Topic: The tranny list
Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #37,183
Please list posters, past and present that are or claim to be a tranny. It's for a homework assignment.
1. Catherine
2. Triptych
3. Vocalon
4. Autphag
5. Brie
6. TGcomix
7. Green
8. Hamfist
9. Ninjj
That's a lot of pre op/no op trannys posting, are there others?
1. Catherine
2. Triptych
3. Vocalon
4. Autphag
5. Brie
6. TGcomix
7. Green
8. Hamfist
9. Ninjj
That's a lot of pre op/no op trannys posting, are there others?
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later[^] [v] #502,779
My mother now knows I want a sex change.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #502,780
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Oh she's had her suspicions for a while buddy, don't worry about that.
Oh she's had her suspicions for a while buddy, don't worry about that.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #502,781
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,782
10. Syntax
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,793
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,802
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,804
I’m not sure why ninjj is on the list.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,805
And so much
autism! What is the connection?
autism! What is the connection?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 54 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,810
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 56 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,812
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,818
Tranny list, is it like Schindler list?
Green is not a tranny, the Green/Bella duality is deeper than just gender dysphoria
Green is not a tranny, the Green/Bella duality is deeper than just gender dysphoria
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 49 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,822
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 46 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,824
@502,812 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
No woman should be forced to live with a physical deformity, just because she happened to born with it.
No woman should be forced to live with a physical deformity, just because she happened to born with it.
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 26 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,833
@previous (K)
I agree. So the government should pay for all cosmetic surgeries. But only for woman.
Ps, your statement wasnt relevant to mine. Thanks.
I agree. So the government should pay for all cosmetic surgeries. But only for woman.
Ps, your statement wasnt relevant to mine. Thanks.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,835
Anonymous K replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,844
@502,833 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
Yes, universal healthcare should pay for any surgery an individual and a doctor deem to be necessary. BTW it's not "cosmetic" surgery. And yes, my respond was relevant to your post. You seem to find it necessary to take cheap shots at trans-women, and that's what I was responding to.
Yes, universal healthcare should pay for any surgery an individual and a doctor deem to be necessary. BTW it's not "cosmetic" surgery. And yes, my respond was relevant to your post. You seem to find it necessary to take cheap shots at trans-women, and that's what I was responding to.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,846
meh, trans, not trans, people can do whatever they want around me. i don't care.
doesn't effect me one way or the other.
doesn't effect me one way or the other.
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,849
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,850
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 58 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,851
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 52 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,852
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,853
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,854
@previous (B)
Its relevant to you because you're autistic. Please tell us the definition of cosmetic surgery.
Its relevant to you because you're autistic. Please tell us the definition of cosmetic surgery.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,855
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,856
@previous (B)
No, buy it does render you unable to understand other peoples intents, and also it makes you notice irrelevant patterns. When you only feel empathy for trans women, and not trans men or females, your autism is showing.
No, buy it does render you unable to understand other peoples intents, and also it makes you notice irrelevant patterns. When you only feel empathy for trans women, and not trans men or females, your autism is showing.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 7 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,904
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,925
You should probably add bobby2sox to the list.
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,953
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,002
@502,856 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> >Autism does not mean "people you dislike or disagree with"
> No, but it does render you unable to understand other peoples intents
You're missing something obvious. When most people on the chans dislike or disagree with someone else and also don't understand their intents, instead of trying to understand them, they go "You're autistic."
> >Autism does not mean "people you dislike or disagree with"
> No, but it does render you unable to understand other peoples intents
You're missing something obvious. When most people on the chans dislike or disagree with someone else and also don't understand their intents, instead of trying to understand them, they go "You're autistic."
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,027
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #503,080
triptych is a girl
Anonymous L replied with this 12 years ago, 16 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,256
@503,002 (P)
Your're autism is flaring up.
@503,027 (F)
So that's why he's on the list.
@previous (Q)
Not for long
Your're autism is flaring up.
@503,027 (F)
So that's why he's on the list.
