Minichan

Topic: re: the people who torment Chris Chan

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #39,756

He is an Autistic guy who is lonely, whose father died, and whose house burned down. What do you wish would happen to his tormentors?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #529,328

Why did you capitalize autistic?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #529,339

I only wish the best for his tormentors.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,350

I think you mean FAO, not RE. RE means regarding, so that'd imply this topic would be discussing them as a subject, yet you ask them a question. A more sensible headline would thus be either "FAO: The people who torment Chris Chan" or "RE: The tormenting of Chris Chan".

Meta joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,353

@previous (D)
OP probably got corrupted English re:Syntax's constant misuse of such.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,355

@previous (Meta)
This thread is, in fact, regarding his tormentors. Obviously, this thread is not actually directed to them.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,359

Chris will never love you.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,364

@529,355 (A)
Why do you overuse commas so much?

Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2 (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 44 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,365

@previous (G)
I use them correctly. Commas are intended to represent a natural pause in speech.

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,366

@previous (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
Incorrect. Thay're actually intended to separate clauses within a sentence.

Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2 (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,369

@previous (G)
Wrong. Separating clauses, which is one of their functions, is for the purposes of clarity, which is, as well, the purpose of pauses in speech.

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,372

@previous (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
You probably sound like a twat if you use that many pauses when you talk.

Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2 (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,374

@previous (G)
I sound educated. How do you sound?

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,375

@previous (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
I sound educated. You sound like a pretentious Liberal Arts major.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,378

@previous (G)
This.

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 22 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,379

@529,374 (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
You sound like a retard to me. Far from educated.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,382

@529,374 (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
Twat.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,383

@529,374 (Romeo Cassanova !LOVERh1VM2)
You sound viciously insecure to the extent that everything about your exterior persona is meant to put up walls that guard your fragile, child-like inner self.

HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,388

Peter Coffin is such a great guy to fuck with.

kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,402

@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
I've been enjoying him lately.

Meta replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,418

@OP
> He is an Autistic guy who is lonely, whose father died, and whose house burned down. What do you wish would happen to his tormentors?
He brought a lot of it upon himself. But let's look at the examples you cited. His father died, which is sad. My father died too. In most cases children tend to outlive their parents. Frankly I don't see how this affects anything: Robert Chandler died after the trolling had died down, at age 80.

His house burned down. Trolls from ED came and threw a Molotov cocktail? No, it burned down because CWC plugged in a coffee maker in his bathroom with a frayed extension cord.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,420

It's not like the trolling is all that proactive these days anyway. They pretty much just watch him now.

The CWCki even criticises try-hard trolls who try to troll him like back in the earlier days.

Meta replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,422

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
This. Most of the trolls (like all bullies, really) were losers if not CWC-level lolcows in their own right.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 35 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,430

@previous (Meta)
I don't think I'd say that's quite the case. At least not always.

I think that only in more recent times it's become the case that most of the overly-enthusiastic trolls are losers themselves. That's why the CWCki has developed terms like A-logging and Ween. Back in the older days, when Chris was more interactive and put out lots more content, anybody could step up and casually troll him a bit.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,444

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
CWCki didn't develop those terms.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,445

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Who did? The CWCki forums? Or that chan that follows him (I don't recall their number)?

(Edited 34 seconds later.)

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,446

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Those originated on 789chan several years ago. They were quickly adopted by the CWCki huehuehue because of the overlap in users.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,447

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Yeah, that's the chan I was thinking of.

netscape !fV146ZJdLc joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,505

i think its pretty fucking lame that
people "troll" him in the first
place, such low hanging fruit


it seems to me that he is a fuck up anyways
so why bother?

and its been going on for nearly 10 years

Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,551

@previous (netscape !fV146ZJdLc)
Its all about Karma. CWC trashes everybody and every thing. What he puts out on the net he gets right back in his face.

HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,572

@529,402 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Seriously it is hard to feel bad for him. He is like another Matt Miller...

netscape !fV146ZJdLc replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,598

@529,551 (Syntax)

> Its all about Karma. CWC trashes everybody and every thing. What he puts out on the net he gets right back in his face.

he's autistic who the fuck cares?
you're just as bad

fucking 74 years old and hanging
out on the internet talking
to people who arent even
a quarter of your age

Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,609

@previous (netscape !fV146ZJdLc)
1: You fail Math 101
2: People here are entertained by people younger and older then themselves
3: Your Queen is older then you and you are happy to be a puppet of the Queen because you pay to keep her in nappies.
4: The Topic "people who torment Chris Chan" I don't torment him I simply gave my opinion as to why such occurs
5: Sorry for your Autism

netscape !fV146ZJdLc replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,611

@previous (Syntax)

> 5: Sorry for your Autism

you are roleplaying as syntax
so im sorry for yours

> something about failing math

nice, cause he's actually 75?

> something about the queen

you keep saying this despite the fact
that i havent lived in the uk
for at least 4 years


> more illegible bullshit

cant imagine what mental illness
would cause you to pretend
that you're syntax

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,617

@previous (netscape !fV146ZJdLc)
Says the autistic 14 year old.
When you reach age 16 you will understand.

netscape !fV146ZJdLc replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #529,619

@previous (O)

> Says the autistic 14 year old.
> When you reach age 16 you will understand.

im sorry that you're so obsessed
with autism

im also sorry that you like
to imagine that i am 14

im also sorry that you like to obsess over
a fat virgin on the internet
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.