Topic: Yo anon C re Huffington Post
Syntax started this discussion 12 years ago #37,125
> As a fan and contributor (yes I pay an editor) of Huffington> contributor
> Post a link to one of your articles please. Don't ignore this and start senile rambling and posting shit you found on >wikipedia. You could just admit to being a liar and completely full of shit, but if you don't want to do that post a >link. Thanks
I guess I should have said - Yes all posts (minor exceptions when I reply) Posts go through editors I pay - One Technical editor because of course I do a fair amount of Technical posting (currently slowed down re SEC letter that slows me down)
And Politics.
All posted with a Nom de Plume. Which to meet ur request wood mean no more Nom de Plume.
That wood just not make sense - Comprendo?
Now is the tyme for all good men-women to hit the waves of Ocean a Blue ...which from my patio window looks FANTASTIC and ice clean conditions with just a teeny tiny offshore wind AND WATER IS HOT HOT HOT Like no kidding a full 70 degrees means NO Wet suit NO Rubber required
OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #502,516
Link us to just one article.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 42 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #502,518
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #502,519
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #502,520
@previous (B)
Matt memes are so funny! What's your favorite? MIne is And I Genuinely Feel Sorry For You xDDD
Matt memes are so funny! What's your favorite? MIne is And I Genuinely Feel Sorry For You xDDD
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,526
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
I prefer the Mc one. You'd think it would be worn out by now, but it's not.
I prefer the Mc one. You'd think it would be worn out by now, but it's not.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,535
why would anybody be surprised to find out that an senile illiterate minichan poster also writes for huff post? huff post is garbage toddlers could write for huff post
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,536
This is the worst lie yet.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,584
@OP
Which article? Tell us.
Which article? Tell us.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,590
@previous (Syntax)It is possible for people to locate the political ones IF they happen just happen to follow a political forum I post in which is not so much Nom de Plume. Some of the same topics with conclusions carry over. Its NOT that its such a big deal if I am outed but not long ago I caused Admins of Huffington grief re SEC knocking on their door to get my identity. I said no problem send them my way and my way they came but in Letters of warning ONLY. No in person visits. That is all about the Technical articles which unfortunately crossed over to investments.
Gets real sticky cause I have free access to labs with protypes of just about everything and anything in portable stuff about to be made by 95% of market. I have strong opinions about what I think will make it or will be a flop. BUTTT I have been wrong - Not often but when I make such mistrake its HUGE just Huge.
I am super careful not to share inside info about any company doing a new design cause the axe wood fall on me super fast at the Q. Nor share is that company or the competitor a good value re buying stock.
I CURRENTLY have one hell of an opinion about something BIG HUGE and its in general and can say this much. IF One looked at a number of companies and said HEY they should be out of business cause on paper its fail fail fail re incoming money on product.
Thinking about a company only worth 5 billion on paper and could fail YET if so then its worth 10X that much instantly. Thinking about another company that SHOULD fail and its worth on paper $25 Billion yet if it fails? I have no clue what its worth but its sure worth in many a multiple and in both cases the Worth has nada to do with office equip technical equip they have lying around or in fact direct tangible asset.
Word salad so no one will see this. Tiny hole in wall cellular companies have recently gone under yet cash turned over to by the intangibles are HUGE just Huge
Buttt I wood have ass in sling if I said much on Huffington. NOT that I am not free2 but it becomes an admin nightmare when attorneys have to look over laws on investing which is not really the kind of attorneys web sites have on staff.
Thank you for not reading
@502,516 (B)
lol and Nom de Plum is kaput
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,592
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 34 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,595
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,636
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 54 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,647
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #502,660
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,681
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Huffington_Post_writers_and_columnists
Which one is syntax?
Which one is syntax?
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,692
@502,660 (G)
Ask your Moms permission to ask me that again.
@previous (F)
wot? Wot? wot? I support wiki - Each tyme they ask me for money they get it. But clearly Wiki has a looong way to go to be up2date.