@previous (Q)
Not for long
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,283
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,304
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,305
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,377
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,398
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,404
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,448
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,463
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,465
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,468
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,725
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,728
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,783
@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
Not talking about something when its not relevant to their discussion is not the same as not caring.
Axe to grind lmao
Not talking about something when its not relevant to their discussion is not the same as not caring.
Axe to grind lmao
Soph joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,787
@previous (G)
> Axe to grind
When has Kook ever not had?
Her two motivations for argument are vindiction and vindication.
> Axe to grind
When has Kook ever not had?
Her two motivations for argument are vindiction and vindication.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,888
@504,783 (G)
It should be relevant. When discussion of trans people never involves trans men (females) it once again shows a form of misogyny prevalent even among the "enlightened ones".
It should be relevant. When discussion of trans people never involves trans men (females) it once again shows a form of misogyny prevalent even among the "enlightened ones".
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,891
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,892
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,894
And Postmortem!kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,941
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,942
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,943
@504,888 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> It should be relevant. When discussion of trans people never involves trans men (females) it once again shows a form of misogyny prevalent even among the "enlightened ones".
Honestly I don't know what you're going for with this. You literally just referred to men as females. Way to work against your cause.
> It should be relevant. When discussion of trans people never involves trans men (females) it once again shows a form of misogyny prevalent even among the "enlightened ones".
Honestly I don't know what you're going for with this. You literally just referred to men as females. Way to work against your cause.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc double-posted this 12 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,944
@504,888 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Like there's an easy answer for why trans men aren't included when subjects like misogyny come up - and it's because men don't experience misogyny.
Like there's an easy answer for why trans men aren't included when subjects like misogyny come up - and it's because men don't experience misogyny.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,945
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
I also find it strange why Kook, in all of her negrotypical dyslogic, decided to co-opt as women those who had turned their backs on the matriarchy in the ultimate act of "misogyny" to begin with.
I also find it strange why Kook, in all of her negrotypical dyslogic, decided to co-opt as women those who had turned their backs on the matriarchy in the ultimate act of "misogyny" to begin with.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,946
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,947
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,948
kook !!32zdfdzi+ triple-posted this 12 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,949
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,950
@504,948 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Let us not forget that those who bear the XX chromosome of the Eurasian raced are, by virtue of their evolved neuromasculinity, men whether they like it or not, thus have no special claim to a persecution complex under the guise of perceived 'misogyny.'
Let us not forget that those who bear the XX chromosome of the Eurasian raced are, by virtue of their evolved neuromasculinity, men whether they like it or not, thus have no special claim to a persecution complex under the guise of perceived 'misogyny.'
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,951
@504,947 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Why would trans men be female?
@504,948 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> Females of any gender
???? Like I know you're completely fucking out of the loop when it comes to gender stuff but this is a new low.
Why would trans men be female?
@504,948 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> Females of any gender
???? Like I know you're completely fucking out of the loop when it comes to gender stuff but this is a new low.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,952
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Why would trans men be female? What in the fuck are you talking about?
Please, pull up the definition of the word female.
female is not a gender, and people of the female sex may be of any gender or associate with none of them.
Why would trans men be female? What in the fuck are you talking about?
Please, pull up the definition of the word female.
female is not a gender, and people of the female sex may be of any gender or associate with none of them.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,953
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,954
@504,952 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
There is no such thing as the 'female sex', neurobiologically speaking, in Eurasian race peoples; if you are then you're actually a negroid, a throwback to a time when all brains were female.
There is no such thing as the 'female sex', neurobiologically speaking, in Eurasian race peoples; if you are then you're actually a negroid, a throwback to a time when all brains were female.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,955
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,956
@504,953 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Indeed, no white person of either 'sex', the preponderance of feminist exceptionalism notwithstanding.
Indeed, no white person of either 'sex', the preponderance of feminist exceptionalism notwithstanding.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,957
Vocalon, does everyone have a gender?
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 12 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,958
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,959
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,960
!OhBrie5EHg replied with this 12 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,961
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,962
Vocalon, do non human animals have genders?
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,963
@504,952 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Lmao. "Look it up in the dictionary" Who writes the dictionary? Who edits it? Certainly not trans people.
