Topic: For whom shall you vote, fora, in the 2016 election?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #39,848
Whom, fora?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNP | - | 0% | |
| UKIP | 4 | 44% | |
| SNP | - | 0% | |
| DUP | - | 0% | |
| Sinn Féin | 2 | 22% | |
| Plaid Cymru | 1 | 11% | |
| Official Monster Raving Loony Party | - | 0% | |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #530,635
Awful list, sorry!
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #530,637
2015. It's happening this year.
@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
Rather. There isn't a decent choice on there.
Out of interest, who will you be voting for, TTEH?
@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
Rather. There isn't a decent choice on there.
Out of interest, who will you be voting for, TTEH?
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #530,639
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I honestly don't know, for once. I sort of want to vote Green, but I disagree with them on nuclear energy, Trident, animal rights, and things like this. I'll probably end up voting Lib Dems. Don't think I could vote Labour and definitely don't want to vote Tory.
What about you?
I honestly don't know, for once. I sort of want to vote Green, but I disagree with them on nuclear energy, Trident, animal rights, and things like this. I'll probably end up voting Lib Dems. Don't think I could vote Labour and definitely don't want to vote Tory.
What about you?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #530,641
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #530,643
@530,639 (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
Yeah, the Greens I'm pretty unsure about. I read a piece in i recently that basically said that since they're something of a fringe protest movement that've all hitched their collective wagons to one issue, they lack consistency and have a lot of conflicting views within the party. I'm no expert, but it sounds plausible. And yeah, your link was pretty disturbing.
Overall, my main wish is for the nutter parties to be kept out. But I read in that same i that my constituency is predicted to be a very close battle between the tories and the lib dems, so my vote probably isn't crucial in keeping UKIP ect. out anyway. Therefore, I'll probably vote either tory or lib dem, based on whose propaganda impresses me the most.
Yeah, the Greens I'm pretty unsure about. I read a piece in i recently that basically said that since they're something of a fringe protest movement that've all hitched their collective wagons to one issue, they lack consistency and have a lot of conflicting views within the party. I'm no expert, but it sounds plausible. And yeah, your link was pretty disturbing.
Overall, my main wish is for the nutter parties to be kept out. But I read in that same i that my constituency is predicted to be a very close battle between the tories and the lib dems, so my vote probably isn't crucial in keeping UKIP ect. out anyway. Therefore, I'll probably vote either tory or lib dem, based on whose propaganda impresses me the most.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #530,651
Ron Paul
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #530,655
Putin.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 55 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,666
I'll be voting for based daveAnonymous G double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,667
@530,639 (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
@530,643 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> even considering voting for the greens
Bordering on treason, m80s
@530,643 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> even considering voting for the greens
Bordering on treason, m80s
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,673
@previous (G)
To clarify, I would not consider voting for them. I am unsure how I feel about them, but have heard some bad stuff, lately.
To clarify, I would not consider voting for them. I am unsure how I feel about them, but have heard some bad stuff, lately.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,676
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,684
Green issues need to be addressed especially with the latest abuse of the planet by energy companies. I would support anyone raising these issues, political inexperience aside.
Am surprised at the number of nationalist parties but am not worried.
Am surprised at the number of nationalist parties but am not worried.
Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,749
UKIP or the Greens.
Green double-posted this 11 years ago, 59 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,750
TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. replied with this 11 years ago, 9 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,824
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,829
Syntax, because no matter where on Earth disasters happen, he can drive there in 15 minutes.
TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. replied with this 11 years ago, 36 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,830
@530,643 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah, they certainly do seem that way, to me. They'd need to overhaul a fair few policies before I'd seriously consider voting for them. Plus, a lot of issues that made them attractive to me are supported by the Lib Dems, e.g. drug law liberalisation and prison reform, so I think the Libs'll get my vote.
Yeah, they certainly do seem that way, to me. They'd need to overhaul a fair few policies before I'd seriously consider voting for them. Plus, a lot of issues that made them attractive to me are supported by the Lib Dems, e.g. drug law liberalisation and prison reform, so I think the Libs'll get my vote.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 58 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,831
@530,643 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
A leftist group “lacking consistency” is a typical red herring to disenfranchise their potential voters.
A leftist group “lacking consistency” is a typical red herring to disenfranchise their potential voters.
TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,832
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,839
@530,831 (K)
It's not that they're leftist, but a fringe protest party who are (nominally) grouped by a single issue. So the case may be that a wide variety of politicians joined up either out of opportunism or idealism.
@530,830 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
I wonder how the Lib Dems feel about sex? Something about Dave's government that's really disturbed me is their small but significant censorships of pornography, which I find to be needless and prudish. I would expect something like that from a religious government, not a supposedly progressive one like ours. So hey, if the Lib Demsaee a bit more relaxed on censorship, they might get my vote.
It's not that they're leftist, but a fringe protest party who are (nominally) grouped by a single issue. So the case may be that a wide variety of politicians joined up either out of opportunism or idealism.
@530,830 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
I wonder how the Lib Dems feel about sex? Something about Dave's government that's really disturbed me is their small but significant censorships of pornography, which I find to be needless and prudish. I would expect something like that from a religious government, not a supposedly progressive one like ours. So hey, if the Lib Demsaee a bit more relaxed on censorship, they might get my vote.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Green replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,840
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,841
Green replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,842
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,844
Justin Trudeau 2015
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,849
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 46 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,859
@530,824 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
A Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition will be the least worst option we have come May. Voting for anyone other than the Conservatives will lead to a Labour/SNP/Greens coalition, and god help us if that happens.
A Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition will be the least worst option we have come May. Voting for anyone other than the Conservatives will lead to a Labour/SNP/Greens coalition, and god help us if that happens.
Anonymous G double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,860
@530,824 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
And besides, there are very few Conservative policies that I disagree with.
And besides, there are very few Conservative policies that I disagree with.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 38 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,861
@530,859 (G)
That does sound rather terrifying.
A three-way coalition would certainly be a sight to see, though.
That does sound rather terrifying.
A three-way coalition would certainly be a sight to see, though.
dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #530,875
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I had a chuckle at that last part. That is basically the standard here.
I had a chuckle at that last part. That is basically the standard here.