For instance early this AM just b4 Surfing my Ocean a Blue, I read/skimmed the politics page of Huffington. Lead blog article is by Pepe Escobar (not on wiki list)
LEAD ARTICLE is by Christina Wilkie, also not on that list. 2nd Lead Article is: EXCLUSIVE: Bill Maher on Islam spat with Ben Affleck: “We’re liberals! We’re not crazy tea-baggers”
by Elias Isquith, again NOT on that List. Yet on that list is...LoL and a Cousin of mine is on that list (Mom was last born of 18 kids - Lots n lots of Cousins) Several on that list are people I know in R/L and one has been a friend hiking and mountain climbing bud for years n years. Even becky could figure out who dat b.
Ask your Moms permission to ask me that again.
@previous (F)
wot? Wot? wot? I support wiki - Each tyme they ask me for money they get it. But clearly Wiki has a looong way to go to be up2date.
For instance early this AM just b4 Surfing my Ocean a Blue, I read/skimmed the politics page of Huffington. Lead blog article is by Pepe Escobar (not on wiki list)
LEAD ARTICLE is by Christina Wilkie, also not on that list. 2nd Lead Article is: EXCLUSIVE: Bill Maher on Islam spat with Ben Affleck: “We’re liberals! We’re not crazy tea-baggers”
by Elias Isquith, again NOT on that List. Yet on that list is...LoL and a Cousin of mine is on that list (Mom was last born of 18 kids - Lots n lots of Cousins) Several on that list are people I know in R/L and one has been a friend hiking and mountain climbing bud for years n years. Even becky could figure out who dat b.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,693
@previous (Syntax)
Please copy and paste the entire list of writers and columnists with your insight as to their current role(s).
Please copy and paste the entire list of writers and columnists with your insight as to their current role(s).
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,695
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,702
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,708
post one article instead of backpedaling because you constantly get called out on your bullshit old man
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,712
@502,702 (G)
@previous (K)
Currently I am being called out by a couple of people re proof I have that a certain someone ya no, ingests in quanity Raw Sewage. Quanity got that? Say let me make a new topic about - Hang on
Which should stop being called out on someThing important cause no way I giving up my Nom de Plume. To do so wood invite wankers of Chans 2 do arwful stuff to commentary etc. Kimmo trained n debrained Anons wood infect a quality rag of net. Not with my help - Besides I gave my WORD I would not share Nom de Plume without permission from the fyne person at Huffington who created it just for me.
@previous (K)
Currently I am being called out by a couple of people re proof I have that a certain someone ya no, ingests in quanity Raw Sewage. Quanity got that? Say let me make a new topic about - Hang on
Which should stop being called out on someThing important cause no way I giving up my Nom de Plume. To do so wood invite wankers of Chans 2 do arwful stuff to commentary etc. Kimmo trained n debrained Anons wood infect a quality rag of net. Not with my help - Besides I gave my WORD I would not share Nom de Plume without permission from the fyne person at Huffington who created it just for me.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,743
@previous (Syntax)
Liar. Everyone knew it would come to this. It's just another fantasy in the imaginary life of a foolish old man trying to impress anonymous posters on a chan.
Liar. Everyone knew it would come to this. It's just another fantasy in the imaginary life of a foolish old man trying to impress anonymous posters on a chan.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,746
@previous (L)Matt Matt Matt Matthew. I have one offer for editing so its going to happen. And U will shit about shit. HowSomEver I am NOT BS'sing
So again be prepared to be sliced n diced just as I did recently re new dox on your Felon Daddy. On the run currently from past due rent and past do electrical and past DUE IRS as U U U LoL
Syntax (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,747
@502,743 (L)
Oh I C I was going to do a topic asking if anyone wants to edit and or play editor or even Managing editor is open
Oh I C I was going to do a topic asking if anyone wants to edit and or play editor or even Managing editor is open
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,748
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,751
@previous (G)
The very same way you can verify the following
I R alive
I work for a living which an be verified
I have the ultimate credit rating which just about anyone with a few dollars or an business account can verify often at no charge
The same way you all have verified I actually do go out a great deal to clubs n events which cannot be denied eh (and even at that the basement dwellers make fun of such)
But Y all this concern about who/whom I rite4? Its not like u going to see my Dyslexic style. What is the big deal? U yes U yes just about anyone can add content to say a blog. Anyone is free to submit an idea for a blog or even Rite on Spec and submit article. I was invited as result of a conference I attended and hummmmmmmmm that was a Ted Conference where Moot was a featured speaker - He and I are currently at each others throats re some net jabs n digs. I came away making a few bucks and Moot came away losing some money on the deal
However IF you really really need to find wot I rote? If it were ME looking at wot u rote I bet I could. Shoot I just proved on paper a poster here eats shit on purpose and is upset he has invited me to prove that I can prove it. (U betcha I can) Call me out on it if I fail to deliver
Say did you get the update on Matts dad? If you want to find something truly a click away as the other day I found Matts dad on the run.