Why go through all the effort of defending men under your warped definition of misogyny when you could defend trans women?
Lmao. "Look it up in the dictionary" Who writes the dictionary? Who edits it? Certainly not trans people.
Why go through all the effort of defending men under your warped definition of misogyny when you could defend trans women?
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,964
@504,959 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
There is a radical feminist matriarchal oligarchy that perpetuates manufactured transphobia from false-flag pressure group "opponents" in order to recruit the transpeople's support as a strong-arm to enforce the culture of the public woman and the privilege that entails, but no, indeed, there can be no misogyny cis or trans, for there can be nothing but privilege entailed in the parasitic existence females lead requiring nothing outwith external appearance and hypergamic arbitration to reap its fruits.
There is a radical feminist matriarchal oligarchy that perpetuates manufactured transphobia from false-flag pressure group "opponents" in order to recruit the transpeople's support as a strong-arm to enforce the culture of the public woman and the privilege that entails, but no, indeed, there can be no misogyny cis or trans, for there can be nothing but privilege entailed in the parasitic existence females lead requiring nothing outwith external appearance and hypergamic arbitration to reap its fruits.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,965
@504,963 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
wtf? WHO WROTE THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE? CERTAINLY NOT TRANS PEOPLE. WHO STUDIES BIOLOGY? CERTAINLY NOT TRANS PEOPLE. LOL
wtf? WHO WROTE THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE? CERTAINLY NOT TRANS PEOPLE. WHO STUDIES BIOLOGY? CERTAINLY NOT TRANS PEOPLE. LOL
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,966
kook !!32zdfdzi+ triple-posted this 12 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,967
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 second later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,968
@504,963 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Nobody 'writes' the dictionary you moron, it's a reference, built upon previous references, recording pre-existing etymologies of the semantics of words long established by the language's popular use.
Nobody 'writes' the dictionary you moron, it's a reference, built upon previous references, recording pre-existing etymologies of the semantics of words long established by the language's popular use.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,969
I'm screencapping this shit.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,970
@504,966 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
You have all the reading comprehension of a negroid; consumer slavery built upon forced welfare dependency by matriarchy-manufactured disability-via-neglect (call it Aspergers and make it coincidentally contain all the features women selected for prior to feminism's emergence) is not a form of parasitism, it services you by default, allowing the patriarchy to capitulate its rightful share of power by defaulting on the legitimacy your expectations had loaned it.
You have all the reading comprehension of a negroid; consumer slavery built upon forced welfare dependency by matriarchy-manufactured disability-via-neglect (call it Aspergers and make it coincidentally contain all the features women selected for prior to feminism's emergence) is not a form of parasitism, it services you by default, allowing the patriarchy to capitulate its rightful share of power by defaulting on the legitimacy your expectations had loaned it.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,971
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,972
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,973
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,974
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
You're not being serious. I tried that tactic with Syntax earlier, and your application of it is transparent as fuck.
You're not being serious. I tried that tactic with Syntax earlier, and your application of it is transparent as fuck.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,975
@504,963 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
I cant call my genitalia a vagina, because trans people didnt come up with that name.
I cant call my genitalia a vagina, because trans people didnt come up with that name.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,976
@504,965 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
http://www.insufferableintolerance.com/radical-feminism-is-a-danger-to-women/
http://www.insufferableintolerance.com/radical-feminism-is-a-danger-to-women/
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,977
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,978
"The gun is good, the penis is evil!" - kook probably
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,979
@504,976 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Its isnt my job, or any females job to protect males (you) from other males.
Its isnt my job, or any females job to protect males (you) from other males.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,980
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,981
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 second later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,982
Vocalon, do non human animals have genders?
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,983
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,984
@504,979 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> defaulting on the social contract which permitted matriarchy to thrive under patriarchy's auspices in the first place
John Locke is rolling in his grave.
> defaulting on the social contract which permitted matriarchy to thrive under patriarchy's auspices in the first place
John Locke is rolling in his grave.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,985
@504,983 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
"Well I don't go by the tranny dictionary, so I'm going to continue to support violence against women."
