Topic: On a scale of 1 to 10. How retarded am I?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 12 years ago #35,020

my $retard;

$retard = param('Scale');

if ($retard <= "5") {
print "Pretty retarded and autistic.";
}
elsif ($retard >= "6") {
print "Not really retarded or autistic.";
}
elsif ($retard >= "11") {
print "Not an option, please select a number between 1 and 10.";
}
elsif ($retard == "0") {
print "Not an option, please select a number between 1 and 10.";
}

Poll option	Votes	Percentage
1 (pretty retarded)	7	64%
2	-	0%
3	2	18%
4	-	0%
5	-	0%
6	-	0%
7	-	0%
8	1	9%
9	1	9%
10 (not retarded)	-	0%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #482,053

> Consider all values less than or equal to five.
> Consider all values greater than or equal to six.
> Pretend to consider values bigger than eleven even though eleven is greater than six and I have already accounted for those values in a previous test and this is unreachable code.
> Pretend to give a shit about zero even though a value of zero is less than five and I have already accounted for it in a previous test and this is unreachable code.

How retarded you are: 5.14132654

EDIT: Sorry. I downgraded the retardedness as I think this might be a joke post.

(Edited 8 minutes later.)

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,054

@previous (B)
So, a bit less than half retarded.

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,055

@previous (C)
I was hoping for a different response, but okay. I don't think Cathy is actually retarded.

Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,056

@previous (B)
I just had to point it out; the retard scale Cathy drew up is literally... retarded.

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,057

@previous (C)
Good point! On the retard scale, I would give this post a 5.71823.

Bobby2Sox !!ztPBX/o0I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,058

I'm in there somewhere in R/L but I get by.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,061

-10

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 51 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,066

Why not just have it say (in whatever nerd language you're doing)
If retard >=1 and <=5 print "pretty retarded and autistic."
Elsif retard >5 and <=10 print "Not really retarded and autistic"
Else print "Enter a number between one and ten or I will fuck your dad"

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 51 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,074

you're pretty fucking retarded, hth

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,079

@482,066 (F)
because retardation

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 50 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,084

What's with this random code? That didn't need to be there. You are retarded...

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,088

@OP

that should be a case statement

Elim joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,095

Lmfao i voted '8' because a not-retarded person's poll would have been least to most retarded. You're pretty retarded

Elim double-posted this 12 years ago, 54 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,097

So 3

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,165

@482,066 (F)
But then you would be able to enter 0 and 11+.
This is Perl by the way.

Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,168

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
...no. no you could not.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,177

@previous (H)
Don't you have to tell the script not to run the code after a certain number though?
If you enter 6 or 10 or even 12 into the textbox and you're only allowed to enter 1-10.
How does the computer know to stop at 10 without that line?

Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,179

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
uhh what lets look at this step by step

If retard >=1 and <=5 print "pretty retarded and autistic." # IF THE NUMBER IS EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN 1 OR EQUAL TO OR LOWER THAN 5, DO SHIT. NUMBERS: 1,2,3,4,5
Elsif retard >5 and <=10 print "Not really retarded and autistic" # IF THE NUMBER IS GREATER THAN 5 OR EQUAL TO OR LOWER THAN 10, DO SHIT. NUMBERS: 6,7,8,9,10
Else print "Enter a number between one and ten or I will fuck your dad" # IF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS DID NOT MATCH, DO SHIT. NUMBERS: -1, 12, 99 bitches and aint got no problem

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,180

@previous (H)
Oh, I see it now, I missed the "<= 10" part.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,183

Let me rephrase my original statement.

my $retard;

$retard = param('Scale');

if ($retard >= 1 and <= 5) {
print "Majorly retarded and autistic.";
}
elsif ($retard > 5 and <= 10) {
print "Not really retarded or autistic in the slightest.";
}
else {
print "0 and 11+ are not options!";
}

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #482,184

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
http://perldoc.perl.org/5.8.8/Switch.html

Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,293

Lets see: take a look at the threads you post, take a look at the life you're living, you consistently blame your bad life based on the town you live in but yet even though -I- lived in (probably) a much smaller town, was able to get my life in order.

You obviously have autism (minecraft threads, threads about what you had for lunch, etc)

this thread

So you are retarded.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

The Captain !PundosRBSM joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,294

@previous (G)

You're just upset because you don't understand the programming language.

Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,296

@previous (The Captain !PundosRBSM)

> You're just upset because you don't understand the programming language.

Whatever you say you roleplaying autist

The Captain !PundosRBSM replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,299

@previous (G)

I don't roleplay, actually.

Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,301

@previous (The Captain !PundosRBSM)

> I don't roleplay, actually.

see @482,296 (G)

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,342

@482,293 (G)
How can you leave out that I often blame myself a lot for my life?
Maybe even a little bit more excessively.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,350

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,353

@previous (N)
0 and 11+ are not options!

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #482,359

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
So -2 is cool?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,365

@previous (B)
Nope, must be a number between 1 and 10.
See @482,183 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,366

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Well, that code does rule out -2 as an answer, but I have to take issue with your reply, "0 and 11+ are not options!" See, -2 is not in the set of integers (I'm assuming now that the response must be an integer, although this is hardly stated in your posts) included in "0 and 11+" -2 is neither equal to 0 nor is it eleven or greater than eleven, so I thought it might be okay...

A simple "Your're response must be between 1 and 10!" would have been fine. A "Your're response must be between 1 and 10 (inclusive)" would have been great. A "Your're response must range from 1 to 10!" would be awesome.

(Edited 9 minutes later.)

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,369

quite

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,393

@482,366 (B)
Fine, let me rephrase for the third time.

my $retard;

$retard = param('Scale');

if ($retard >= 1 or $retard <= 5) {
print "You are retarded and/or autistic.";
}
elsif ($retard > 5 or $retard <= 10) {
print "You are not retarded and/or autistic.";
}
else {
print "Your response must range from 1 to 10!";
}

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,396

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
That's pretty sexy. As much as I was hoping that you would try to put it into a switch statement (as numerous anons have urged), that code has a quiet simplicity to it. I like it. (Some small part of me wants to rewrite it with only four "less than" tests to optimize the instructions used, but I guess an optimizing compiler probably takes care of that sort of thing nowadays.)

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,399

OPs retardation transcends numbers

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,402

@482,396 (B)
> optimizing compiler
Oh wait. Perl... and this is a thing that is getting called once in a while when someone responds...

Yeah, the code looks okay from here Cath!

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,403

@previous (B)
This isn't any serious code. It was just me being dumb and using Perl as a written language.

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #482,404

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Yeah, I get it. It's probably a good sign that you practice "thinking in code" like this. Rock on Cathy!

Minichan