Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: New CDC Study shows 48% of black women have herpes!!

Titicaca started this discussion 12 years ago #35,461

That is a disgusting fact and needs to be taught in our schools. These women are not only the fattest and poorest but they are also the grossest.

http://www.yourblackworld.net/2012/08/uncategorized/cdc-nearly-half-of-all-black-women-have-genital-herpes/

(Edited 33 seconds later.)

stella joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #487,719

cool

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 30 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #487,720

I am sorry, but we already have a ShitArse. There simply isn't a vacancy for you here, with that routine.

Maybe you could do a rabid Libertarian act? We haven't had one of those for a while. And the last guy who did it was a real big hit.

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

Titicaca (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #487,722

That's a fact lettuce dude!! It's not racist it's a simple fact. Do you like herpes or maybe have herpes and that's why this struck a cord with your diseased ass?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,730

http://youtu.be/fvj9evAeCXk?t=3m34s

dw skg llc joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,733

Kill yourself

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 51 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,739

And what's the percentage for whites? Also, please realize percentages are hardly ever done accurately.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,747

DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE PEOPLE. I HAPPEN TO LIVE IN ATLANTA AND I REMEMBER WHEN THEY WERE PLAYING THIS COMMERCIAL ON THE RADIO LAST YEAR. I ALMOST CHOCKED ON WHAT I WAS EATING BECAUSE I HAPPEN TO BE SITTING AROUND A TABLE OF MY CLOESET FRIENDS WHO ARE ALL AFRICAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL FEMALES WHO, BY THE WAY, ARE MAJORITY MARRIED BUT ALL OF US ARE DISEASE FREE. I FOUND IT QUITE DISTRUBING THAT THEY KEPT PLAYING THAT INSULTING COMMERCIAL 10 TIMES A DAY SO I CALLED THE CDC ON TO THE CARPET TO EXPLAIN AND GIVE PROOF OF THESE SO CALLED STATISICIS. I CAN TELL YOU THAT THEY GIVE ME THE RUN AROUND, KEPT TRANSFERING ME TO DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS, AND KEPT ME ON A HOLD FOR OVER AN HOUR. FINALLY THEY GIVE ME A NUMBER TO ANOTHER COMPANY WHO DOES THEIR STATISTICS AND I KNOW RIGHT THEN AND THERE THAT THEY WERE SPREADING A BUNCH OF HALF TRUTHS. AFTER A COUPLE OF HOURS FINALLY I GOT DOWN TO THE ROOT OF THE SITUATION AND IT TURNED OUT THAT IT WAS A BLIND STUDY THAT THEY DID IN THIS SMALL RURAL TOWN IN COLORADO AND THATS HOW THEY CAME UP WITH THESE LIES SAYING THAT HALF OF THE POPULATION OF BLACK WOMEN HAVE HERPES. BLACK PEOPLE, LET THIS BE A LESSON, WE HAVE TO STAND UP TO THOSE WHO WANT TO SPREAD LIES AND DEGRADE OUR RACE….ESPECIALLY OUR WOMEN. WE SHOULD ALL HOLD THE CDC ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE INFORMATION THAT THEY PUT OUT AS “TRUTH”.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,750

@previous (G)

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU HERPES INFECTED NIGGER

Greene joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,753

Wasn't it called harpies?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,755

@OP @487,750 (H)

butthurt jelly and arg

cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,803

@487,720 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)

> Maybe you could do a rabid Libertarian act? We haven't had one of those for a while. And the last guy who did it was a real big hit.

Meta is still here though!

Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,806

@previous (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
I wouldn't describe myself as "rabid". I am reasonable and polite, at least by BBS standards. Thanks.

cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,807

@previous (Metæ)
Okay. Thanks.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #487,827

@487,803 (cccuuunnttt !CUuNTTZV9M)
I said rabid, m8.

Justin Igger joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,963

Facts just the facts.

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,972

Whats sad is that the two types of residents that I see with genital warts most frequently are black women and white men. The men have them on their penises, and the women, their anuses.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,978

Blame poor access to reproductive healthcare, which is deliberately caused by the GOP as a direct attack on FAAB people of all genders, especially poor and/or Black. This is purely the result of systemic violence.

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,984

@previous (O)
What/whom is a "FAAB"?

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,985

@previous (Metæ)
Its a special snowflake term that means female assigned at birth.

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,988

@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
So, it means people who were female at birth but who don't necessarily identify as such today (ie women born women)? So a transman and a cis woman would both be "FAAB"?

