Topic: Request: No bump option
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #40,246
Most chan websites have one at least, sage or "no bump".
Minichan should too.
Minichan should too.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #535,890
Bump
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #535,892
Sage wouldn't have any value on a slow moving board like this. Even if there was a sage option, a fully saged thread would be on the bumps page for 1-2 days and topics for up to 3.
WSDphone !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #535,897
What a great way to let to4str silently flood the board with CP.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #535,898
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #535,900
@535,897 (WSDphone !dBGi/iH4eY)
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It is for this reason I am able to fight a winning battle against spam on OTK.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It is for this reason I am able to fight a winning battle against spam on OTK.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #535,901
meh
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 40 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,905
Seems like it'd make it a lot harder for mods to keep track of spammers/people posting illegal content. I don't really see the value of it tbh.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,910
Someone really wants to have the last say in a thread. But in a secretive cowardly way. Makes perfect sense
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,957
Lothario Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,958
It is pronounced "sah-gay", not "sage" like the herb.
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,959
@previous (Lothario Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
But is it, praytell, in fact, literally, pronounced as one word?
But is it, praytell, in fact, literally, pronounced as one word?
Lothario Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2 replied with this 11 years ago, 34 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,960
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 30 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,961
Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,962
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 55 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,965
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,966
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 38 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,968
@535,960 (Lothario Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
You have to admit it was kind of pretentious to jump into a thread unbidden and start giving elocution lessons. Thanks.
You have to admit it was kind of pretentious to jump into a thread unbidden and start giving elocution lessons. Thanks.
dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,969
Green replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,971
dw replied with this 11 years ago, 51 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,972
r04r joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #535,976
@OP
@535,897 (WSDphone !dBGi/iH4eY)
This is why I've always been against implementing it here. It works for 4chan etc because threads expire there, but having people post stuff that goes unnoticed here seems like a bad idea. The only way it could works is with a lot of restrictions, but then I don't really see the worth. Sorry.
@535,897 (WSDphone !dBGi/iH4eY)
This is why I've always been against implementing it here. It works for 4chan etc because threads expire there, but having people post stuff that goes unnoticed here seems like a bad idea. The only way it could works is with a lot of restrictions, but then I don't really see the worth. Sorry.