Topic: The overrepresentation of blacks among arrested persons
Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #38,351
Any debate on race and criminality in the United States must begin with the fact that blacks are responsible for an astoundingly disproportionate number of crimes, which has been the case for at least the past half a century."Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein in their classic 1985 study, “Crime and Human Nature.” “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.
High rates of black violence in the late twentieth century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination.
The problem is black criminal behavior, which is one manifestation of a black pathology that ultimately stems from the breakdown of the black family. Liberals want to talk about what others should do for blacks instead of what blacks should do for themselves. But if we don’t acknowledge the cultural barriers to black progress, how can we address them? How can you even begin to fix something that almost no one wants to talk about honestly?
Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #512,893
3Rd time I have used this today.
There is a theory I fully subscribe2. Years ago fyne Christian men for profit and as allowed by the bible - Went in2 Africa, and loaded humans in2 ships and sold them at auction.
History lessons say that was a long time ago. Yet those Slaves once set free after them massive rapes and tortures were not free at all. Totally persecuted by wot we call Red States.
So in my life time blacks were not allowed to marry whites - sat in backs of bus's AND worst of all ended up educated in run down schools and ended up as 2nd class citizens.
Family unit for blacks is super high percent of black men run off after giving black woman a child.
Comes down to Karma.
Slavery of long ago with horrid Segregation that followed and still does into this century. You end up with lost of poor black people from broken homes = Crimes.
There is a theory I fully subscribe2. Years ago fyne Christian men for profit and as allowed by the bible - Went in2 Africa, and loaded humans in2 ships and sold them at auction.
History lessons say that was a long time ago. Yet those Slaves once set free after them massive rapes and tortures were not free at all. Totally persecuted by wot we call Red States.
So in my life time blacks were not allowed to marry whites - sat in backs of bus's AND worst of all ended up educated in run down schools and ended up as 2nd class citizens.
Family unit for blacks is super high percent of black men run off after giving black woman a child.
Comes down to Karma.
Slavery of long ago with horrid Segregation that followed and still does into this century. You end up with lost of poor black people from broken homes = Crimes.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 57 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #512,896
ShitArse thread
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #512,899
sorry but violent crime has decreased dramatically since the nineties while incarceration rates have risen so that doesn't say much
also intraracial violence isn't a real factor in This discussion ever it's illogical
Rather than blaming victims for being subjugated and dehumanized by a wholly corrupt series of inherently racist institutions (ghettos, redlining, Etc and you can't have that discussion and ignore the fact that blacks are disproportionately accosted and convicted compared to whites/others) why don't you step out of your comfort zone and consider that fairness isn't part of this equation
black people do not and should not need to conform to your white supremacist standards
nobody is talking about 'what liberals can do for black people' it's about people like you and the injustices that you benefit from
keep being Comfortable op
also intraracial violence isn't a real factor in This discussion ever it's illogical
Rather than blaming victims for being subjugated and dehumanized by a wholly corrupt series of inherently racist institutions (ghettos, redlining, Etc and you can't have that discussion and ignore the fact that blacks are disproportionately accosted and convicted compared to whites/others) why don't you step out of your comfort zone and consider that fairness isn't part of this equation
black people do not and should not need to conform to your white supremacist standards
nobody is talking about 'what liberals can do for black people' it's about people like you and the injustices that you benefit from
keep being Comfortable op
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #512,928
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #512,950
@512,893 (Syntax)
Africans sold their own people into slavery as part of the Arab slave trade. Arabs also had been abducting people from Europe.
Supposedly it was jews who brought the slaves over from Africa. A lot of sources say so, though nobody except Louis Farrakhan will stand up and say it in person. I wouldn't put it past Christians either. In South Africa, whites moved in and quickly outnumbed the native Khoisan African race. They imported a ton of them into South Africa from way on the other side of Africa in the Congo (a different race), making the Khoisan go extinct even fast and eventually making whites themselves get genocided because their ancestors wanted cheap labor.
Most of them went to the Carribean and Brazil -- you can see how much higher a percentage of blacks there are. It was really a way to screw over the Native Americans in Latin America. Interbreed with not just Europeans but Africans too and they lose their heritage completely.
America's first slave owner was black:
http://topconservativenews.com/2012/03/americas-first-slave-owner-was-a-black-man/
> Family unit for blacks is super high percent of black men run off after giving black woman a child.
Go into Youtube and type:
You are not the father
You are the father
Both of those. Very funny Maury clips.
> Brits did this around planet earth and in England they now have immigrants
You know the whole area of London used to be marshland before the Romans came and started messing with it. I really think the area would've been better without the Romans and left to the druids. The ancient Celts were one of the few ancient peoples who opposed slavery.
Africans sold their own people into slavery as part of the Arab slave trade. Arabs also had been abducting people from Europe.
Supposedly it was jews who brought the slaves over from Africa. A lot of sources say so, though nobody except Louis Farrakhan will stand up and say it in person. I wouldn't put it past Christians either. In South Africa, whites moved in and quickly outnumbed the native Khoisan African race. They imported a ton of them into South Africa from way on the other side of Africa in the Congo (a different race), making the Khoisan go extinct even fast and eventually making whites themselves get genocided because their ancestors wanted cheap labor.
Most of them went to the Carribean and Brazil -- you can see how much higher a percentage of blacks there are. It was really a way to screw over the Native Americans in Latin America. Interbreed with not just Europeans but Africans too and they lose their heritage completely.
America's first slave owner was black:
http://topconservativenews.com/2012/03/americas-first-slave-owner-was-a-black-man/
> Family unit for blacks is super high percent of black men run off after giving black woman a child.
Go into Youtube and type:
You are not the father
You are the father
Both of those. Very funny Maury clips.
> Brits did this around planet earth and in England they now have immigrants
You know the whole area of London used to be marshland before the Romans came and started messing with it. I really think the area would've been better without the Romans and left to the druids. The ancient Celts were one of the few ancient peoples who opposed slavery.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,386
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,391
Slaves and crime are good for the economy.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 17 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,621
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 37 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,626
@512,928 (E)
Another intelligent and well-researched reply. This thread is brimming with well-informed debate.
Another intelligent and well-researched reply. This thread is brimming with well-informed debate.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,659
Poverty cycle + retarded drug laws + rampant American anti-intellectualism = genetics apparently
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #513,665
Mah boy is an angel he dindunuffin i swer yall crackas cant prove it anyway