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #491,990

@previous (Metæ)
Yes

Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,000

@491,985 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
"Special snowflake"? There... needs to be a term for that.
@491,988 (Metæ)
Yep! Means that the doctor took a look at their crotch when they were born and wrote down an "F", regardless of what the person's gender ended up being. (Yes, this does include cis women!)

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,002

Studies show 100% of the niggers drink, drank or will drink water at some point in their lifes!

@491,978 (O)
> FAAB

Fucked Anus After Birth

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,004

@492,000 (O)
Birth certificates record sex, not gender. Sex is usually, though not always (Fausto-Sterling's herms, merms and ferms springs to mind) pretty easily determined by genitalia.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,006

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Thank you for saying this.

Anonymous O replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,008

@492,004 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I will ask again: what the fuck is sex? Is it genital shape? Is it gonads? Is it secondary sexual characteristics? Is it chromosomes? Is it hormone concentrations? Is it two of these, or three of these, or four of these?

What about androgen insensitivity? What about Kleinfelter? What about Turner? What about cis people of both binary genders with abnormal hormone levels? What about cis people whose genitals or gonads have been removed, disabled, or altered? What about trans people who've had genital reconstruction surgery? What about intersex people? What about people with extremely small genitalia? What about people with underdeveloped secondary characteristics? "Sex" is worse than useless in all of these cases.

"Sex" is an infinitely useless term, only of use to transphobia and... oh, right, transphobia. That's literally the whole fucking point in the concept of "sex" as a single, monolithic thing that "exists". Sex doesn't exist. It's an inference from extant, physical things, which is made purely for the purpose of weird essentialist justifications for misogyny, transphobia, and many other sorts of bigotry. It could be utterly eliminated without causing any problems -- we have terms to describe all the things that it's intended to imply.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Killer Lettuce !L.Xnbz68Q6 replied with this 12 years ago, 2 days later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,712

@previous (O)

> I will ask again: what the fuck is sex? Is it genital shape? Is it gonads? Is it secondary sexual characteristics? Is it chromosomes? Is it hormone concentrations? Is it two of these, or three of these, or four of these?
>
> What about androgen insensitivity? What about Kleinfelter? What about Turner? What about cis people of both binary genders with abnormal hormone levels? What about cis people whose genitals or gonads have been removed, disabled, or altered? What about trans people who've had genital reconstruction surgery? What about intersex people? What about people with extremely small genitalia? What about people with underdeveloped secondary characteristics? "Sex" is worse than useless in all of these cases.
>
> "Sex" is an infinitely useless term, only of use to transphobia and... oh, right, transphobia. That's literally the whole fucking point in the concept of "sex" as a single, monolithic thing that "exists". Sex doesn't exist. It's an inference from extant, physical things, which is made purely for the purpose of weird essentialist justifications for misogyny, transphobia, and many other sorts of bigotry. It could be utterly eliminated without causing any problems -- we have terms to describe all the things that it's intended to imply.

You need to get laid.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,721

@492,008 (O)

> I will ask again: what the fuck is sex? Is it genital shape? Is it gonads? Is it secondary sexual characteristics? Is it chromosomes? Is it hormone concentrations? Is it two of these, or three of these, or four of these?
>
> What about androgen insensitivity? What about Kleinfelter? What about Turner? What about cis people of both binary genders with abnormal hormone levels? What about cis people whose genitals or gonads have been removed, disabled, or altered? What about trans people who've had genital reconstruction surgery? What about intersex people? What about people with extremely small genitalia? What about people with underdeveloped secondary characteristics? "Sex" is worse than useless in all of these cases.
>
> "Sex" is an infinitely useless term, only of use to transphobia and... oh, right, transphobia. That's literally the whole fucking point in the concept of "sex" as a single, monolithic thing that "exists". Sex doesn't exist. It's an inference from extant, physical things, which is made purely for the purpose of weird essentialist justifications for misogyny, transphobia, and many other sorts of bigotry. It could be utterly eliminated without causing any problems -- we have terms to describe all the things that it's intended to imply.

Sleep it off, honey.

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,777

@491,972 (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
How do the men with genital warts on their penii feel about being collateral damage in the GOP attack on FAAB people of all genders?

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,789

@previous (Metæ)
Okay im now actively Ignoring you.

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,790

@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
I'm sorry, I was making a joke about what Joe DDM said :( It wasnt meant to cause offence.

swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/ replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,805

@previous (Metæ)
Youre okay

Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,837

@previous (swamplights !!0lQNsDoq/)
Ah okay, I just thought when you said "Im actively ignoring you" you were mad.

Thank god, too, for I was about to make a "Kook, if Ive done anything wrong to offend you" thread.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #492,839

@previous (Metæ)
Oh stop! lol you're horrible!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.