Topic: How to deal with a bitch.
Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #38,457
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #513,981
> return of kingsoh, i read about that place
it's that misogynist website where angry men go to rage about women
anyway, didn't read lol
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #513,983
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> don't read
> angrily judge anyway
> claim to be better than angry feminists
> don't read
> angrily judge anyway
> claim to be better than angry feminists
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #513,985
@previous (A)I don't even need to go beyond the first sentence to see how stupidly biased this is. One of the first things it says is "untamed bitch", which besides being a rather unflattering way of describing a woman, also carried the implication that they require "taming", and that "untamed" women are wrong.
But of course, this is (probably) a troll thread and arguing that that place is biased is like arguing that the Daily Mail is right wing. So, like, whatever, man.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #513,986
Sounds like a fine description of Kook at her worst.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #513,987
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #513,988
Okay, I skimmed through it a bit, and it's is actually pretty funny. For some reason, it reads like a guide on animals. We have the author describing bitches as a "species", one which has an aggressive instrict but can easily be outrun. And then the article seems to end with advice to place one's hand on the face of a bitch, and simply move their head away if one ambushes you.I'm honestly not sure if this is a parody or what. I think it's some lame attempt at humour, maybe?
@previous (A)
Art thou haveth a giggle?
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #513,998
@OP
Too complex for me. The Goldstein Method is more effective.
Too complex for me. The Goldstein Method is more effective.
Ksr !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 53 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #513,999
@513,988 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Some guys take shit like this quite seriously and it's disturbing as fuck.
http://www.reddit.com/r/theredpill/
I didn't read the article, it might be parody, but this type of stuff is sadly common. This type of thinking is what led to billions of women covered in burkas and being beaten on the regular. Certain types of people can be so angry and dumb.
Some guys take shit like this quite seriously and it's disturbing as fuck.
http://www.reddit.com/r/theredpill/
I didn't read the article, it might be parody, but this type of stuff is sadly common. This type of thinking is what led to billions of women covered in burkas and being beaten on the regular. Certain types of people can be so angry and dumb.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,001
@513,988 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It isn't satire, these people actually think this way. They are also typically bitter about how much trouble they have getting women, which they blame women for. It doesn't actually make any sense and there isn't a whole lot of internal consistency but for some reason people like this shit. I don't get it.
It isn't satire, these people actually think this way. They are also typically bitter about how much trouble they have getting women, which they blame women for. It doesn't actually make any sense and there isn't a whole lot of internal consistency but for some reason people like this shit. I don't get it.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,004
@513,999 (Ksr !KansasxqvM)
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yeah, I know their deal. Bitter guys who have become horribly, bizzarely disillusioned about women. Usually spend their time raging about feminism and passing around disturbing pickup strategies. There's a lot of websites like the one in the OP, but RoK is the most prominent, AFAIK.
I thought it might be a parody because of the fucking weird way it's presented, but now I figure that this is what passes for humour among misogynists. Like how racists might tell racist jokes to each other.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yeah, I know their deal. Bitter guys who have become horribly, bizzarely disillusioned about women. Usually spend their time raging about feminism and passing around disturbing pickup strategies. There's a lot of websites like the one in the OP, but RoK is the most prominent, AFAIK.
I thought it might be a parody because of the fucking weird way it's presented, but now I figure that this is what passes for humour among misogynists. Like how racists might tell racist jokes to each other.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,008
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 12 years ago, 53 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,011
@514,004 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Ok I didn't want to read it but it was actually so bizarre I am just going to pretend it is some kind of self-parody. Like can anyone actually believe this shit?
Ok I didn't want to read it but it was actually so bizarre I am just going to pretend it is some kind of self-parody. Like can anyone actually believe this shit?
Ksr !KansasxqvM replied with this 12 years ago, 33 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,019
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Like can anyone actually believe this shit?
> climate deniers
> anti-vaccine advocates
> holocaust deniers
> religion
Yes, I'd say it's possible for people to believe in that shit.
