Topic: An argument for Nobility rule and the elimination of the retarded swathes of homogenized undermen
Dr. started this discussion 12 years ago #36,023
Richard Lynn in his 2006 book Race Differences in Intelligence reviewed the literature on worldwide IQ testing and calculated the average IQs for different races, here is a sampling:Bushmen:
In Southwest Africa 54.
Sub-Saharan Africans:
In Africa 67.
Aborigines:
In Australia 62.
Pacific Islander:
In Pacific Islands 85.
Native Americans.
In North America 86
Southeast Asians:
In Southeast Asia 87.
Arctic People:
In North America 91.
Europeans:
In Europe 99. Outside Europe 99.
The oldest African (free from the Neanderthal genes, who started the Europeans from all I can tell) being the San or Bushman, and a more generic term for those in their area being the Sub Saharan Africans, have the lowest scores by far. Though all of Africa has an IQ of around 70. . . the cut off of mental retardation for the rest of the world. This is seen in the schools of Detroit, dominated by the relatively pure sub saharan blacks. Check out this news report stating that the kids are getting scores as if they were guessing! Showing the sad state of the education system, and the reason why whites are leaving in droves to home school. And there is another one saying how lower IQ shows up in lower morals too. No shocker for those who have been exposed to black neighbourhoods.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dBbZFXr05U&feature=share
http://www.sullivan-county.com/id5/behavior.htm
There is no doubt, knowing the DNA of some of African tribes the average IQ of even Africa being 70 is brought up by the ancient mixing in Africa, and all blacks that are unmixed may have as low as 54 even in America. (Maybe environment helps some though.)
On the other hand, the purest Europeans have been tested to have an average of 115. The royals and presidents of their pure bloodline average around 135! Those said to have "the divine right to rule", all being from the royal bloodlines of Europe, are the smartest in the world!
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #493,009
Success at IQ tests relies on being well-educated and well-nourished and poor people tend to be less well-educated
Shock and horror, people who live in the fucking desert hunting bok tend to be less well-educated than and don't eat as well as the royal family
Shock and horror, people who live in the fucking desert hunting bok tend to be less well-educated than and don't eat as well as the royal family
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,011
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,012
@493,009 (B)
High IQ people will have more cognitive resources to avoid bad dietary habits; education on these matters is lacking publicly in any case and so will depend entirely on your ability to assimilate information independently. Even macronutrient deficiencies don't affect IQ by that much; even accounting for a decline by iodine-deficient cretinism for example, on the same distributuion an IQ 90 White trash celtonig will still eat at McDonalds every day and an IQ 130 Aryan will still drink wheatgrass preceding their daily jog.
You're an idiot who confuses correlation for causation and can't establish the correct direction of causal effect.
High IQ people will have more cognitive resources to avoid bad dietary habits; education on these matters is lacking publicly in any case and so will depend entirely on your ability to assimilate information independently. Even macronutrient deficiencies don't affect IQ by that much; even accounting for a decline by iodine-deficient cretinism for example, on the same distributuion an IQ 90 White trash celtonig will still eat at McDonalds every day and an IQ 130 Aryan will still drink wheatgrass preceding their daily jog.
You're an idiot who confuses correlation for causation and can't establish the correct direction of causal effect.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,017
@previous (Dr.)
Now now, I've already shown you the IQ results of the test you made me take. I am painfully above average. Not special :(
Now now, I've already shown you the IQ results of the test you made me take. I am painfully above average. Not special :(
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,030
i would like to see the results of OP's intelligence test seeing as how he can't spell and thinks formulating an "argument" is just re-posting a couple of youtube links and paraphrasing an undisclosed source which is nothing more than unrelated second hand information gathered with zero consistency.
OP is a flipping moron, and i bet you $5 that he cannot fathom why he is a moron so he thinks of himself as superior despite doing and saying inferior things.
If you want to make your race look smart, OP, start with proper research, source disclosure, and data gathering. otherwise you just look like a loud mouthed twit.
OP is a flipping moron, and i bet you $5 that he cannot fathom why he is a moron so he thinks of himself as superior despite doing and saying inferior things.
If you want to make your race look smart, OP, start with proper research, source disclosure, and data gathering. otherwise you just look like a loud mouthed twit.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,038
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,044
IQ test are somewhat suspect. I consistently score a below average yet I have just taken 8 "O" levels, of which I am expected to score highly in 6 (A's)and pass the remaining 2 with ease. This, following a year+ off school.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,056
@493,030 (squeegee)
You're a liberal negroid. You're not meant to believe in inferiority and superiority and as such have conceded to the veracity of the debate by arguing in its terms. Idiot!
You're a liberal negroid. You're not meant to believe in inferiority and superiority and as such have conceded to the veracity of the debate by arguing in its terms. Idiot!
Dr. (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,059
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,065
@493,056 (Dr.)
no, i believe in inferiority. i don't think you're imaginary, after all. i just don't think you are superior in any way is all.
you are the definition of inferiority.
no, i believe in inferiority. i don't think you're imaginary, after all. i just don't think you are superior in any way is all.
you are the definition of inferiority.
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,066
@previous (squeegee)
Bringing out your moderation badge like some aggressive African tribesman elder as an intimidation bid doesn't work on the truly superior. Thanks.
Bringing out your moderation badge like some aggressive African tribesman elder as an intimidation bid doesn't work on the truly superior. Thanks.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,072
squeegee double-posted this 12 years ago, 13 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,073
better?
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,078
@493,072 (squeegee)
Only the mind-blind African would think he could accurately gauge White sensitivities enough to mock them in caricature. Such an arrogant race.
