Minichan

Topic: $467.30

Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw started this discussion 12 years ago #37,227

$467.30

Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 22 seconds later[^] [v] #503,063

$467.30

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 52 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #503,069

Pales in comparison to.

Meta joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #503,070

@OP
Is that how much it costs to touch the cow™

Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,081

@previous (Meta)
yea

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,087

@OP
No contract. No signature. No documentation. No proof. No debt. Thanks.

(Edited 8 minutes later.)

Meta replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,090

@503,081 (Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw)
Can I get a discount if I just stand really close to the cow? Or if I touch a llama instead?

Meta double-posted this 12 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,091

@503,087 (D)
Actually, you do need to sign the agreement and disclaimer to touch the cow®

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,092

@503,069 (B)
Student loans. Not applicable under current income threshold statutes. Thanks.

vocalon !74TdoRkjCc joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 38 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,095

Falco joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,096

haha this is how much i just spent on some awesome weed

blaze up with me minichan

Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 49 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,101

@503,087 (D)
yeah. you're a faggot

@previous (Falco)
$420

Dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,112

@503,087 (D)
I dont think its a legal issue as much as an ethical one.

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,114

@previous (Dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
Neither legal nor ethical. Thanks.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 26 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,115

Will say this about Fatfuck. I cannot remember a single tyme when ethics was an issue with him. In the culture he grew up in, ethics simply was never part of the equation.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,117

@previous (Syntax)

What culture is that?

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,119

@previous (H)
Looser~ann culture. Crime rate is very high and his own family is full of crooked er crooks. One can now say Fatfuck is a chip off the old block or like Father like Son.

Ooooooops that needs edit. Fatfucks dad may be a low down dirty crook but there is no reason to believe he is a pedophile such as fatfuck is

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 51 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,121

@previous (Syntax)
> senile
> deadbeat
> stalker

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,122

@previous (D)
^^^
Piece of shit.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,213

@503,121 (D)
It's not stalking or harassment to try and keep the Internet free from crime.

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,214

@503,087 (D)
These are not requirements for something to be a valid debt.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,216

@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
The problem here is simple. It took Indy a decade to bet his BS degree and perhaps 5 more years to get his MS degree. Neither Math or the Law were subjects Indy bothered to study. (He instead spent anytyme that was available in scat porn)

So he is unaware that [copypasta off legal www] There is no time limit on suing to collect on federal student loans, and the borrower can be sued indefinitely.

He is under some false impression that a statue of limitations wipes out his IRS past dues. Its complicated and fortunately the IRS publishes the guide they use on statue of limitations as applied
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part25/irm_25-006-001r.html#d0e116

My two years of law as a minor to my BSEE at UCLA taught me a valuable lesson. Which is the ONLY Thing I learned while in study of Torts I learned to NEVER EVER trust common sense when applied to the law and to never ever think I no a damn thing about it. I can read English and when a question comes up the WWW offers attorneys and the US Gov with published statues and court cases that apply.

Mistakes on IRS returns do have Statue of Limitations on collections. Mistrakes is the operative word. Any attempt to defraud the IRS or any False claim or a simple failure to submit a change of address form so the IRS can send letters of being in the rears and http://www.irs.gov/irm/part25/irm_25-006-001r.html#d0e116 makes it very clear there IS NO STATUE OF LIMITATIONS

Of course with the quality of @OPs MS degree he may not be expected to understand any of this. He only learned rules of grammar in multiple languages and not even Chinese for all those years in school.

Getting ready to roll out for

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,217

@previous (Syntax)
Oh, I think the other poster and I were talking about the $467.30 owed to protip. But okay.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,218

@503,092 (D)

> Student loans. Not applicable under current income threshold statutes. Thanks.

@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Yes that is true - However as you can see the $467.30 is chump change by comparison to what he owes the IRS and what he owes in Student loans (unpaid)

And Eels and I have a unique mixed sets of communication about the $467.30. Because Eels in a moment of extreme frustration made just one post on the subject, that gave Indy the impression that the debt is forgiven. Eels many tymes has posted that ITS JUST NOT TRUE

And Eels may also be bi-polar and I do not mean as in the Medical type, because when he and I communicate on this subject he well ...he ...Its mixed messages. Bobby6Sucks makes it clear that he was swindled out of money and such swindling is between him and Indy. He however publicly often reminds Indy of the Con/Swindle/Theft/

Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,252

@503,217 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)

> Oh, I think the other poster and I were talking about the $467.30 owed to protip. But okay.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,253

@previous (Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw)
Did you get hit up for cash on Ghoul?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 47 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,257

@503,087 (D)

> No contract. No signature. No documentation. No proof. No debt. Thanks.

