Topic: is matt, a well known child molester, welcome in the US?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #40,322
Well?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | 3 | 23% | |
| no | 1 | 8% | |
| not wanted anywhere | 2 | 15% | |
| should just kill himself | 7 | 54% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #536,805
He's not a child molester
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,806
Syntax spread that around because he was reported to the fbi by Matt for harassing young teen girls in cardiff by the sea. The old fool was exposing himself to school girls
Not a big Matt supporter joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,809
I didn't think Matt could get close enough to young girls to molest them. Aside from some creepy Internet comments, is there evedence that he actually molested young girls?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,812
@536,805 (B)
> He's not a child molester
@previous (Not a big Matt supporter)
> I didn't think Matt could get close enough to young girls to molest them. Aside from some creepy Internet comments, is there evedence that he actually molested young girls?
He's not a child molester because he's a child rapist..
> He's not a child molester
@previous (Not a big Matt supporter)
> I didn't think Matt could get close enough to young girls to molest them. Aside from some creepy Internet comments, is there evedence that he actually molested young girls?
He's not a child molester because he's a child rapist..
Not a big Matt supporter replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,813
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,814
@previous (Not a big Matt supporter)
I'm not gonna be the one to disclose that information. If someone else wants to, they're more than welcome.
I'm not gonna be the one to disclose that information. If someone else wants to, they're more than welcome.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,816
@previous (E)
So, the same old lack of any evidence that syntax always posts because he is an obsessed old man with nothing in his life other than following Matt? I've read that many, many, times before...
So, the same old lack of any evidence that syntax always posts because he is an obsessed old man with nothing in his life other than following Matt? I've read that many, many, times before...
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,823
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,906
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 48 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,913
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,915
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,922
@536,809 (Not a big Matt supporter)
He asked a then 15 year old (IIRC) Triptych for open leg vulva and of course was obsessing over Emma Watson and Selena Gomez when they were teens. It's fair to say he's an ephebophile but as far as I know he's never expressed attraction to prepubescent girls or physically carried out his ephibophilic intentions. He's a sick fuck to be sure but "child molester" is a bit over the top IMO. Now Leo Vegas on the other hand...
He asked a then 15 year old (IIRC) Triptych for open leg vulva and of course was obsessing over Emma Watson and Selena Gomez when they were teens. It's fair to say he's an ephebophile but as far as I know he's never expressed attraction to prepubescent girls or physically carried out his ephibophilic intentions. He's a sick fuck to be sure but "child molester" is a bit over the top IMO. Now Leo Vegas on the other hand...
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,937
Syntax starts obsessively stalking someone when the other person gets the best of him.
When someone proves him wrong, its war for syntax.
When someone proves him wrong, its war for syntax.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,939
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,947
r04r joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,992
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 39 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #536,995
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #537,003
I have to wonder..... Syntax has been fairly quiet. I'm betting he has been around and posting anonymously. I wonder if he was the starter of this thread?!?!?!
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #537,146
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #537,234
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 1 week later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #539,853
Bump