Topic: Should Minichan have ban voting?

Dw !jdTkvovFCQ started this discussion 12 years ago #36,769

¿¿¿¿

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #498,784

yes

squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,786

i vote to ban the entire orient. someone second please.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 36 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,802

@previous (squeegee)
Seconded

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,807

point of order: a motion has been seconded. lets bring this to a vote. all in favor of banning asia say "aye."

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 24 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,808

Aye

(Edited 7 seconds later.)

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 27 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,809

aye

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 22 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,810

"aye."

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,814

nay

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #498,815

i'm calling that a quorum. the ayes have it, motion carries. r04r, you know what to do. right? becuase i don't. i can't find the ban country by ip thing.

(Edited 53 seconds later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,816

Aye.

Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,817

@498,815 (squeegee)
Motion dismissed.

r04r joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,818

@498,815 (squeegee)
Not happening, literally every user (except the bare minimum required to vote) would eventually wind up banned.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,819

@previous (r04r)
what if we just make ban voting apply to matt? then we could do it.

squeegee double-posted this 12 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,820

i motion to make ban voting apply only to matt. someone second please.

Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,822

@498,818 (r04r)
lel

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,830

@498,819 (squeegee)
@498,820 (squeegee)
Why Matt? He's harmless. Ban the hindushit instead.

Dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,831

@498,818 (r04r)
Maybe just referendums?

Dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,832

@498,830 (H)
sup matt

Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #498,833

@previous (Dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
looking good, matt