I Def~Gress sorry
The very same way you can verify the following
I R alive
I work for a living which an be verified
I have the ultimate credit rating which just about anyone with a few dollars or an business account can verify often at no charge
The same way you all have verified I actually do go out a great deal to clubs n events which cannot be denied eh (and even at that the basement dwellers make fun of such)
But Y all this concern about who/whom I rite4? Its not like u going to see my Dyslexic style. What is the big deal? U yes U yes just about anyone can add content to say a blog. Anyone is free to submit an idea for a blog or even Rite on Spec and submit article. I was invited as result of a conference I attended and hummmmmmmmm that was a Ted Conference where Moot was a featured speaker - He and I are currently at each others throats re some net jabs n digs. I came away making a few bucks and Moot came away losing some money on the deal
However IF you really really need to find wot I rote? If it were ME looking at wot u rote I bet I could. Shoot I just proved on paper a poster here eats shit on purpose and is upset he has invited me to prove that I can prove it. (U betcha I can) Call me out on it if I fail to deliver
Say did you get the update on Matts dad? If you want to find something truly a click away as the other day I found Matts dad on the run.
I Def~Gress sorry
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,772
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,776
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,778
@previous (F)
He also has a large stash of stalker info about Matt from a decade ago, and apparently is now stalking his family members too. That should also be enough proof of writing for the Huffington Post!
He also has a large stash of stalker info about Matt from a decade ago, and apparently is now stalking his family members too. That should also be enough proof of writing for the Huffington Post!
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #502,784
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,786
@502,772 (M)
C if I were2 If I could YOU Yes U wood call wot I rite garbage/trash no matter how good bad or indifferent it b. I have feelings u no and on the politics side of Huffington WHERE its at where really when it cums down 2it dat is what that Rag is all about.
Yes it does my ego good to be an obscure riter among a C of really good ritters. Alas I R betting none of them need the crutch I need to over cum my Dyslexia aka Editors. EXCEPT several of them HAVE STAFF Ritters to help and even a couple have a large number of paid on board Staff to assist in research. I have none of that OTHER then on occasion a friend who does a lot of Editting for me well she does offer up counter arguments and suggestions and submits her additions to me and YES I no fool and include them AND IF she were to want to join the team on her own she is free to say HEY Include me as co-ritter. Shoot if she were EVER to add nuff content of her own that makes the article her own - My Ego is such that I wood move over and let her be only author.
Oh and any future researcher here wood find it very easy to locate just who is doing the non technical edditing IF I add she used to work for Simon in New York City ya No the one with the daughter who did a great put down of Rod in a famous Song long b4 sum of u were born
Surf AIN'T all that much UP but take a look IF Ads don't mess with ya and C me with NO NO NO wet suite do wot I can with the little that nature gives me for next 3 hours
http://www.surfline.com/surf-report/swamis-southern-california_4789/
Have a patio cam that switches in but fog tends to gum it up of late for these add free shots
http://www.surfline.com/surf-report/swamis-southern-california_4789/
C ya in 3.5 or 5 or so hours
Later Gators
@502,778 (H)
It's not stalking or harassment to try and keep the Internet free from crime.
@502,776 (F)
I Put that in there cause of much its the easiest thing to Dox verify re me. I R 100% sure someone here has access for free to check this out with all the info needed to do so. Plus it feeds my Ego and Ego good 2b fed and dank ya for the
> Can you not read? He has the ultimate credit rating. That's all the proof you need.