"Well I don't go by the tranny dictionary, so I'm going to continue to support violence against women."
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,986
@504,984 (Soph)
I dont care. I'm not going to try and lump males who feel like women, into the group of females, in order to protect them from other males.
I dont care. I'm not going to try and lump males who feel like women, into the group of females, in order to protect them from other males.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,987
@504,985 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
The concept of 'woman' is a delusional artifice ~ some paraphrasing of Nietzsche
The concept of 'woman' is a delusional artifice ~ some paraphrasing of Nietzsche
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,988
@504,985 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Violence by males against other males. Talk to your fellow males, and fix this problem amongst yourselves.
Violence by males against other males. Talk to your fellow males, and fix this problem amongst yourselves.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,989
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
The hypergamic expectations of women upward-regulate such competitive behaviour, you fool.
The whole 'female sex' should just commit mass pact suicide so that man may get on with his progress. Stop suppressing artificial methods of disseminating progeny and then we can do away with you altogether.
The hypergamic expectations of women upward-regulate such competitive behaviour, you fool.
The whole 'female sex' should just commit mass pact suicide so that man may get on with his progress. Stop suppressing artificial methods of disseminating progeny and then we can do away with you altogether.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,990
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,991
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,992
@504,982 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
You'll find most non-human animals aren't sentient.
And you'll also find that even insects have non-binary gender.
Let's take bees - you should know that. There's three types. Worker, drone, and queen.
Each one has a different purpose and function and as such have different genitalia.
Yet most articles write off drone bees as male because they have genitals that resemble (note "resemble" not "are") penises.
Or amoeba - they reproduce asexually. Which one is the male and which one is the female, kook? There's only one, so choose wisely.
You'll find most non-human animals aren't sentient.
And you'll also find that even insects have non-binary gender.
Let's take bees - you should know that. There's three types. Worker, drone, and queen.
Each one has a different purpose and function and as such have different genitalia.
Yet most articles write off drone bees as male because they have genitals that resemble (note "resemble" not "are") penises.
Or amoeba - they reproduce asexually. Which one is the male and which one is the female, kook? There's only one, so choose wisely.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,993
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Those arent genders! Why should it matter if they are sentient?! Wait, where did you get this information, did a tranny write it?
Those arent genders! Why should it matter if they are sentient?! Wait, where did you get this information, did a tranny write it?
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,994
@504,989 (Soph)
Are you just googling big words and putting them in a text post? Half the shit you're saying makes no goddamn sense whatsoever.
Are you just googling big words and putting them in a text post? Half the shit you're saying makes no goddamn sense whatsoever.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,995
Only respond to me using sources written by trans people. Thanks,.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,996
@504,993 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Where's your "men are females!" argument? Did I strike a nerve or something? :(
Where's your "men are females!" argument? Did I strike a nerve or something? :(
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,997
@504,991 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
My sex/gender is irrelevant. I am hypermale (Eurasian) as are you and any post-negroid.
My sex/gender is irrelevant. I am hypermale (Eurasian) as are you and any post-negroid.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,998
@504,986 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
"I'm not going to protect trans women because penises are gross despite modern medicine being able to make trans women completely indistinguishable from cis women, but I'll defend the men with ovaries because genitals are much more important than people." - kook probably
"I'm not going to protect trans women because penises are gross despite modern medicine being able to make trans women completely indistinguishable from cis women, but I'll defend the men with ovaries because genitals are much more important than people." - kook probably
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #504,999
@504,996 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Animals arent men or women! Genders dont exist in non human animals you fool. Show me where you got that bee analogy, and if it wasnt written by a trans person, it doesnt count.
Animals arent men or women! Genders dont exist in non human animals you fool. Show me where you got that bee analogy, and if it wasnt written by a trans person, it doesnt count.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,000
@504,994 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
That's because you're a failed, pseudo-autistic (read: misdiagnosed retard) excuse for a human lacking the verbal skills to fully comprehend higher-order material.
