Minichan

Topic: How important is it to include an interactive map with a restaurant review?

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #39,568

How important is it to include an interactive map with a restaurant review?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Perfectly necessary. 2 50%
Extremely important. 1 25%
Somewhat important. - 0%
Not too important. - 0%
Very unimportant. - 0%
Perfectly unnecessary. 1 25%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later[^] [v] #526,507

Depends if it's a local joint or not.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #526,508

@previous (B)
It is local, yes. Most website in China offer Baidu interactive maps. I am thinking that I should provide them too to keep up.

Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #526,509

@previous (A)
Yes, you should.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,540

Unnecessary because no one will read your reviews anyway

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,552

Yes, good. Drive your "business" into the ground by distracting yourself with minutia of features at the expense of content. What could go wrong?

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,553

@previous (D)
Content is already excellent. And why did you put "business" in quotation marks?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,556

Not important on its own, and I would be concerned about it interfering with the primary content.

On the other hand, if I were comparing several restaurants based on your reviews, it would be helpful to compare locations on a single map. Still, I would be happy with a simple link to another service for that.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,560

@previous (E)
Thank you for your advice.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 44 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,569

@526,553 (A)
Cause it will be gone and forgotten like GHOUL, Fooder Glove, Fansided, and the hotdog business by summer.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,570

@previous (F)
1. No, it will not.
2. There is no "hot dog business".

Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,571

@previous (A)
Okay Phil's wiener business. Whatever the fuck it was called.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,572

@previous (F)
what

Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,574

@previous (G)
Matt bought a business from some guy called Phil making sausages in Kunming.

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,575

@previous (F)
Haha, I missed that entirely. I guess it didn't work out?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,577

@526,574 (F)
lol you are wrong, but what is your "evidence"?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 24 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,578

@526,575 (G)
Evidence that it "didn't work out"?

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,580

@previous (A)
How drunk are you currently? It seems to be impacting your reading comprehension. I was asking a question and said "I guess". As such, I think it's fairly obvious that I do not actually have any evidence, since, you know, I was asking a question.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,585

@previous (G)
So, you like to guess about things with no evidence? That makes you a very common, low-class, typical dummy.

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 52 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,586

@previous (A)
*shrug* You have a track record, that is all the evidence I need.

In any case, I never made any claims here. Just asked questions. Get a fucking life, you fat fucking fuck.

(Edited 31 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,593

@previous (G)
Oh? What is that "track record", and what is the actual evidence of such? "Loldicks said so" is not acceptable evidence.

[Edited because this poster is a bitch who doxes other people and then bawws about his name being used]

(Edited 10 minutes later by a moderator.)

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 53 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,594

@previous (A)
How drunk are you right now? You sound angry.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,595

@previous (D)
What is your evidence that anything you think you know about me, is actually true? Serious question.

Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 31 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,596

@526,577 (A)
@526,578 (A)
My, my, someone's defensive tonight. It's pointless to reason with you. I can link you to GoKunming posts but anything which is embarrassing to your current business scam goes down the memory hole and retroactively becomes the work of Meals and Syntax who, depending on your blood alcohol level, is either a senile nonagenarian who can barely feed himself, or some kind of James Bond supervillain pursuing you across the world in an all-out cyber war.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,597

@previous (F)
"Gounming posts" lol. As if anything there "proves" anything. You are just like Syntax: take a bit here, a bit there, and create a ridiculous parallel universe.

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,598

@previous (A)

> Gounming

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #526,613

@526,593 (A)
> (Edited 10 minutes later by a moderator.)

lel

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #526,795

@OP

Make sure on your Miller Guide to do it like this:

"interactive map (pronounced as one word)"
"restaurant review (pronounced as one word)"

Stop being afraid of your own schtick. It's gotten 4 forums made for you. It'll make your guide popular because it's unique!

Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #526,803

@526,585 (A)
This will probably drive mod bat shit crazy
You asked for evidence.
Such exists with you logged in posting about the business multiple times.
I wood provide link but mod is already tearing wot little hair is left and will need viagra topical for head.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.