OH ONE LAST THING I really really REALLY REALLY Do need a Guest Editor in the next few days. Want to test out your Inglish skills? And YOU can even get credit as Editor or more cause my Ego allows sharing when quality is added as value to my Dyslexic Inglish
@previous (G)
Yes of course just go back a few days n read archives and locate a clean up version of my text speek
C if I were2 If I could YOU Yes U wood call wot I rite garbage/trash no matter how good bad or indifferent it b. I have feelings u no and on the politics side of Huffington WHERE its at where really when it cums down 2it dat is what that Rag is all about.
Yes it does my ego good to be an obscure riter among a C of really good ritters. Alas I R betting none of them need the crutch I need to over cum my Dyslexia aka Editors. EXCEPT several of them HAVE STAFF Ritters to help and even a couple have a large number of paid on board Staff to assist in research. I have none of that OTHER then on occasion a friend who does a lot of Editting for me well she does offer up counter arguments and suggestions and submits her additions to me and YES I no fool and include them AND IF she were to want to join the team on her own she is free to say HEY Include me as co-ritter. Shoot if she were EVER to add nuff content of her own that makes the article her own - My Ego is such that I wood move over and let her be only author.
Oh and any future researcher here wood find it very easy to locate just who is doing the non technical edditing IF I add she used to work for Simon in New York City ya No the one with the daughter who did a great put down of Rod in a famous Song long b4 sum of u were born
Surf AIN'T all that much UP but take a look IF Ads don't mess with ya and C me with NO NO NO wet suite do wot I can with the little that nature gives me for next 3 hours
http://www.surfline.com/surf-report/swamis-southern-california_4789/
Have a patio cam that switches in but fog tends to gum it up of late for these add free shots
http://www.surfline.com/surf-report/swamis-southern-california_4789/
C ya in 3.5 or 5 or so hours
Later Gators
@502,778 (H)
It's not stalking or harassment to try and keep the Internet free from crime.
@502,776 (F)
I Put that in there cause of much its the easiest thing to Dox verify re me. I R 100% sure someone here has access for free to check this out with all the info needed to do so. Plus it feeds my Ego and Ego good 2b fed and dank ya for the
> Can you not read? He has the ultimate credit rating. That's all the proof you need.
OH ONE LAST THING I really really REALLY REALLY Do need a Guest Editor in the next few days. Want to test out your Inglish skills? And YOU can even get credit as Editor or more cause my Ego allows sharing when quality is added as value to my Dyslexic Inglish
@previous (G)
Yes of course just go back a few days n read archives and locate a clean up version of my text speek
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,823
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,827
@previous (F)
We can discuss via PM - I keep getting offers to edit via PM's but so far that is about it WHEN I ask them Who are you.
Nor is it like I am worried about Matt getting ahold of the material in advance because there is no way for him to erase his material as logged in. But of course I do not really want to communicate in anyway directly with him.
Now back to work - have a new client who I despise but am doing it as favor for one of my best clients. Pays great and task is kinda easy but I so HATE the Client. Will splain when I am ready to submit my bill and am promised pay on delivery of material as in within the hour...but expect them to say check is in the mail
We can discuss via PM - I keep getting offers to edit via PM's but so far that is about it WHEN I ask them Who are you.
Nor is it like I am worried about Matt getting ahold of the material in advance because there is no way for him to erase his material as logged in. But of course I do not really want to communicate in anyway directly with him.
Now back to work - have a new client who I despise but am doing it as favor for one of my best clients. Pays great and task is kinda easy but I so HATE the Client. Will splain when I am ready to submit my bill and am promised pay on delivery of material as in within the hour...but expect them to say check is in the mail
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,828
Anonymous L replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,834
@502,746 (Syntax)
I'm not Matt. I'm just another anon that thinks you're full of shit and a weird stalker
I'm not Matt. I'm just another anon that thinks you're full of shit and a weird stalker
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,840
@502,828 (F)
Nor am I asking for any anon to id themselves. It wood be nice to say Edited by but hey any degree of editing will improve wot I produce so...chans Y I be suspicious? Get any mod to verify you are ok. That is all they need tell me via PM or in open here - Hold on
http://www.scatchan.net/topic/37484
That is me OP and you can PM me there - I am putting nose to grind stone so as to get MS out of my work life ASAP - If you have a email addy you want to share in PM please do so OR create a throwaway one for me - Me? I will use one of a couple of long term email accounts to hand over the stuff for you to edit.
