Minichan

Topic: Different drunks from different drinks.

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #38,908

Alcoholic beverages are all made from plants of some sort, and plants contain thousands of different phytochemicals, only some of which we even know or understand. It is my hypothesis that drinks made from different plants, produce different phytochemical effects on the body, and thus make one feel a different kind of drunk. For example, I certainly feel more intellectual when I drink wine than, say, tequila.

DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #518,720

You watched too much how I met your mother.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #518,721

@previous (DasSheeple)
No, this is a hypothesis that I have held for a long time, based on anecdotal evidence.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #518,723

It may also be one's perception of the drink that affects their behaviour whilst drunk.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #518,725

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yes, that is certainly possible. The reason I Am not sure about that, however, is that I first noticed these different effects when I was a teenager and drinking, before I even knew any of the lore or perception of certain drinks.

dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,778

I think hypothesises are generally supposed to be longer than --2-- 3 sentences

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,780

@previous (dw)
Not necessarily. A hypothesis can literally just be "x will affect y in a certain way". Obviously the explanation behind how it works usually requires much more elaboration, a hypothesis can just be the basic idea.

That's how it works in psychology, anyway.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,781

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
but this is about science

!wvAYL/zaDg joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,799

FUCK OFF FAGGIT!

Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,880

Well liquor gets you drunk quicker due to the higher alcohol content over a shorter period of time, whereas you take your time drinking a beer.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #518,887

@previous (Green)
Green, why are you saying "liquor"? You're British. We don't use that word. Americans do.

I am saddened you would betray the Crown like this.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Green replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #519,189

@previous (G)

I also say candy and soda. I've been saying it for years. Also, I've been spelling words like color without the u.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #519,197

@previous (Green)
I do that too, and spelling words like realize with a z instead of an s.

Syntax + Shakespeare joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #519,198

This is a short list of brand new words invented/created by Shakespeare

> academe accused addiction advertising amazement
> arouse assassination backing bandit bedroom
> beached besmirch birthplace blanket bloodstained
> barefaced blushing bet bump buzzer
> caked cater champion circumstantial cold-blooded
> compromise courtship countless critic dauntless
> dawn deafening discontent dishearten drugged
> dwindle epileptic equivocal elbow excitement
> exposure eyeball fashionable fixture flawed
> frugal generous gloomy gossip green-eyed
> gust hint hobnob hurried impede
> impartial invulnerable jaded label lackluster
> laughable lonely lower luggage lustrous
> madcap majestic marketable metamorphize mimic
> monumental moonbeam mountaineer negotiate noiseless
> obscene obsequiously ode olympian outbreak
> panders pedant premeditated puking radiance
> rant remorseless savagery scuffle secure
> skim milk submerge summit swagger torture
> tranquil undress unreal varied vaulting
> worthless zany gnarled grovel

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #519,360

@519,189 (Green)
Well, don't. You aren't American.
@519,197 (H)
Usually, both the z and s spellings are acceptable in British English, though. The Oxford English Dictionary actually prefers -ize spellings in words like realize. It's a common belief that -ize was a US invention, but it wasn't, it's just -ise is massively more popular.

Green replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #519,387

@previous (G)

Sweets and fizzy pop sound retarded though. Candy and soda are redundant words in British english.

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #519,419

@previous (Green)
What's wrong with sweets? And I just say "fizzy" or call them soft drinks.

Green replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #519,420

@previous (G)
It just sounds wrong.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #519,421

@previous (Green)
It just sounds wrong...
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.