Topic: Triptych, you have mentoined a "partner".
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #40,061
I take that to mean that you have a boy/girlfriend. How does he or she (or heshe) feel about the fact that you have tons of daily, casual sex with random, multiple people?
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #533,417
I don't have tons of daily, casual sex with random, multiple people therefore my partner feels nothing about it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #533,418
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #533,420
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #533,421
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
How does it make you feel being suddenly interrogated over your love life by a tax-dodging 40-year-old layabout?
How does it make you feel being suddenly interrogated over your love life by a tax-dodging 40-year-old layabout?
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #533,422
@previous (C)It makes me laugh! Matt's existence is kinda funny. Plus, look at this face. How could I not be getting laid?
/ego
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 33 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #533,426
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,428
@533,422 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
What if you walked in on him or her in the throes of orgasm with another human? Would you be jealous?
What if you walked in on him or her in the throes of orgasm with another human? Would you be jealous?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,429
@533,422 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
> How could I not be getting laid?
must be great having access to a time machine and constantly living in 2005 where people thought that labret and septum piercings were cool
> How could I not be getting laid?
must be great having access to a time machine and constantly living in 2005 where people thought that labret and septum piercings were cool
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,436
@previous (E)
Syntax claims to have given Triptych JAmes MAtthews™ DeLoreæ in exchange for inside info on Scatchan.
Syntax claims to have given Triptych JAmes MAtthews™ DeLoreæ in exchange for inside info on Scatchan.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,438
@533,429 (E)
They never stopped being cool. Must be great having access to a time machine and constantly living in 1805.
They never stopped being cool. Must be great having access to a time machine and constantly living in 1805.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,440
Anonymous C double-posted this 11 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,441
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #533,443
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,445
You're gross, Matt.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,446
@previous (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
No, no. He is a suave and charming gentleman. This is just playful banter. Honestly.
No, no. He is a suave and charming gentleman. This is just playful banter. Honestly.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,447
@533,441 (C)
> Labrets are cool. Nose piercings I'm not a fan of.
i bet you think eyebrow piercings are cool as well
> Labrets are cool. Nose piercings I'm not a fan of.
i bet you think eyebrow piercings are cool as well
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,450
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,452
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,453
@533,428 (A)
hmmm where have we seen this line of questioning, before?
@533,429 (E)
@533,443 (H)
> stop liking what I don't like
@533,446 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> open leg vulva
hmmm where have we seen this line of questioning, before?
@533,429 (E)
@533,443 (H)
> stop liking what I don't like
@533,446 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> open leg vulva
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,454
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,477
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,479
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,481
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,482
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,485
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,487
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,488
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
Sometimes it's convenient to sound like him, but we're digressing here. I thought you were just using Vocalon and didn't actually like him all that much. This has changed my opinion somewhat.
Sometimes it's convenient to sound like him, but we're digressing here. I thought you were just using Vocalon and didn't actually like him all that much. This has changed my opinion somewhat.
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,490
> mentoined
Master's degree, my ass.
Master's degree, my ass.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,491
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,493
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,500
Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,513
@533,450 (K)
Jealousy doesn't work in open relationships. Envy and compersion are more productive and practical.
Jealousy doesn't work in open relationships. Envy and compersion are more productive and practical.
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,516
Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,517
@previous (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Yeah! It's an odd word that's really only used in non-monogamous circles. Many spellchecks don't include it.
Yeah! It's an odd word that's really only used in non-monogamous circles. Many spellchecks don't include it.
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,522
@533,488 (K)
Used him? For what?
I was just a sad lonely kid, affection's always nice and I was getting little to none. It was a bad time. I guess that can be considered using someone, but it's a bit out of the conventional definition.
Used him? For what?
I was just a sad lonely kid, affection's always nice and I was getting little to none. It was a bad time. I guess that can be considered using someone, but it's a bit out of the conventional definition.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,523
@533,445 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
What is "gross" about this? It is a genuine question about open relationships. I cannot understand them.
What is "gross" about this? It is a genuine question about open relationships. I cannot understand them.
Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,526
@previous (A)
> genuine question
> pressing shtick about orgasmic ecstasy meant to offend
Pick one and only one.
> genuine question
> pressing shtick about orgasmic ecstasy meant to offend
Pick one and only one.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,537
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,558
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,643
Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 39 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,658
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,679
@533,422 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
You became an alt girl while I was away? Now that's quite something.
You became an alt girl while I was away? Now that's quite something.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,686
dachan-da replied with this 11 years ago, 55 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,690
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,709
@533,522 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
Yeah, that's what I meant - sought his attention and lapped it up but gave little in return. I think he thought because of that you liked him, and was hurt when he realized you didn't really.
@533,500 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
When one doesn't give a crap about having a meta-identity and wishes to remain anon. If people attribute my posts to him (as they often do) I really don't care, and neither does he I think.
Yeah, that's what I meant - sought his attention and lapped it up but gave little in return. I think he thought because of that you liked him, and was hurt when he realized you didn't really.
@533,500 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
When one doesn't give a crap about having a meta-identity and wishes to remain anon. If people attribute my posts to him (as they often do) I really don't care, and neither does he I think.
Anonymous K double-posted this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #533,712
@533,513 (L)
> compersion
That's an interesting word, and I agree having looked up its meaning. Anything on the altruistic/empathetic spectrum is good for relationships. Not so sure about envy, though I can see how it could be a positive attribute if paired with admiration.
> compersion
That's an interesting word, and I agree having looked up its meaning. Anything on the altruistic/empathetic spectrum is good for relationships. Not so sure about envy, though I can see how it could be a positive attribute if paired with admiration.
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #533,731
dachan-da replied with this 11 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #533,743
@533,712 (K)
Yeah! I think of it as
Positive envy: "I am happy for you that you got to spend time with that partner; I want to also have a good time with you!"
Negative jealousy: "I am upset with you for spending time with another partner because I don't want you to enjoy yourself with anybody else."
Slightly sifferent, but significant.
Yeah! I think of it as
Positive envy: "I am happy for you that you got to spend time with that partner; I want to also have a good time with you!"
Negative jealousy: "I am upset with you for spending time with another partner because I don't want you to enjoy yourself with anybody else."
Slightly sifferent, but significant.