Now be forewarned - Its a small pile of stuff which can be edited down to very little - And of course the full raw truth supplied along with Context - So you will have about 10 mins or more of reading to do in full to get the context.
By say Thur PM I can pack stuff in box n email it to you
Nor am I asking for any anon to id themselves. It wood be nice to say Edited by but hey any degree of editing will improve wot I produce so...chans Y I be suspicious? Get any mod to verify you are ok. That is all they need tell me via PM or in open here - Hold on
http://www.scatchan.net/topic/37484
That is me OP and you can PM me there - I am putting nose to grind stone so as to get MS out of my work life ASAP - If you have a email addy you want to share in PM please do so OR create a throwaway one for me - Me? I will use one of a couple of long term email accounts to hand over the stuff for you to edit.
Now be forewarned - Its a small pile of stuff which can be edited down to very little - And of course the full raw truth supplied along with Context - So you will have about 10 mins or more of reading to do in full to get the context.
By say Thur PM I can pack stuff in box n email it to you
Syntax (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,841
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,860
@previous (Syntax)
That's nice. How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
That's nice. How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,883
@previous (G)
Easy so easy. Just start reading articles about Politics and Technology. AND Make sure you also check out the regional issue of Huffington because well just be sure you do
Easy so easy. Just start reading articles about Politics and Technology. AND Make sure you also check out the regional issue of Huffington because well just be sure you do
Anonymous L replied with this 12 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,890
@502,841 (Syntax)
The ends never justify the means, and you can't break a law to uphold the law. So no. That's bullshit and you know it. Just post a link to any article you fool.
The ends never justify the means, and you can't break a law to uphold the law. So no. That's bullshit and you know it. Just post a link to any article you fool.
Anonymous M replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,891
@502,883 (Syntax)
You expect people to read every single article on Huffington Post, and guess which is yours? lol Post a link to just one of you articles.
You expect people to read every single article on Huffington Post, and guess which is yours? lol Post a link to just one of you articles.
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,894
@502,786 (Syntax)
> It's not stalking or harassment to try and keep the Internet free from crime.
Yes it is stalking and harassment, and you feuding with matt will not keep the internet free from crime.
> It's not stalking or harassment to try and keep the Internet free from crime.
Yes it is stalking and harassment, and you feuding with matt will not keep the internet free from crime.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,897
@502,891 (M)
> You expect people to read every single article on Huffington Post
Of course not ...I expect a few who will look4 me will find me but do NOT EXPECT me to confirm or deny
They even may find it entertaining to check out that Quality site
> You expect people to read every single article on Huffington Post
Of course not ...I expect a few who will look4 me will find me but do NOT EXPECT me to confirm or deny
They even may find it entertaining to check out that Quality site
Syntax (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,898
@502,894 (H)
> Yes it is stalking and harassment, and you feuding with matt will not keep the internet free from crime
Proof?
> Yes it is stalking and harassment, and you feuding with matt will not keep the internet free from crime
Proof?
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,901
@previous (Syntax)> >Yes it is stalking and harassment, and you feuding with matt will not keep the internet free from crime
>
> Proof?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #502,902
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,005
Anonymous L replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,025
@previous (O)
He's afraid to be proven a liar, again.
@502,751 (Syntax)
I'm calling you out to prove a poster eats their own shit on purpose.
He's afraid to be proven a liar, again.
@502,751 (Syntax)
I'm calling you out to prove a poster eats their own shit on purpose.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 41 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,030
@503,005 (O)
LOL er no no. Before I share the why I need to discuss with a Admin on Huff.
@previous (L)
@previous (L)
> He's afraid to be proven a liar, again.
>
>
> I'm calling you out to prove a poster eats their own shit on purpose.
As YOU Should!!! Thank you for the reminder. Too much Work is getting in the way of doing THAT ----> HowSomEver I have put out the word for a quality English Editor of such and now have one on board.