That's because you're a failed, pseudo-autistic (read: misdiagnosed retard) excuse for a human lacking the verbal skills to fully comprehend higher-order material.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,001
@504,998 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Genitals are part of people and most males (you) will never have surgery to take away their males sex organs. They just call themselves women over the internet, and expect to be let into women's spaces.
Genitals are part of people and most males (you) will never have surgery to take away their males sex organs. They just call themselves women over the internet, and expect to be let into women's spaces.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,002
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,003
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Answer me this: did you learn your rhetoric from r/SRS? That might explain your lack of reading and annoying attempts to come off as reasonable and intelligent.
Answer me this: did you learn your rhetoric from r/SRS? That might explain your lack of reading and annoying attempts to come off as reasonable and intelligent.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,004
vocalon, you are a male. Even if you grow long hair, wear makeup, and change your pronouns, you will still be a male. Thats okay! Males can enjoy those things,and still have a grasp on reality.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,005
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,006
@505,001 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Y'know why most trans women don't have the surgery?
Their life expectancy is 30 to 32, and the odds of being killed are on average 1 in 12 in comparison to the average one in 6100.
There are your sources, sweetie. :)
Y'know why most trans women don't have the surgery?
Their life expectancy is 30 to 32, and the odds of being killed are on average 1 in 12 in comparison to the average one in 6100.
There are your sources, sweetie. :)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,007
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Wait, so you're saying that they all just die before they can have surgery?
Its sad that so many males (you) decide to kill other males for not obeying the status quo.
Wait, so you're saying that they all just die before they can have surgery?
Its sad that so many males (you) decide to kill other males for not obeying the status quo.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,008
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,009
@505,006 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
That might just say they're transnegroids rather than transwomen. The teachings of David Chac impart that all effeminacy is not a distinct neurological gender but the absence of one from lagging evolution; a certain, small group of proletarian, effete, short-statured males had simply followed the Aryans on their migratory path into the Eurasian world without actually having been touched environmentally by the new challenges presented there, instead reaping the fruits of neurological-hypermale (Aryan) toil. These genetic inferiors were precursors to the Celtic underclass, which seem to comprise most of the 'transsexual' contingent, having a history of matriarchal beta-orbiting dating back to Boudikka.
That might just say they're transnegroids rather than transwomen. The teachings of David Chac impart that all effeminacy is not a distinct neurological gender but the absence of one from lagging evolution; a certain, small group of proletarian, effete, short-statured males had simply followed the Aryans on their migratory path into the Eurasian world without actually having been touched environmentally by the new challenges presented there, instead reaping the fruits of neurological-hypermale (Aryan) toil. These genetic inferiors were precursors to the Celtic underclass, which seem to comprise most of the 'transsexual' contingent, having a history of matriarchal beta-orbiting dating back to Boudikka.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,010
@505,007 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Additionally, transition costs over tens of thousands of dollars, as well as trans people inherently making less due to wage gaps.
So that's why there are so many no-op trans women. Because there's a system built against trans women, and it just so happens it's the same system that stops cis women as well.
Additionally, transition costs over tens of thousands of dollars, as well as trans people inherently making less due to wage gaps.
So that's why there are so many no-op trans women. Because there's a system built against trans women, and it just so happens it's the same system that stops cis women as well.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,011
@505,005 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
I was under delusions about what it had meant to be female, taken by the propaganda that they were a genetic aristocracy.
I was under delusions about what it had meant to be female, taken by the propaganda that they were a genetic aristocracy.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,012
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,013
@505,006 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Did you drop out of school so that you would have at least a decade left of fucking around, before you get murdered?
Did you drop out of school so that you would have at least a decade left of fucking around, before you get murdered?
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,014
@505,010 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
It just so happens. So males who act like females, also get treated like females? How shocking.
It just so happens. So males who act like females, also get treated like females? How shocking.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ triple-posted this 12 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,015
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,016
@505,013 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Kook, one of your alternate names should be rubber band because that's stretching.
Kook, one of your alternate names should be rubber band because that's stretching.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,017
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 second later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,018
@505,010 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
They make less because Hernstein found they had substantially lower IQs.
