r04r joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,507
@508,419 (A)
According to google analytics minichan got 122,309 pageviews past month. Now I'm not sure how accurate that is since I don't really carea, but yeah.
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,508
No.
Anonymous H double-posted this 12 years ago, 26 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,509
10,000 hits
Anonymous H triple-posted this 12 years ago, 18 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,510
each month
Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 12 years ago, 24 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,511
is not
Anonymous H quintuple-posted this 12 years ago, 18 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,512
very much.
Ks joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 31 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,518
@508,507 (r04r)
Consider putting in some non-intrusive text ads and donating the proceeds to a worthy cause.
r04r replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,520
@previous (Ks)
I'm not sure what kind of service would provide text-only ads, nor how I would use it without doxing myself. I don't think they'd pay very much either. Additionally I think some disgruntled user would just keep on clicking the ads to get the account banned, which sadly enough seems to actually be a viable strategy if you really dislike a site. Oh and I'm sure a very large percentage of our userbase runs an adblocker.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
dw !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,521
@508,518 (Ks)
I thought that you were citing Matt and I actually laughed.
Ks replied with this 12 years ago, 26 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,523
@508,520 (r04r)
I don't know why I didn't consider any of those things. I should think before I type.
r04r replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,527
@previous (Ks)
It was a nice idea! I was thinking maybe you knew of some service that did "ads for charity" which didn't require much of a signup or something.
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,554
@previous (r04r)
It's cute to think of Matt doing something for charity.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#508,556
@508,527 (r04r) > It was a nice idea! I was thinking maybe you knew of some service that did "ads for charity" which didn't require much of a signup or something.
I no a gal who specializes in exactly This and will check with her. The click on to drive advertisers away DOES WORK LOL nor has anyone so far figured out a way to stop that.
What surprised me is the number of new visitors so they must be lurkers OR other spiders which Google Analytic's seems to not seperate from analysis. There are other paid for resources that analyze with Url referrals - And if I had time it wood be interesting to see what the Amazon owned service says about the site. May not be big enough to show more then just the basics like page views users sessions etc.
OUT of here-------------------->
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#508,999
10k hits a month is no way to make money.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#509,291