I had many many offers from Unknown sources of unknown quality. Many many offers. Yet the moment I wanted some background on them they RAN for the Hills.
It will be up to the editor to decide if THEY want credit or co-author etc. May even give Editor full decision on the presentation. This may or may not be a pun but frankly
Its not easy to digest
and IF you are up to doing me a favor por favor? remember that last point.
LOL er no no. Before I share the why I need to discuss with a Admin on Huff.
@previous (L)
@previous (L)
> He's afraid to be proven a liar, again.
>
>
> I'm calling you out to prove a poster eats their own shit on purpose.
As YOU Should!!! Thank you for the reminder. Too much Work is getting in the way of doing THAT ----> HowSomEver I have put out the word for a quality English Editor of such and now have one on board.
I had many many offers from Unknown sources of unknown quality. Many many offers. Yet the moment I wanted some background on them they RAN for the Hills.
It will be up to the editor to decide if THEY want credit or co-author etc. May even give Editor full decision on the presentation. This may or may not be a pun but frankly
Its not easy to digest
and IF you are up to doing me a favor por favor? remember that last point.
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,036
@previous (Syntax)
Can you tell us why you need to ask an admin before you're allowed to post your pseudonym?
Can you tell us why you need to ask an admin before you're allowed to post your pseudonym?
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,041
@previous (O)
Oh no no no no no
4Give me for any hint of that Pseudonym EVER becoming pubic cause something I did with it towards the beginning stirred up much 2much problems for Legal at Huff which that Rag as ANY does not need nor were the attorneys of the type to deal with the issue which meant outside council which is terrible expensive! And a US Gov letter followed by phone calls made even more work for the Rag.
Also when I agreed to rite for them I made it clear I need to be Anon BUT BUT Huff does not really allow Anon riters nor more. Of course Pen names have such famous history such as Mark Twain - and Nom de Plume was suggested by a Admin person. The allow part has has - cannot say about has re mail has not been replied2 yet
Oh no no no no no
4Give me for any hint of that Pseudonym EVER becoming pubic cause something I did with it towards the beginning stirred up much 2much problems for Legal at Huff which that Rag as ANY does not need nor were the attorneys of the type to deal with the issue which meant outside council which is terrible expensive! And a US Gov letter followed by phone calls made even more work for the Rag.
Also when I agreed to rite for them I made it clear I need to be Anon BUT BUT Huff does not really allow Anon riters nor more. Of course Pen names have such famous history such as Mark Twain - and Nom de Plume was suggested by a Admin person. The allow part has has - cannot say about has re mail has not been replied2 yet
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,047
@previous (Syntax)
So you can't give us your pseudonym, nor can you give us a reason why you can't give it, nor can you tell us why you can't give a reason.
Why would you make such an outlandish claim if it's impossible to back up?
So you can't give us your pseudonym, nor can you give us a reason why you can't give it, nor can you tell us why you can't give a reason.
Why would you make such an outlandish claim if it's impossible to back up?
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,050
@previous (O)
i actually know the answer to this but i'll need lynns permission to share it. if i get it i'll let you know. it's kind of a thorny issue for him tbqh.
i actually know the answer to this but i'll need lynns permission to share it. if i get it i'll let you know. it's kind of a thorny issue for him tbqh.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,051
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,055
Anonymous O double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,067
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 40 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,071
@503,047 (O)
> So you can't give us your pseudonym, nor can you give us a reason why you can't give it, nor can you tell us why you can't give a reason.
>
> Why would you make such an outlandish claim if it's impossible to back up?
Just wot wood be the point of having a pseudonym if its out in the open. Yes there are a few exceptions but I R never ever going to be one
@503,050 (squeegee)
Perhaps because albeit you and I do not always agree I respect your opinion. Wood need to discuss via PM or via mail
@503,055 (O)
That is just not true. When I post anon and I sure do and someone anyone calls me out on it I fess up. I do see many say it was me but hey they be paranoid. And all no there seem to be several Syntax's
> So you can't give us your pseudonym, nor can you give us a reason why you can't give it, nor can you tell us why you can't give a reason.
>
> Why would you make such an outlandish claim if it's impossible to back up?
