Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#487,958
ozone alert days.
welcome to future weather.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 35 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#487,960
OP
Good info for those who are allergic from certain kinds of pollens - Just means a good day to stay indoors OR go out with a mask on - and dump all clothes in bag b4 coming in house and pollinating all of house so they end up with allergies for many days after. Not done so much on West coast.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,986
Im allergic to pollen, and get massive migraines when things are particularly polleny.
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,987
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
So when you see a high pollen alert on weather.com, will you just... not go outside?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,990
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
No, I take an allergy pill, and I'm fine.
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 53 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,991
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Do you consider this a valid weather alert?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,992
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
I mean sure, maybe it has some gardening use as well.
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,993
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Don't you think it would be better for these people to use a separate pollen forecast or gardening forecast section? Instead of FUCKING EVERYONE getting an exclamation point notice that you have to click on just to find out it's just... fucking... pollen?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#487,997
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
That's a fair point. But I mean how much of a nuisance is the notification.And really is it any more or less important than "it's gonna be cloudy" barring storms and such, how important is the weather to most people?
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,000
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Well it goes in the section where there are watches and warnings for floods, thunderstorms, and tornadoes. So I think it's a public safety issue, really.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,001
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
I have a hard time seeing pollen as a public safety thing. I mean maybe some people are so allergic pollen would kill them or something. Or bees! People have bee allergies, and bees are all over pollen.
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,003
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Yes, I mean it's like a false positive, so people will not be as concerned by actual weather alerts. Actually, most tornado warnings are false positives too, which you'll sometimes hear blamed as the reason sometimes people just ignore real tornado warnings and then die.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,008
@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
Okay, but who would really end up dead because they ignored the pollen warning?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,009
@488,003 (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
Okay, but who would really end up dead because they ignored the pollen warning?
cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,010
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 17 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,093
@488,008 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Derp. Missing the point so hard. Mixing pointless warnings with actual severe warnings is dangerous, because pollen alert is pretty common, but a fucking flood is not. People will be trained to ignore the warnings, because each time they click it, oh hey it's pollen. Then that one time they don't click it it's something actually dangerous.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#488,095
Going to add this here - Weather reports and me being clueless as I was with my first pollen report on TV
On my first biz trip to Boston Mass. Perhaps 28 or so and I am So Cal born n bread - It was around October. One week trip with two weekends to self - Weather report at end has a
PEAK report. Named locations like New Hampshire and kept saying PEAK. I had no clue at end wot they were talking about. Asked at front desk and learned so much so quickly - Traveled to New Hampshire and of course on way viewed amazing part of USA I had no clue to - Called my wife and said pack for next weekend as its a surprise so don't ask - I took two added days off n ditched work and we hiked a bit of the Appalachian trail in New Hampshire.
Weather reports can be truly life changing but where I live weather 95% of tyme is same o same o
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#488,116
@488,093 (F)
Thats the point I was trying to make. That it doesnt make sense for pollen to be on a list of warnings that include floods and tornados.
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#488,118
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Right, which is what the other person was arguing too.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 12 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#488,119
@previous (F)
I know, I was convinced of their position. I was defeated.
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#488,121
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#488,122
@488,118 (F)
If you were in charge ...you wood be angry at So Cal weather reports that include Surfing reports and tyme of low n high tide and RIP TIDE warnings (Cities with beaches such as San Francisco Los Angeles San Diego etc
Good thing u not be in charge - Me pulled back from my daily beach run re dumb client thing setting off my pager - me MAD as fuck