Topic: Hypothetically.... The NSA installs cameras in your house......
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #39,731
is this going to have any effect on your pornographic hobbies? I mean wouldn't it be kind of encouraging to have the US government recording you?!OhBrie5EHg joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #528,985
the NSA has had a backdoor into my systems for years... when they added cameras to EVERYTHING, I just assumed it was the NSA anyway... but yes, I have given them some files to collect in recent times as I have stopped giving any fucks about the NSA and their interest in digitized images of buttholes.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,986
I would work on improving my form and be sure to show a lot of enthusiasm.
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,988
I almost never look at porn.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,989
No, because you obviously wouldn't know. If you did know you'd remove the cameras or move. The NSA operates in the shadows. Your image is of the TSA, not the NSA.
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 11 years ago, 12 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,990
Remember, the cameras are just for you!
They could grab an image of you just using the shit they crammed into a Nokia back in the 90s.
Cameras do encourage 'bad behavior' though, maybe they just want to see how far that road goes?
They could grab an image of you just using the shit they crammed into a Nokia back in the 90s.
Cameras do encourage 'bad behavior' though, maybe they just want to see how far that road goes?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,991
@previous (!OhBrie5EHg)
So in a way.... its a sexy medical experiment, for the propose of national security. That sounds like a bad porno movie.
So in a way.... its a sexy medical experiment, for the propose of national security. That sounds like a bad porno movie.
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 11 years ago, 27 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,992
I find it amusing that nobody gave any fucks about the NSA until they started laughing at nudes in their spare time.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,995
Assuming that we can't just remove the cameras like Anon E said, then of course it would. Just knowing you're being observed is going to alter your behaviour.
Unless you really want of make their surveillance uncomfortable, of course. Then you might get even more daring than usual.
Unless you really want of make their surveillance uncomfortable, of course. Then you might get even more daring than usual.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,996
@previous (F)
Since everyone seems to be assuming you know the cameras are there you could, you know, put a cloth over it.
Since everyone seems to be assuming you know the cameras are there you could, you know, put a cloth over it.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,997
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,998
@528,996 (E)
Yes, but that goes against the spirit of the hypothetical.
At its core, it's just asking how your masturbation habits might change under NSA observation. The cameras are in there to make the scenario plausible.
Yes, but that goes against the spirit of the hypothetical.
At its core, it's just asking how your masturbation habits might change under NSA observation. The cameras are in there to make the scenario plausible.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #528,999
@previous (F)
In this hypothetical situation my habits would change by putting a cloth over the camera before starting.
In this hypothetical situation my habits would change by putting a cloth over the camera before starting.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,000
OP
Given we all no Govs of all countries currently eavesdrop on wot u r doing on net - no need to look in house.
Back in dark ages people bought magazines like playboy - such still exists so if one were to buy such from stores the security cam and cash register wood have info
of course you could pay cash but still the security camera. Trust me on this - People who work for US Gov or other Govs are people doing wot people do.
I wood look at porn n not saying i dont but i hate the photoshoop n other stuff they do to mess with a real image. Need real looking not lots of make up to cover up or camera tricks
One reason why over tanning which sure I see on beach here but really like the rest of non beach population is tan to the max
give me a break
Given we all no Govs of all countries currently eavesdrop on wot u r doing on net - no need to look in house.
Back in dark ages people bought magazines like playboy - such still exists so if one were to buy such from stores the security cam and cash register wood have info
of course you could pay cash but still the security camera. Trust me on this - People who work for US Gov or other Govs are people doing wot people do.
I wood look at porn n not saying i dont but i hate the photoshoop n other stuff they do to mess with a real image. Need real looking not lots of make up to cover up or camera tricks
One reason why over tanning which sure I see on beach here but really like the rest of non beach population is tan to the max
give me a break
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,009
Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #529,011
@previous (C)
As many times as you used mystery meat to make sausage - given u have no clue wot kinda meat u buy to make hotdogs.
As many times as you used mystery meat to make sausage - given u have no clue wot kinda meat u buy to make hotdogs.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,013
Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,014
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,017
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,026
@OP
It wouldn't change my browsing habits. I might cover up the webcam though.
Is that a dummy grenade? It looks like it might be.
It wouldn't change my browsing habits. I might cover up the webcam though.
Is that a dummy grenade? It looks like it might be.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #529,031
i wouldn't worry. they are already storing so much information it's growing more and more impossible to cull. in reasonable time anyway. i guess computers can sort that shit, but then google sorts my porn anyway. so it's either googles computers or the nsa's that know what i like to whack it to. so who cares?
they'd probably be more interested in the amateur porn sessions goong on than the screening of porn.
they'd probably be more interested in the amateur porn sessions goong on than the screening of porn.