacy in an argument, I was merely asking a question and now you just sound like an asshole.
> and now you just sound like an asshole.
Yeah... False dichotomy. You are decadent. Now you are feeling the true Mountainman experience.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#544,152
@previous (C)
Fucking a 14 year old is probably a better reason to run someone off, than just simple shitposting. Did Catherine post something in a similar way that set kook off?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#544,157
@previous (A) > Fucking a 14 year old is probably a better reason to run someone off, than just simple shitposting.
I think it was both. His shitposting was legendary.
> Did Catherine post something in a similar way that set kook off?
I don't think Catherine would be in a position to take advantage of children sexually by being their religious and educational superiors. (In contrast to Mountainman who was apparently going through Seminary and heading youth groups.) I honestly have no clue why Kook decided to post about Cathy's posts on the other forum. We were all curious about what she was saying, sure. I never minded Cathy's posts, and I don't have anything against her. She never really did anything here that was "over the line" except maybe make silly posts or complaining about not being a slave (WTF?), but that's not saying much given the random posts and strange opinions that get posted here.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#544,158
@previous (C)
Are you posting anonymously to protect yourself from kooks retribution? Honest question.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#544,159
@previous (A)
I've known buspuppie since TC. I think she's cool with me. We usually see things in a pretty similar light. I always post anon anyway.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#544,160
@previous (C)
Oh, ok. You always post anon and she's cool with you. That's not how anon posting works, bud.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#544,161
@previous (A)
Well, She really isn't that hard not to get along with, so... yeah most times I reply she seems pretty cool. It's not the namefagging so much as the content. I usually agree with the bulk of what she is saying. Any parts I don't agree with I try to argue logically. I think I'm the only one to constantly refer to her as bp, so maybe there's some continuity there. I don't know. I've been on the opposite side in a few threads, but I've never had any crazy arguments with her. Either facts are presented or we agree to disagree. Maybe "shadow-people"? I'm pretty skeptical about that shit, and she thinks she has seen them? That might be a point of contention. What you see is a pretty subjective thing though, so I can't tell her she didn't see something. But I can't bring myself to think I know more than my own experience and tell people that they they didn't actually see something. So... Meh. Yeah, we've always been pretty cool about stuff in posts across different forums no matter the user name.
r04r joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,174
> It also appears that the mods here have sided with kook, and at some other tranny forum they have sided with Catherine
No? We're pretty much partial.
This entire thing is absurd though. Catherine is being a huge crybaby and has been ignoring me, so I'm pretty much done caring either way.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,176
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,179
@544,174 (r04r)
The word is "impartial", btw. "Partial" means that you do favour one option over the others.
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,180
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Whoops, I shouldn't post soon after waking up. In any case I do think he's being pathetic so maybe I am partial???
Handel !XFpaTU3A5E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,183
He is being a cry baby there's no doubt about it. If you were partial he would be banned already.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,210
seems to me that catherine is the one that is mad considering he had to register at a private forum to whine and complain????? btw whats up catherine
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,216
@544,161 (C)
Omg lets talk about the shadow people! Are they time travelers? Am I seeing into different dimensions? Why do they act like I caught them doing something wrong?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 33 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,226
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Maybe they're from different time loops? Could they be Reptilians?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#544,232