Just wot wood be the point of having a pseudonym if its out in the open. Yes there are a few exceptions but I R never ever going to be one
@503,050 (squeegee)
Perhaps because albeit you and I do not always agree I respect your opinion. Wood need to discuss via PM or via mail
@503,055 (O)
That is just not true. When I post anon and I sure do and someone anyone calls me out on it I fess up. I do see many say it was me but hey they be paranoid. And all no there seem to be several Syntax's
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,072
@503,067 (O)
> How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
How about just sayin to self that its a fantasy and forget about it? I mean if you are not already a fan of Huff then does it really matter>
> How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
How about just sayin to self that its a fantasy and forget about it? I mean if you are not already a fan of Huff then does it really matter>
Syntax (OP) triple-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,073
Anonymous K replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,079
@OP
>
> I guess I should have said - Yes all posts (minor exceptions when I reply) Posts go through editors I pay
thats not how it works, you're getting worse at lying
>
> I guess I should have said - Yes all posts (minor exceptions when I reply) Posts go through editors I pay
thats not how it works, you're getting worse at lying
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,196
@503,072 (A)
> > How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
>
> How about just sayin to self that its a fantasy and forget about it? I mean if you are not already a fan of Huff then does it really matter>
So you admit it's a lie.
> > How can we verify that you actually write for Huffington Post, then?
>
> How about just sayin to self that its a fantasy and forget about it? I mean if you are not already a fan of Huff then does it really matter>
So you admit it's a lie.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,220
@previous (O)
I do admit that if you were to bother to look at past and soon to be very present articles it really should not be all that hard to find me under technical - Politics is another matter UNLESS you were to be a fan of nethideaway - the ONE running political forum called Bourbon street. Owner recently said he wants the Billion population of Muslims wiped off of Planet Earth and wants someone to assassinate President Obama (he will deny that charge but will admit to throwing the biggest party of his life the moment someone does)
I have NOT said this b4 except to staff at Huff. I have ritten a large number of articles that now sit in a holding pattern - All Technical and all under the watchful eye of the US Gov SEC.
I was so ready to for instance make fun of a client of mine who I despise - AT&T and do read how their wallets are less full TODAY but it will take 9 Months or 3-5 years to offload the multi millions from AT&T who stole money in mass amounts from customers (really they only shared in the theft) and my Article was locked up by on board lawn.
Currently I have two articles that may only c the lite of day and then only in a blog post on a subject I DARE DARE DARE not hint at - Other then I doubt SEC wood come hard down on me IF IF I used the following word SHORT
And dats all I am about to say cause after all remember what they did to Martha Stewart, and it wood be much worse re longer in slammer for me IF IF I were to exercise my Free Speech rites
Rant over
I do admit that if you were to bother to look at past and soon to be very present articles it really should not be all that hard to find me under technical - Politics is another matter UNLESS you were to be a fan of nethideaway - the ONE running political forum called Bourbon street. Owner recently said he wants the Billion population of Muslims wiped off of Planet Earth and wants someone to assassinate President Obama (he will deny that charge but will admit to throwing the biggest party of his life the moment someone does)
I have NOT said this b4 except to staff at Huff. I have ritten a large number of articles that now sit in a holding pattern - All Technical and all under the watchful eye of the US Gov SEC.
I was so ready to for instance make fun of a client of mine who I despise - AT&T and do read how their wallets are less full TODAY but it will take 9 Months or 3-5 years to offload the multi millions from AT&T who stole money in mass amounts from customers (really they only shared in the theft) and my Article was locked up by on board lawn.
Currently I have two articles that may only c the lite of day and then only in a blog post on a subject I DARE DARE DARE not hint at - Other then I doubt SEC wood come hard down on me IF IF I used the following word SHORT
And dats all I am about to say cause after all remember what they did to Martha Stewart, and it wood be much worse re longer in slammer for me IF IF I were to exercise my Free Speech rites
Rant over
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,221
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,222
@previous (O)Hard to say. Only after the first SEC letter hit Huff did I start to go back to see if I let any inside shit slip in2 text. I admit doing that in chans but not in a way that wood get me arrested.
