Topic: 2014 is almost over and you're still cis. Why is that?
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc started this discussion 12 years ago #37,369
No poll because I couldn't come up with a good reason.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 43 seconds later[^] [v] #503,844
Because I enjoy being normal. :)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #503,846
no im not
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,852
@503,844 (B)
are you sure that's the word you want to use? like... cis people aren't natural.
god didn't make you cis.
are you sure that's the word you want to use? like... cis people aren't natural.
god didn't make you cis.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 49 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,853
what does CIS mean?
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,854
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,856
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,857
@previous (B)
cis is a natural state like being white is the natural state. to be a person of color would be an active choice.
cis is a natural state like being white is the natural state. to be a person of color would be an active choice.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,858
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
now you mention it, you're right. black people are awful and commit a disproportionate amount of crimes, and can't spell or write, etc.; we should lynch them all. fucking niggers.
glad we agree
now you mention it, you're right. black people are awful and commit a disproportionate amount of crimes, and can't spell or write, etc.; we should lynch them all. fucking niggers.
glad we agree
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,859
@previous (B)
isnt it convenient people actively choose to be in the most dangerous categories to live in? it makes it so much easier to shoot at. i'm so glad they chose that. :)
isnt it convenient people actively choose to be in the most dangerous categories to live in? it makes it so much easier to shoot at. i'm so glad they chose that. :)
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #503,868
okay, so... what?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,882
dicks
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,886
@503,853 (squeegee)
> what does CIS mean?
its a madeup word made up by a tranny on usenet in 94, it basically means anyone that is non-trans, i.e. someone who is mentally sound and has a regular life
crazy i know
> what does CIS mean?
its a madeup word made up by a tranny on usenet in 94, it basically means anyone that is non-trans, i.e. someone who is mentally sound and has a regular life
crazy i know
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,891
@previous (F)
i don't get why the lgbt community is so hung up on labels. it's exclusionary and culturally counterproductive.
i don't get why the lgbt community is so hung up on labels. it's exclusionary and culturally counterproductive.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,895
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,897
@503,891 (squeegee)
its amusing actually like
labels are completely opt in when it comes to gender identities like nb and trans as a whole but the cis/trans dichotomy exists for a reason - and that reason is to remove the otherness from being cis, a fundamental step in actually being Chill with trans people? which is hardly a bad thing.
(like. most of the users here have no chill when it comes to this. shit, think about how long i've been posting the last month and how much of that devolves into slinging slurs and bigotry compared to what i've actually posted before devolving into pure self-parody. i posted a thread about the new smash on tc and that i finally turned 18 and then ??? someone was like HEY ARENT YOU AN SJW, STOP RUINING OUR FUN despite not posting about about it at all until that backlash occured)
anyways labels are 100% opt-in and always have been and like. if you don't wanna id as cis maybe you're not nearly as cis as you thought you were.
its amusing actually like
labels are completely opt in when it comes to gender identities like nb and trans as a whole but the cis/trans dichotomy exists for a reason - and that reason is to remove the otherness from being cis, a fundamental step in actually being Chill with trans people? which is hardly a bad thing.
(like. most of the users here have no chill when it comes to this. shit, think about how long i've been posting the last month and how much of that devolves into slinging slurs and bigotry compared to what i've actually posted before devolving into pure self-parody. i posted a thread about the new smash on tc and that i finally turned 18 and then ??? someone was like HEY ARENT YOU AN SJW, STOP RUINING OUR FUN despite not posting about about it at all until that backlash occured)
anyways labels are 100% opt-in and always have been and like. if you don't wanna id as cis maybe you're not nearly as cis as you thought you were.
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,903
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
labels are not opt in if i go around calling people faggots and treating them differently than others. Labels can be applied as much as they can be internalized.
Calling people CIS is just a gay way to sling around unwanted labels, and in the contexts i've heard it in, as in, Die CIS scum, or other memes, it's obviously meant to be at least vaguely insulting. So i'm not sure why there's this new nigger-word for heterosexuals since heterosexual seems to work fine as a label for... heterosexuals. except that some people want a nigger-word for heterosexuals.
"Let's force an an unwanted label onto heterosexuals so they'll understand what it's like to have unwanted labels forced onto you! Go team bisexual, lesbian, gay and transexual! Die CIS scum!"
labels are not opt in if i go around calling people faggots and treating them differently than others. Labels can be applied as much as they can be internalized.
Calling people CIS is just a gay way to sling around unwanted labels, and in the contexts i've heard it in, as in, Die CIS scum, or other memes, it's obviously meant to be at least vaguely insulting. So i'm not sure why there's this new nigger-word for heterosexuals since heterosexual seems to work fine as a label for... heterosexuals. except that some people want a nigger-word for heterosexuals.
"Let's force an an unwanted label onto heterosexuals so they'll understand what it's like to have unwanted labels forced onto you! Go team bisexual, lesbian, gay and transexual! Die CIS scum!"
