Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Is affirmative actions racist?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #3,543

Is giving select races an advantage at schools and workplaces racist?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes. 9 90%
No. 1 10%

The Owl !yshAAUvyds joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #64,208

It is positive discrimination, which is trying to counter negative discrimination. At the end of the day though, all you get with that is double the discrimination.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,209

It is, because it's saying that those certain races can't get ahead on their own.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,214

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
Yes. NIGGERS,spics, and chinks can do it on their own.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,219

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
Don't be like that.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,245

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

> Don't be like that.
I said what you said. The message is the same. Words are not weapons.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,250

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
How is that the same? I also don't believe in hate crime legislation.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,263

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
You are against it because it excludes the abilities of a person based on race. I said that niggers, spics, and chinks can do it on their own.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,268

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
It does exclude the abilities of a person based on race, so that makes it racist.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,278

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
Yes! That is what I said an I agree with you.

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,279

Yes... it's another example of political correctness gone mad.

There was a big fuss in New Zealand recently about black people been allowed into university regardless of their grades. I'm glad it was shot down.

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,281

@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)

> political correctness gone mad

I swear to fuck, the next person to say that to me gets an earlobe full of fist.

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,283

Somebody please say it.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,287

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD!!!!!!!!!!

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,289

@64,278 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
Than why use those racial slurs?

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,295

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
Because the constitution. Also they are words. Nobody should ever feel inhibited to exercise their right to free speech.

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,297

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)

Not even to be polite?

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,312

@previous (The Owl !yshAAUvyds)
Well that falls on the person's personal choice.

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,317

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)

It's also my personal choice to think that someone should be disregarded for being rude.

Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,326

@previous (The Owl !yshAAUvyds)
Yes. The world is full of personal choices.

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,329

@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)

And what a wonderful and sexy world it is.

The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #64,331

@previous (The Owl !yshAAUvyds)
I'd hit it.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.