Only the mind-blind African would think he could accurately gauge White sensitivities enough to mock them in caricature. Such an arrogant race.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,104
FYI This isn't an actual argument. An argument has premises and a conclusion. A good argument has true premises with a conclusion that follows logically from the premises. You have a jumbled mess of propositions that are only loosely tied together. Even if it were possible to turn your collection of "facts" (using the term in the loosest possible sense) into an argument, it would be a shit argument.
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,108
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Even if it were possible to turn your collection of "facts" (using the term in the loosest possible sense) into an argument, it would be a shit argument.
Oh but it's very possibly, just not to an under-evolved Aboriginal as yourself. As a lowly negroid, you haven't the ability to discern the argument's structure from its seemingly disjointed presentation because you lack the capacity to see things before they happen. As a worthless desert-monkey, you need each proposition laid out sequentially for you due to this lack of laterality; you need it drilled into you as if your skulls were drums to be beaten on by the White man.
The deliberately disparate style of argumentation was a test to see if your inferior mind could cogently deduce anything conclusive from its underlying logic. You have displayed instead that your overwhelming anger overrides any sense of rationality, spurring you to spew by rote sophistical gospel on the Jewish neo-Grecean syllogistic idiocy that ties you to this Asiatic tunnel-vision monkey-reasoning which you had been imparted, as a defence mechanism to conceal the underlying insecurity you possess in knowing full well that your inferior race has been exposed for its retardation in the process of genuine scientific inquiry that typically is unbeholden to these limitations in methodological process, which had motivated you to uphold the egalitarian lie in the first place.
> Even if it were possible to turn your collection of "facts" (using the term in the loosest possible sense) into an argument, it would be a shit argument.
Oh but it's very possibly, just not to an under-evolved Aboriginal as yourself. As a lowly negroid, you haven't the ability to discern the argument's structure from its seemingly disjointed presentation because you lack the capacity to see things before they happen. As a worthless desert-monkey, you need each proposition laid out sequentially for you due to this lack of laterality; you need it drilled into you as if your skulls were drums to be beaten on by the White man.
The deliberately disparate style of argumentation was a test to see if your inferior mind could cogently deduce anything conclusive from its underlying logic. You have displayed instead that your overwhelming anger overrides any sense of rationality, spurring you to spew by rote sophistical gospel on the Jewish neo-Grecean syllogistic idiocy that ties you to this Asiatic tunnel-vision monkey-reasoning which you had been imparted, as a defence mechanism to conceal the underlying insecurity you possess in knowing full well that your inferior race has been exposed for its retardation in the process of genuine scientific inquiry that typically is unbeholden to these limitations in methodological process, which had motivated you to uphold the egalitarian lie in the first place.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,109
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,118
@493,108 (Dr.)
If there were underlying logic, we would be having a different conversation. Here is the most charitable argument I can construct from the verbose nonsense in the first post.
1. Africans have lower IQs than Europeans.
2. If Africans have lower IQs than Europeans, then Europeans should rule in a monarchical fashion over Africans.
3. Therefore Europeans should rule in a monarchical over Africans.
The main problem is you spent your entire post poorly defending premise 1 without stating or defending premise 2, the premise on which your argument hinges. If you tried to hand this in as Phil 101 homework you would get an F. The argument isn't "hidden" it's just bad, if it even exists at all.
If there were underlying logic, we would be having a different conversation. Here is the most charitable argument I can construct from the verbose nonsense in the first post.
1. Africans have lower IQs than Europeans.
2. If Africans have lower IQs than Europeans, then Europeans should rule in a monarchical fashion over Africans.
3. Therefore Europeans should rule in a monarchical over Africans.
The main problem is you spent your entire post poorly defending premise 1 without stating or defending premise 2, the premise on which your argument hinges. If you tried to hand this in as Phil 101 homework you would get an F. The argument isn't "hidden" it's just bad, if it even exists at all.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,120
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Nice strawman, retard. Fuck off back to Zimbabwe to impress your low-IQ Philosophy 101 lecturers with more esoteric, pretentious Nubian drivel.
Nice strawman, retard. Fuck off back to Zimbabwe to impress your low-IQ Philosophy 101 lecturers with more esoteric, pretentious Nubian drivel.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 12 years ago, 52 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,121
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,126
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 14 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,127
@493,120 (Dr.)
illegible gibberish. you also misspelled a lot of words.
:/
i believe fake anon, he sounds educated. you sound... desperate.
illegible gibberish. you also misspelled a lot of words.
:/
i believe fake anon, he sounds educated. you sound... desperate.
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,131
@previous (squeegee)
Of course to someone of similar genetic stature the most aggressive, loudmouthed idiot of the tribe will sound the most convincing.
Of course to someone of similar genetic stature the most aggressive, loudmouthed idiot of the tribe will sound the most convincing.
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,134
@previous (Dr.)
what makes you say that? you don't sound convincing at all for a loud mouthed idiot.
what makes you say that? you don't sound convincing at all for a loud mouthed idiot.
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 30 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,135
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,137
@previous (Dr.)
that's not an actual thing. you certainly make up a lot of stuff. why not just educate yourself in real things instead of making up fake concepts all the time?
that's not an actual thing. you certainly make up a lot of stuff. why not just educate yourself in real things instead of making up fake concepts all the time?
Dr. (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #493,138
@previous (squeegee)
EMPIRICISM IS PERCEPTION DECEPTION DESIGNED TO BRAINWASH THE ARYAN INTO A HOMOGENIZED, PROLETARIAN NEGRITUDINAL-EMULATORY LUMPENPROLE SERFDOM PEON.
EMPIRICISM IS PERCEPTION DECEPTION DESIGNED TO BRAINWASH THE ARYAN INTO A HOMOGENIZED, PROLETARIAN NEGRITUDINAL-EMULATORY LUMPENPROLE SERFDOM PEON.