> Like can anyone actually believe this shit?
> climate deniers
> anti-vaccine advocates
> holocaust deniers
> religion
Yes, I'd say it's possible for people to believe in that shit.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,024
@514,001 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> It isn't satire, these people actually think this way.
The site is some men's rights site, posting rambled articles of useless bad advice.
About the specific article, some people actually behave like aggressive dogs, same mentality and everything. There was a good article I read somewhere once about men and women that keep aggressive dog breeds and encourage them to be aggressive--be it assaulting people or barking nonstop all the time. That those types have the same types of minds as those aggressive dogs-highly emotional, extroverted, aggressive, trying to dominate. If their dog bites you and you kick it away, they say "Don't kick my dog!" and that's all they care about.
> It isn't satire, these people actually think this way.
The site is some men's rights site, posting rambled articles of useless bad advice.
About the specific article, some people actually behave like aggressive dogs, same mentality and everything. There was a good article I read somewhere once about men and women that keep aggressive dog breeds and encourage them to be aggressive--be it assaulting people or barking nonstop all the time. That those types have the same types of minds as those aggressive dogs-highly emotional, extroverted, aggressive, trying to dominate. If their dog bites you and you kick it away, they say "Don't kick my dog!" and that's all they care about.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,026
@513,986 (C)
> Sounds like a fine description of Kook at her worst.
Kook's mainly been rational.
@513,998 (Metæ)
> The Goldstein Method is more effective.
What's that? I did search the internet for it and found nothing.
> Sounds like a fine description of Kook at her worst.
Kook's mainly been rational.
@513,998 (Metæ)
> The Goldstein Method is more effective.
What's that? I did search the internet for it and found nothing.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,028
I peeked at their frontpage. About a tenth of their articles aren't about women or masculinity:
Job market:
http://www.returnofkings.com/48373/permanent-unemployment-is-americas-permanent-future
Blacks and Muslims:
http://www.returnofkings.com/49279/freedom-of-speech-is-dying-in-sweden
http://www.returnofkings.com/46099/why-the-media-uses-the-death-of-michael-brown-to-promote-racial-division
http://www.returnofkings.com/49185/cultural-collapse-theory-the-7-steps-that-lead-to-a-complete-culture-decline
Job market:
http://www.returnofkings.com/48373/permanent-unemployment-is-americas-permanent-future
Blacks and Muslims:
http://www.returnofkings.com/49279/freedom-of-speech-is-dying-in-sweden
http://www.returnofkings.com/46099/why-the-media-uses-the-death-of-michael-brown-to-promote-racial-division
http://www.returnofkings.com/49185/cultural-collapse-theory-the-7-steps-that-lead-to-a-complete-culture-decline
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,029
@514,024 (H)
I find it extremely distressing if there are people out there seriously saying that it's okay to grab somebody's face and turn them away.
These MRAs. They're unbelievable, sometimes.
I find it extremely distressing if there are people out there seriously saying that it's okay to grab somebody's face and turn them away.
These MRAs. They're unbelievable, sometimes.
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,032
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
You know the article writer would never do that himself. He's just trying to get gullible people to do that.
You know the article writer would never do that himself. He's just trying to get gullible people to do that.
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #514,042
@514,026 (H)
The Goldstein Method is simple:
1: Do you see a woman?
Yes: Ask her would she like to swing dance dance DANCE 2nite
No: Keep looking for a woman.
2. Did she accept your offer of ten myle swing dance 2nite?
Yes: Dance all night, goto 1
No: Zoooooooooooooooooooooom ---------------------->
(and pay Harvard medical school tuition, if applicable.)
The Goldstein Method is simple:
1: Do you see a woman?
Yes: Ask her would she like to swing dance dance DANCE 2nite
No: Keep looking for a woman.
2. Did she accept your offer of ten myle swing dance 2nite?
Yes: Dance all night, goto 1
No: Zoooooooooooooooooooooom ---------------------->
(and pay Harvard medical school tuition, if applicable.)