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,904
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,905
kook !!32zdfdzi+ triple-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,906
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,907
@503,903 (squeegee)
except nobody says die cis scum except for people looking for straw arguments.
and even if people did say that, "die cis scum" is literally meaningless because trans people don't have a power structure rigged in their favor (question: why are there no trans people in power? hint: why did it take 200 years for there to be a president of color?)
except nobody says die cis scum except for people looking for straw arguments.
and even if people did say that, "die cis scum" is literally meaningless because trans people don't have a power structure rigged in their favor (question: why are there no trans people in power? hint: why did it take 200 years for there to be a president of color?)
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,909
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,911
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Post your topic history on tc. I want to see the time when you called me a terf.
Post your topic history on tc. I want to see the time when you called me a terf.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,912
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,913
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 50 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,914
@503,909 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Show us your posting history, so that we can see put your posts on a timeline and confirm these claims.
Show us your posting history, so that we can see put your posts on a timeline and confirm these claims.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,915
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,916
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,917
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,918
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,919
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> i posted a thread about the new smash on tc and that i finally turned 18 and then ??? someone was like HEY ARENT YOU AN SJW, STOP RUINING OUR FUN despite not posting about about it at all until that backlash occured
you can literally look at the screencap and see that
> i posted a thread about the new smash on tc and that i finally turned 18 and then ??? someone was like HEY ARENT YOU AN SJW, STOP RUINING OUR FUN despite not posting about about it at all until that backlash occured
you can literally look at the screencap and see that
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,920
I think that Vocalon is trolling.
I hope he is, anyway.
I hope he is, anyway.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,921
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,922
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,923
@503,920 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
i'd say 30/70 seriousness and me fuckin' around to get a response.
i'd say 30/70 seriousness and me fuckin' around to get a response.
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,924
Don't forget your long post back explaining your opinions and stance on all your SJW shit, Vocalon, pretending you came to any conclusions on your own when we all know you cant think for yourself.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,925
@previous (I)
oh yeah i won't. i'm not denying there's some basis in how i actually think here. i'm sayin' it's more fun to flaunt it as a way to piss people off than it is to actually have real discussions.
oh yeah i won't. i'm not denying there's some basis in how i actually think here. i'm sayin' it's more fun to flaunt it as a way to piss people off than it is to actually have real discussions.
Auntie Em joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,926
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 13 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,927
@503,925 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Because you cant have real discussions, not because youre funny or a troll.
Because you cant have real discussions, not because youre funny or a troll.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,928
@503,922 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
I'm pretty sure he is. Come on, he's being so overblown about it.
@503,925 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
I wouldn't mind having an actual discussion about it. Though, in fairness, there is a good chance that it would go to shit on here anyway.
I'm pretty sure he is. Come on, he's being so overblown about it.
@503,925 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
I wouldn't mind having an actual discussion about it. Though, in fairness, there is a good chance that it would go to shit on here anyway.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 7 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,929
@503,926 (Auntie Em)
yes but it doesnt matter because you dont actually seem to know what that means
@503,927 (I)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvTNyKIGXiI
yes but it doesnt matter because you dont actually seem to know what that means
@503,927 (I)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvTNyKIGXiI
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 40 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,930
@503,925 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
that's silly. rather than going to the trouble of having rational debates, you'd further alienate people to your views as a whole. it's counterproductive.
that's silly. rather than going to the trouble of having rational debates, you'd further alienate people to your views as a whole. it's counterproductive.
Auntie Em replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,933
@503,929 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
> yes but it doesnt matter because you dont actually seem to know what that means
>
I obviously do if I pegged you.
> yes but it doesnt matter because you dont actually seem to know what that means
>
I obviously do if I pegged you.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,934
OP is a child
A dumb child tho
A dumb child tho
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,939
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,966
@503,907 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
but that's the only thing i know about CIS are dikes holding up signs yelling die CIS scum and and Check your CIS privilege, as ifthey know anything about someone becuase they are white and straight. i could make judgements on people becuase they are black and/or homosexual but that would be bigotry.
the whole sjw movement is just PCness being used to promote bigotry of white and or straight people.
that is how i, a straight whits person, views the movement. like homosexual fascism. pride run amok.
but that's the only thing i know about CIS are dikes holding up signs yelling die CIS scum and and Check your CIS privilege, as ifthey know anything about someone becuase they are white and straight. i could make judgements on people becuase they are black and/or homosexual but that would be bigotry.
the whole sjw movement is just PCness being used to promote bigotry of white and or straight people.
that is how i, a straight whits person, views the movement. like homosexual fascism. pride run amok.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,967
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,986
I know this is just a shtick, vocalon.
Auntie Em replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #504,009
@503,939 (C)
Note to self: apparently the meaning of "pegged" has multiplied in the last 30 years. Use with extreme caution.
Note to self: apparently the meaning of "pegged" has multiplied in the last 30 years. Use with extreme caution.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #504,012
@OP
It's real simple. If you were born with a penis, then you are a man. If you were born with a vagina, then you are a woman. Period. Got it, Moe?
It's real simple. If you were born with a penis, then you are a man. If you were born with a vagina, then you are a woman. Period. Got it, Moe?