Topic: Can someone explain "concern trolling" to me?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #39,761 I'm not precisely sure what it means. Thanks.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 minute later[^] [v] #529,404 It's very possible that asking this will piss off the secret reptilian overlords. You should be careful with what you say online, you don't want to get v&.
Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 14 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #529,405 Pretending to be concerned about them, even though you are secretly trolling them I guess. Take McWalter. We are all pretending to be conc
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 33 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #529,411 concern trolling is stupidly easy. when you express concern about something people read that and think, "if someone is concerned then it must be a problem," and then when someone gets defensive and says, "that's not a problem, don't be concerned," it makes them look defensive and that raises suspicion. "is it really NOT a problem? how do we really know?"
and it is easier to claim there is concern than it is to prove there is no reason to BE concerned. so once a "concern" is out there it kinda stays out there.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 27 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #529,412 @OP
You sound a bit cross.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago , 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,413 @529,411 (squeegee )
Can you give an example?
@previous (E)
Fuck off.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago , 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,414 Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago , 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,416 @previous (E)
...Oh. I get it now. Thanks.
Ned Nye the Social Studies guy joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,417 I say that it is a problem in the world today.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,421 @529,411 (squeegee )
Squeegee has it.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago , 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,423 @529,416 (A)
Nice thankspost.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,435 This is a concern troll thread.
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago , 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,437 @529,413 (A)
i'm concerned that r04r's health problems could leave us without an admin, and that we should elect a co-admin just in case.
r04r replied with this 11 years ago , 54 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,438 @previous (squeegee )
Contingency plans have been put in place.
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago , 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,439 @previous (r04r )
like what? contingency plans can be pretty concerning
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago , 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,440 @529,437 (squeegee )
Becky is an admin.
Which is, itself, concerning...
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,443 @529,437 (squeegee )
Overly large breasts are not a legitimate health concern
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago , 52 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,450 FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,464 @previous (squeegee )
It clearly says right here
@529,443 (I)
> Overly large breasts are not a legitimate health concernswamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 22 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,467 @529,443 (I)
They can fuck up your neck and back.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 39 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,481 Syntax invented trolling
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 23 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,488 @529,467 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
and where will we be if r04r's neck and back give out? without a proper admin, that's right.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,497 @529,440 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
@previous (squeegee )
You know, becky is pretty smart...
also there is a crack team of internet experts currently studying the minichan code and learning how it works straight from the fingertips of r04r!
I wouldn't be concerned if i were you.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago , 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,498 Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 14 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,500 @529,481 (L)
> Syntax invented trollingFuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago , 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,722 @529,497 (N)
That's precisely
why you should be concerned...
↕