They make less because Hernstein found they had substantially lower IQs.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,019
@505,016 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
No it really isnt. You believe that you ( a male) are likely to be killed by other males for acting like a female.
No it really isnt. You believe that you ( a male) are likely to be killed by other males for acting like a female.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,021
@505,017 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Reading too many pornographic penny-terribles by radical feminists about the wonderous world of forced feminization.
Reading too many pornographic penny-terribles by radical feminists about the wonderous world of forced feminization.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,022
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,023
@505,019 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Why do you insist on calling women male?
Because it seems like a violation of fundamental logic, like women aren't men.
Source: I'm a biology teacher.
Why do you insist on calling women male?
Because it seems like a violation of fundamental logic, like women aren't men.
Source: I'm a biology teacher.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,024
@505,022 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Sites like StorySite, SissyKiss and Big Closet. It was probably my most deeply berried secret (running back to 2004 when I first came across a work by Christina Shelly on the first site mentioned) until this year.
Sites like StorySite, SissyKiss and Big Closet. It was probably my most deeply berried secret (running back to 2004 when I first came across a work by Christina Shelly on the first site mentioned) until this year.
Soph double-posted this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,026
@505,023 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Are you seriously trying to masquerade as a biology teacher whilst being a high school drop-out?
Are you seriously trying to masquerade as a biology teacher whilst being a high school drop-out?
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,027
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,028
@previous (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Minichan is a hive for communist degeneracy. It took a lot to swallow my pride and move on when banned from Tinychan, which has really turned into much of the same anyway, though the sanctimonious eejit Fuchs denies such.
Minichan is a hive for communist degeneracy. It took a lot to swallow my pride and move on when banned from Tinychan, which has really turned into much of the same anyway, though the sanctimonious eejit Fuchs denies such.
vocalon !74TdoRkjCc replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,029
@previous (Soph)
"Everything we feared about communism - that we would lose our houses and savings and be forced to labor eternally for meager wages with no voice in the system - has come true under capitalism."
"Everything we feared about communism - that we would lose our houses and savings and be forced to labor eternally for meager wages with no voice in the system - has come true under capitalism."
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,030
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,031
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,032
@505,029 (vocalon !74TdoRkjCc)
Someone can't distinguish corporatism from capitalism then.
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Yes and no. Some amazingly manage to con the system well enough to get real sex changes despite otherwise being autisic shut-ins and 'ascend' to this imagined radfem sexual-aristocracy. They have, as it's been revealed now and then, expressed regret about the decision but enjoy the bragging rights of being a true tranny or whatever.
@505,030 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
And I'm sorry that you're a cisnegroid
Someone can't distinguish corporatism from capitalism then.
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Yes and no. Some amazingly manage to con the system well enough to get real sex changes despite otherwise being autisic shut-ins and 'ascend' to this imagined radfem sexual-aristocracy. They have, as it's been revealed now and then, expressed regret about the decision but enjoy the bragging rights of being a true tranny or whatever.
@505,030 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
And I'm sorry that you're a cisnegroid
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,033
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,034
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Being autistic shut-in (therefore extreme male brain), the absence of a dick is probably the first conscious reminder that ever confronts them of the farce that was their coveting desire to obtain 'female privilege', and it actually serves to prove the matriarchy in action. The socio-political dynamics of Cogsdev (himself an autist self-delusionally deceiving oneself into being a tranny) heading a troll(shield)ing crew against Chris-chan (hypermale) follows more or less those same lines.
Being autistic shut-in (therefore extreme male brain), the absence of a dick is probably the first conscious reminder that ever confronts them of the farce that was their coveting desire to obtain 'female privilege', and it actually serves to prove the matriarchy in action. The socio-political dynamics of Cogsdev (himself an autist self-delusionally deceiving oneself into being a tranny) heading a troll(shield)ing crew against Chris-chan (hypermale) follows more or less those same lines.
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,035
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,037
So... if women are negroids, are black men less negroidal (ie more white) than black women? And what about Jews?