I have some of that on my computer, ill post it later if I remember. Screen grabs of email between Matt and protip

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,267

@503,119 (Syntax)

> Looser~ann culture. Crime rate is very high and his own family is full of crooked er crooks. One can now say Fatfuck is a chip off the old block or like Father like Son.
>
> Ooooooops that needs edit. Fatfucks dad may be a low down dirty crook but there is no reason to believe he is a pedophile such as fatfuck is

what about father like daughter

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,271

@previous (L)
Marsden doesn't have a daughter.

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 37 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #503,273

@previous (M)

> Marsden doesn't have a daughter.

Syntax does.

Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,293

@previous (D)
Who said anything about Syntax? It's Matt and his father who have criminal records.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,294

@previous (M)
Syntax discovered Matts dad left his business with rent, telephone, and attorney bills unpaid for over 6 months.
15 registered scam business now closed. Public is now probably safe?

Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,295

@previous (N)
Who cares? If Matt had any balls he would have gone to California and kicked the old man's ass in person. Instead, fatty prefers to play armchair stalker. The poor, obese, sad sack of a man can't even stop obsessing over Syntax even while living halfway around the world.

I think fatfuck secretly admires Syntax.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,296

@503,087 (D)
False. Email contract without a signature needed.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,300

The last time these emails were posted MAtt cried about obsession. Normal people are able to keep email addresses alive for more than 2 years at a time and most people keep records of their financial dealings.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/ReidParhamPersonalBackup/legal/matt/matthew-rosteet-miller-debts.tgz

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,322

@503,296 (O)
@previous (P)
Protip cancelled the debt years ago. Thanks.

The Detector !nxpTnibHws replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,326

@previous (D)
Shtick.

Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,333

@503,322 (D)
Proof?

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,334

The Detector !nxpTnibHws replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,336

@previous (Q)
Proof!

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,360

@503,334 (Q)
@previous (The Detector !nxpTnibHws)
Dox, stalking, harassment.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,362

@503,087 (D)

> No contract. No signature. No documentation. No proof. No debt. Thanks.

@previous (D)

> Dox, stalking, harassment.

Asshole, you made the request for proof.

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,363

@previous (R)
Exactly.
He cannot complain after telling everyone, there is no documentation or proof.

Anonymous Q replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,367

Original agreement?

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,393

@previous (Q)
No shit more documentation LOL

Most excellent

Anonymous Q replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,394

@previous (Syntax)
I tried to censor some of it because you are a massive stalker.

Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,424

@503,322 (D)
Under duress from your harassment

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,428

@previous (O)
Never happened. Thanks.

Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,440

@previous (D)
You called Protip and threatened to rip his head off and shit down his neck.

Anonymous Q replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,444

@previous (M)
That was Duke Nukem, actually.

Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,445

@previous (Q)
Or Evel Knievel.

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,516

@503,440 (M)
No, but I had a good laugh when his wife Remy allowed another man to slide his rock-hard penis into her moist, yawning vagina. Thanks.

Anonymous D double-posted this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,517

@503,294 (N)

> Syntax discovered Matts dad left his business with rent, telephone, and attorney bills unpaid for over 6 months.

Clear evidence that Syntax is a creepy old stalker.

Anonymous P replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,522

@503,516 (D)
> being this mad

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,527

@previous (P)
Protip was mad. Thanks.

Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,535

@previous (D)
Hmm you seem to remember this differently than everybody else

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,536

@previous (O)
Nah.

Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,541

@503,516 (D)
Was this before or after your grandmother's funeral?

Anonymous K replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,554

@503,516 (D)
Posting about renny pornhammer results in a ban, because Reid is a special snowflake who needs extra protection when posting on chans

Anonymous Q replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,773

@previous (K)
AC is an important man here on Minichan, so he is not allowed to be attacked. Try to limit your schtick attacks to less relevant posters. Thanks.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.