Minichan

Topic: Saw this in the news

Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #38,209

India has been trying to exercise population control by encouraging women to not have more then 2-3 children, and recommending them to go under the knife to stop that from happening. Healthcare in India is horrible and so women have been dying in these surgeries.

Then this comes: even though its cheaper and safer to sterilize men, the government has focused on the women

Well duh, thats for obvious reasons right? Even though it takes two to make a child, a woman can easily still have more children even though her husband is sterilized.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #511,442

what can we do to help, op?

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #511,457

Because men get off on the idea of gaving potent semen.

Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 54 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,460

@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
[citation needed]

[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,461

Because women are the holders of birth, its not our fault if they catch our seed

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,463

@previous ([^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk)
kill yourself

kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,464

@511,460 (Metæ)
Nope

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,501

historically that seems to be the norm I wonder why
like in Puerto Rico and the U.S.
scummy Men did the same thing NOT 2 long ago. Now off 2 surf my ocean blue it's 11 pm do you know where your kids are ?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,535

@511,457 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
Actually the opposite. Being potent is seen as generally normal, while being impotent is seen as unmanly, and something to be hidden away and not discussed and not something to see a Dr about.

Sure you get the odd guy with 27 kids who is ordinately proud of it. 99% of men don't want any more than 2 or 3 kids purely down to finances.

Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 7 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,613

@previous (I)
she's right. Ask any dude not trying to have kids if he wants a vasectomy and youd probably get an oddly low number

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,619

> India has been trying to exercise population control by encouraging women to not have more then 2-3 children

It's the opposite in Western countries where they pay people to have as many kids as they can.


> Healthcare in India is horrible

India has free universal healthcare. India has good healthcare. It doesn't have Obamacare.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,621

@previous (J)

I can't tell when people are joking or not.

Anonymous J replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,623

@previous (K)

Even Michael Moore hates Obamacare.

Anonymous K replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,624

@previous (J)

yeah but but... the thing about india having a good healthcare was a joke right?

Anonymous J replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,628

@previous (K)

I saw a video online of it and it seemed good but was a bit outdated. The doctors used The Four Humors and looked at people's fingernails.

Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,634

@511,613 (H)
Yeah, because time and circumstances change. They might not want one now but may in the future.

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #511,646

@511,464 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
You're assuming every man wants kids. I know I certainty don't. I don't get why potent sperm is something to care about. An ejaculation has something like 180 million sperm. Even if 99% of them were duds, it would still be enough (in theory) to repopulate the city of Houston with just 1% of one ejaculation. I really don't see the need for more potency than that.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #511,703

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pj4L7C2twI

UNICEF made this for India.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.