Currently as I have said - I dare not mention something I really really really NEED to mention and have even PAID an attorney to give me a bit of ok and limits - I so want to help something from going in2 a horrid mess - But I put myself in a rock n hard place by taking on a US Gov assignment for FCC and it fully conflicts only by inference to work I do for a client - WHILE Outsiders are hell bent on total annihilation of something near n dear to my heart.
Shit will bring me to tears n I mean that so now I R with more better reason going to do my daily beach run - I am running out of back up shoes cause last few days of very high tide conflict with very hot temps forcing my runs even b4 surfing my Ocean a Blue
Huff stuff if tied to chan stuff could indeed do real damage - Hey I do have a back up plan on loss of a client and its one hell of a back up plan but it means going back to a great deal of travel again and I think I want to be done with that. Miss so much of that but DO NOT Miss the current difficulties re hours of wasted tyme in lines n security - IF I get to depart from my local small tiny Airport that connects with LAX or SFO - Security on way out is no pain no lines - But coming back is horrid just horrid
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,235
@previous (Syntax)
Hypothetically, let's say someone found your pseudonym. What damage would be done to you if it were made public?
Hypothetically, let's say someone found your pseudonym. What damage would be done to you if it were made public?
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,248
@previous (O)
Its a matter of tyming currently. More damage a lot more damage now then later. AT&T just got in2 huge shit with FCC in unprecedented ways... $105 million dollar fine and its at a tyme when AT&T needs FCC on their side in other matters related to helping them over a hurdle with lots of call drops again. I declined to help them re conflict with another client and those bastards said they wood waive the conflict and I may have fibbed about the other client wood not. (No clue if they wood) Fully admit to helping AT&T with reducing call drops by design Addition which put lots of cash in my wallet and one hell of a lot more re Billion+ in Qualcomm's pocket. No conflict of interest And the reason I just spelled this out here is for a record for the future if need be for a perhaps news worthy in future related short subject
Decoder ring required.
Its a matter of tyming currently. More damage a lot more damage now then later. AT&T just got in2 huge shit with FCC in unprecedented ways... $105 million dollar fine and its at a tyme when AT&T needs FCC on their side in other matters related to helping them over a hurdle with lots of call drops again. I declined to help them re conflict with another client and those bastards said they wood waive the conflict and I may have fibbed about the other client wood not. (No clue if they wood) Fully admit to helping AT&T with reducing call drops by design Addition which put lots of cash in my wallet and one hell of a lot more re Billion+ in Qualcomm's pocket. No conflict of interest And the reason I just spelled this out here is for a record for the future if need be for a perhaps news worthy in future related short subject
Decoder ring required.
Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,262
@previous (Syntax)
Hypothetically, let's say someone found your pseudonym. What damage would be done to you if it were made public?
Hypothetically, let's say someone found your pseudonym. What damage would be done to you if it were made public?
Anonymous O double-posted this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,303
Still waiting for a gibberish-free answer from the supposed HuffPost editor.
Syntax (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #503,306
@previous (O)
ok if i save tyme n copypasta from sc?
Anonymous B (you) — 2 minutes ago, 37 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #258,363
@previous (D)
Excellent
Lets hope they honor the Nom de Plume they provided me. That said as everyone no's mistrakes are made. I have never had a reason to visit the headquarters of Huff. I get invites to local events in LA or San Francisco but like its always conflicting with more better events for me. I am also pissed at The Boss never met her never talked to her on phone but have lots of text via multi means. Pissed at her only recently.
Betting if you ask them with my Nom de Plume, they may confirm I do rite for them.
Ya all making wayyyyyyy to big a deal out of this.
ok if i save tyme n copypasta from sc?
Anonymous B (you) — 2 minutes ago, 37 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #258,363
@previous (D)
Excellent
Lets hope they honor the Nom de Plume they provided me. That said as everyone no's mistrakes are made. I have never had a reason to visit the headquarters of Huff. I get invites to local events in LA or San Francisco but like its always conflicting with more better events for me. I am also pissed at The Boss never met her never talked to her on phone but have lots of text via multi means. Pissed at her only recently.
Betting if you ask them with my Nom de Plume, they may confirm I do rite for them.
Ya all making wayyyyyyy to big a deal out of this.