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,038
@previous (Metæ)
There's no (straightforward) gradation of neuro-sexuality within races; black men are therefore not neccessarily 'more hypermale' (actually the high aromatization rate of their already-elevated testosterone causes them to be even more feminine); there is only the neurological binary between those races evolving masculine, systematizing brains and the equatorial primitives who retain their 'spiritual' (disorganized schizoid) brains. Jews are definitely some awkward hybrid of both types.
I should quickly add that neuro-masculinity bares no relation to adult testosterone level but to pre-natal maternal testosterone and the sensitivity of androgen receptors within the brain, which is why bodily levels of testosterone in Mongoloids is so depleted.
There's no (straightforward) gradation of neuro-sexuality within races; black men are therefore not neccessarily 'more hypermale' (actually the high aromatization rate of their already-elevated testosterone causes them to be even more feminine); there is only the neurological binary between those races evolving masculine, systematizing brains and the equatorial primitives who retain their 'spiritual' (disorganized schizoid) brains. Jews are definitely some awkward hybrid of both types.
I should quickly add that neuro-masculinity bares no relation to adult testosterone level but to pre-natal maternal testosterone and the sensitivity of androgen receptors within the brain, which is why bodily levels of testosterone in Mongoloids is so depleted.
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,041
@previous (Soph)
No, I mean intraracially. Say you have a 100% pure Nigerian black man and black woman, born of the same parents. Which of the two is less negroidal?
No, I mean intraracially. Say you have a 100% pure Nigerian black man and black woman, born of the same parents. Which of the two is less negroidal?
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,042
@previous (Metæ)
I had specified what it'd mean intraracially for blacks. I'm surprised you've a college education with your reading comprehension.
I had specified what it'd mean intraracially for blacks. I'm surprised you've a college education with your reading comprehension.
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,043
@previous (Soph)
There are three possible answers: 1) the man 2) the woman 3) neither. Pick one. Thanks.
There are three possible answers: 1) the man 2) the woman 3) neither. Pick one. Thanks.
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,044
@previous (Metæ)
I'd set out all of the premises necessary for you to make the decision yourself. Which is the more feminine and thus the more negroidal? It's clearly spelt out for you, read my first two statements.
I'd set out all of the premises necessary for you to make the decision yourself. Which is the more feminine and thus the more negroidal? It's clearly spelt out for you, read my first two statements.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,045
@previous (Soph)
Well, you'll have to dumb it down for me cause I'm not smart enough. Which of the three is it? Man, woman, or neither?
Well, you'll have to dumb it down for me cause I'm not smart enough. Which of the three is it? Man, woman, or neither?
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,046
@previous (Metæ)
Strictly speaking on an intra-racial basis it's the woman, relatively speaking.
I'm aware I had said that there was an inter-racial paradigm between systemizing-brain races and schizoid-brain races so I could see why you might think 'neither' was a possibility, but within the constraints of your query, 'neither' couldn't be a possibility because considerations about other races could be ignored.
And I had already mentioned in a quite straightforward manner why high testosterone levels in negroid males either is squandered on the aromataze pathway to become estrogen or is eaten by the 5alpha-reductaze pathway to become neurotoxic di-hydroteststerone, both of which are schizomimetic neurotoxins.
Sorry for my hesitation in answering, I don't like having to spoon-feed people, as condescending as I might otherwise seem.
Strictly speaking on an intra-racial basis it's the woman, relatively speaking.
I'm aware I had said that there was an inter-racial paradigm between systemizing-brain races and schizoid-brain races so I could see why you might think 'neither' was a possibility, but within the constraints of your query, 'neither' couldn't be a possibility because considerations about other races could be ignored.
And I had already mentioned in a quite straightforward manner why high testosterone levels in negroid males either is squandered on the aromataze pathway to become estrogen or is eaten by the 5alpha-reductaze pathway to become neurotoxic di-hydroteststerone, both of which are schizomimetic neurotoxins.
Sorry for my hesitation in answering, I don't like having to spoon-feed people, as condescending as I might otherwise seem.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,048
Soph replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,073
@previous (Metæ)
All Eurasian race people irrespecive of physiological sex are effectively hypermale; it'd be the White woman.
