Topic: Syntax has gone off the freaking deep end.
Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #37,184
He used to be funny and quaint, with his meaningless ramblings. But lately, he has gone batshit crazy, totally off the deep end. I doubt the poor old guy can even dress himself anymore.
Dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later[^] [v] #502,813
shut up matt
Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,814
@opSince when have you ever said I B ?
> funny and quaint
Never Ever not once in 20... nor did you even try to hide ur text speak. Dw picked you out more easy then he can pick out Belgium Fry's from cup.
Now calm down and check with family members so you can get an address of dad on run from law IRS and bill collector...Dad who b in much need of some cold hard cash Quickly. Perhaps you can send him some of that take out Chinese food.
A bowl of Crossing the bridge noodles, with those er raw veggies. Best bleach the hell out of them to kill horrid organisms albeit the nasty chemicals farmers are allowed to apply topically including legal DDT, do not wash off so easy nor bleach works.
Them Rice noodles u get locally. Photo says it all. One wood think people wood wash shoes b4 stepping all over noodles.
On 2nd thought u best send Dad a can of Spam.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,836
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,842
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,847
@502,814 (Syntax)
wait a minute. you mean the Nike noodles i've been eating weren't stamped with a name brand on purpose? well fuck.
wait a minute. you mean the Nike noodles i've been eating weren't stamped with a name brand on purpose? well fuck.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,848
@previous (squeegee)
LoL - Off to a Taco Tuesday thang for just a quick taste
Very funny reply squeegee. FOR THOSE WHO DID not click on pic - U really should.
OUT of here for Tacos
LoL - Off to a Taco Tuesday thang for just a quick taste
Very funny reply squeegee. FOR THOSE WHO DID not click on pic - U really should.
OUT of here for Tacos
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,859
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,885
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,886
@previous (Syntax)
So, you wrote literally every article, tens of thousands of them, in their politics and tech sections?
So, you wrote literally every article, tens of thousands of them, in their politics and tech sections?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 53 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,887
@502,885 (Syntax)
So, you wrote literally every article, tens of thousands of them, in their politics and tech sections?
So, you wrote literally every article, tens of thousands of them, in their politics and tech sections?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 19 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,888
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,937
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,008
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,015
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,017
@previous (H)
Syntax is. He claims to have defrauded the government over tax issues. His daily lies are just because he has no self esteem like Matt.
Syntax is. He claims to have defrauded the government over tax issues. His daily lies are just because he has no self esteem like Matt.
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,024
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,026
syntax is a fake, a fraud, and a fucking faggot
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,343
> Similar to laws that make it illegal to Gamble on USA Pres race IN the USA but ok if you do it offshore from USA. Buttt not ok to transfer Money Toooooo the offshore Gamble house like Intrade. But IF one has off shore account at bank like Romeny had or Vodaphone set up for me then its 100% legal to transfer funds from say France to Intrade in Ireland.
> Funny how since IRS wants its cut it legal to move that money Won and I did at 2:1 odds from Ireland to my B of A account multiple times a day. LAW Very tricky. Law works for you IF you know how to work that law in favor of your side.
> Funny how since IRS wants its cut it legal to move that money Won and I did at 2:1 odds from Ireland to my B of A account multiple times a day. LAW Very tricky. Law works for you IF you know how to work that law in favor of your side.
Anonymous I double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,344
> Reminds me of the tyme I sat before a table filled with the best n brightest legal advisers available on one area of the law and stated my needs. They heeemmmmed and hawwwwed for about one hour and asked me to step outside
> On return they informed me that they could NOT advise me cause to do so wood mean they wood be breaking the law. Then they went into Hypothetical dis n dat. You know Hypothetically if we were to tell you xyxn a that would be illegal advise.
> I got wot I needed and in fact for a business reason I did break IRS laws. Butttttttt I dictated a letter and in person handed that letter over to the IRS agent in charge and that letter detailed how I was about to break several IRS regulations but my intent was to make it all ok and pay any and all fines assigned. That letter did the trick.
> I think it cost me 25% more money but by doing wot I did I saved a ton of money and got piece of mind plus a small business victory. Hell I broke a ton of IRS regulations to build a business and then IRS got one hell of a lot more then If I had just let the company go belly up.
> You can break the law but one must have the law on ones side to win and be free or more then free
> On return they informed me that they could NOT advise me cause to do so wood mean they wood be breaking the law. Then they went into Hypothetical dis n dat. You know Hypothetically if we were to tell you xyxn a that would be illegal advise.
> I got wot I needed and in fact for a business reason I did break IRS laws. Butttttttt I dictated a letter and in person handed that letter over to the IRS agent in charge and that letter detailed how I was about to break several IRS regulations but my intent was to make it all ok and pay any and all fines assigned. That letter did the trick.
> I think it cost me 25% more money but by doing wot I did I saved a ton of money and got piece of mind plus a small business victory. Hell I broke a ton of IRS regulations to build a business and then IRS got one hell of a lot more then If I had just let the company go belly up.
> You can break the law but one must have the law on ones side to win and be free or more then free
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,352
@503,343 (I)
When the rubber meets the road. As long as the IRS gets their cut with complete Transparent documentation, they are happy and stay quiet. Actually Audits are a pain in the ass, because they eat up tyme and I never go in without a great CPA/Attorney who used to be an IRS agent. That is not a friendship kind of thing because I pay a hefty fee WHICH the IRS allows to be deducted.
The good news is that only once did an audit cost me $$$ and that was a divorce thing I did on purpose - That is I failed to file a tax return two years in a row AND wrote the IRS and told them about my plan and my willingness to pay on demand. It frankly was one more way to beat Gloria Allred in a game of wits and I won and the interest and penalty were chump change.
Several other audits have resulted in more cash back for me
When the rubber meets the road. As long as the IRS gets their cut with complete Transparent documentation, they are happy and stay quiet. Actually Audits are a pain in the ass, because they eat up tyme and I never go in without a great CPA/Attorney who used to be an IRS agent. That is not a friendship kind of thing because I pay a hefty fee WHICH the IRS allows to be deducted.
The good news is that only once did an audit cost me $$$ and that was a divorce thing I did on purpose - That is I failed to file a tax return two years in a row AND wrote the IRS and told them about my plan and my willingness to pay on demand. It frankly was one more way to beat Gloria Allred in a game of wits and I won and the interest and penalty were chump change.
Several other audits have resulted in more cash back for me
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,353
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,356
Linda Ann Malin