To explain further why both black and White women are superior to the black man, it does not mean to say the same correlation between sex and negritude exists among all of each of the races; it would still be the case that the White man is of decreased negritude to the White woman by virtue of his superior seperation from instinct of his refined spiritual desires and needs (yes it is very similar to the Neitzchean overman, and it was in fact demonstrated that autists have superior delayed gratification; why they accumulate so much crap is actually a consequence of scraping away the few of their impoverished pennies to invest in their deepest interests -- Chris-chan was never impulse buying but had probably a massive to do list of stuff he could never dream of affording simultaneusly, to assume otherwise would be arbitrating on a mind we have no right in reading except that given by a bunch of arrogant Cohenite doctrinarians) caused by testosterone's up-regulation of pre-meditated focus by extending neuronal glial sling (in an environment free from estrogen dominance or dihydrotestosterone toxicity.) The same relationship of increased virilization and decreased negritude exists too for the Mongolians, and if anything, such a dimorphism in discipline is magnified.
All Eurasian race people irrespecive of physiological sex are effectively hypermale; it'd be the White woman.
To explain further why both black and White women are superior to the black man, it does not mean to say the same correlation between sex and negritude exists among all of each of the races; it would still be the case that the White man is of decreased negritude to the White woman by virtue of his superior seperation from instinct of his refined spiritual desires and needs (yes it is very similar to the Neitzchean overman, and it was in fact demonstrated that autists have superior delayed gratification; why they accumulate so much crap is actually a consequence of scraping away the few of their impoverished pennies to invest in their deepest interests -- Chris-chan was never impulse buying but had probably a massive to do list of stuff he could never dream of affording simultaneusly, to assume otherwise would be arbitrating on a mind we have no right in reading except that given by a bunch of arrogant Cohenite doctrinarians) caused by testosterone's up-regulation of pre-meditated focus by extending neuronal glial sling (in an environment free from estrogen dominance or dihydrotestosterone toxicity.) The same relationship of increased virilization and decreased negritude exists too for the Mongolians, and if anything, such a dimorphism in discipline is magnified.
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #505,080
niggersAnonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 months later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #518,867
Also, Ash Ketchup's on the list.
Meowth joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 days later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,297
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,425
swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,427
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
I was saying that most of the people on that list have autism, not all of them.
I was saying that most of the people on that list have autism, not all of them.
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,451
@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
You should probably use the word "most" in that case, or indicate it otherwise. The lack of said qualifier means you're blanketing all listed users as autistic...
You should probably use the word "most" in that case, or indicate it otherwise. The lack of said qualifier means you're blanketing all listed users as autistic...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,479
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
Ninjj probably isn't autistic or a tranny either. Just an easy target, like McWalter, who either wants to be on the list or fuck his way through the list I'm not sure.
Ninjj probably isn't autistic or a tranny either. Just an easy target, like McWalter, who either wants to be on the list or fuck his way through the list I'm not sure.
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 11 years ago, 11 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,619
@previous (A)
I agree!
My list of mental issues starts and ends with depression and will remain that way for the foreseeable future.
I agree!
My list of mental issues starts and ends with depression and will remain that way for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous Z-3 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #520,620
You forgot Syntax.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 day later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #521,001
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 months later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #580,897
10. Dead !Pool..v42sOr maybe thats 11 or 12, idk anymore. It's lots anyway.
Anonymous Z-4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #580,899
11. McWalter
Anonymous S replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #580,908
@580,897 (A)
This suggests a deeply autistic mindset.
Are you also a compulsive mattposter? Do you constantly repost the same tired schticks?
This suggests a deeply autistic mindset.
Are you also a compulsive mattposter? Do you constantly repost the same tired schticks?
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #581,037
I thought ninjj wasn't human so therefore the gender binary doesn't apply to it?
Anonymous Z-5 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #581,042
Anonymous Z-6 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 day later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #581,442
!LSD69pSotU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 months after the original post[^] [v] #581,551
itt autism