Topic: #YesAllWomen have the right to genital integrity, but men do not.
Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago #35,000
Discuss.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later[^] [v] #481,722
the obsession is strong with this one
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,726
this thread is dumb
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,728
Third-wave feminism is a sham and gives the first two waves a bad name.
Probably because the first two had something to fight against.
Probably because the first two had something to fight against.
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,730
Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,740
OP
I agree with you. ''Other then a mass of Muslim Woman are not not not born with genital integrity.
Muslim mothers will demand the chopping off of daughters genitals.
Christian and Jewish Mothers often make a mess of male baby genitals.
I agree with you. ''Other then a mass of Muslim Woman are not not not born with genital integrity.
Muslim mothers will demand the chopping off of daughters genitals.
Christian and Jewish Mothers often make a mess of male baby genitals.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,753
@previous (Syntax)
And they are all ridiculous. Especially the Christians, for the Bible specifically commands them NOT to do it. And yet they still do it, because they are ignorant of their own faith.
And they are all ridiculous. Especially the Christians, for the Bible specifically commands them NOT to do it. And yet they still do it, because they are ignorant of their own faith.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,785
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,786
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,788
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 9 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,837
@481,785 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
@481,786 (H)
@previous (I)
The Bible doesn't exactly forbid it, it just says that it really ought not to be done, that it is completely unnecessary and meaningless to continue it for "religious reasons".
"Watch out for those dogs, those evildoers, those mutilators of the flesh. For it is we who are the circumcision, we who serve God by his Spirit, who boast in Christ Jesus, and who put no confidence in the flesh" - Philippians 3:2-3:3
"Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts." - 1 Corinthians 7:19
"In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ" - Colossians 2:11
"What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision?" - Romans 3:1
"Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision." - 1 Corinthians 7:18
@481,786 (H)
@previous (I)
The Bible doesn't exactly forbid it, it just says that it really ought not to be done, that it is completely unnecessary and meaningless to continue it for "religious reasons".
"Watch out for those dogs, those evildoers, those mutilators of the flesh. For it is we who are the circumcision, we who serve God by his Spirit, who boast in Christ Jesus, and who put no confidence in the flesh" - Philippians 3:2-3:3
"Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts." - 1 Corinthians 7:19
"In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ" - Colossians 2:11
"What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision?" - Romans 3:1
"Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision." - 1 Corinthians 7:18
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,839
@previous (F)
> Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision.
Well fuck. :(
> Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision.
Well fuck. :(
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 37 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,847
@481,837 (F)
I just realized something incredibly silly. You know how so many right-wing Americans cite the bible as a reason to keep gay marriage illegal? I wonder how they would react when they find out that Jesus himself speaks out against circumcision, yet they still fucking do it.
Of course, circumcision is performed on a newborn baby while gay marriage is performed on two consenting adults, so I can see why they'd be against gay marriage.
I just realized something incredibly silly. You know how so many right-wing Americans cite the bible as a reason to keep gay marriage illegal? I wonder how they would react when they find out that Jesus himself speaks out against circumcision, yet they still fucking do it.
Of course, circumcision is performed on a newborn baby while gay marriage is performed on two consenting adults, so I can see why they'd be against gay marriage.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,848
I have heard that the roots of the circumcision by christians in america has its connections of anti-masturbation ideas. That is, they thought it would make them not masturbate and thats how its started there by them.
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,849
@previous (J)
That is true. They are circumcised so they are not distracted from being able to worship God, even though Jesus clearly speaks against it.
That is true. They are circumcised so they are not distracted from being able to worship God, even though Jesus clearly speaks against it.
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,851
@481,848 (J)
what an incredibly bright idea this was.
like seriously, i am enniggered by there sheer genious
what an incredibly bright idea this was.
like seriously, i am enniggered by there sheer genious
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,852
@previous (I)
Would you rather have your son masturbating, or reading the bible? If you don't want your son going to hell, get the cut for him!
Would you rather have your son masturbating, or reading the bible? If you don't want your son going to hell, get the cut for him!
Elim joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,857
Is somebody a whiny jealous bitter baby??
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,873
@previous (Elim)
Yeah, I'm a bit jealous that women are protected under the law from genital mutilation and that male babies have their foreskins harvested so Oprah can look younger.
Yeah, I'm a bit jealous that women are protected under the law from genital mutilation and that male babies have their foreskins harvested so Oprah can look younger.
Elim replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,874
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,875
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,876
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,878
Elim replied with this 12 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,879
@481,875 (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
No, you're a whiny baby for positing that women have some advantage over men in the process of pointing out that circumcision is something you don't agree with
You don't need to insert anti feminist sentiments into unrelated posts unless you are a whiny fucking baby complaining about how being a boy is so unfair
No, you're a whiny baby for positing that women have some advantage over men in the process of pointing out that circumcision is something you don't agree with
You don't need to insert anti feminist sentiments into unrelated posts unless you are a whiny fucking baby complaining about how being a boy is so unfair
Elim double-posted this 12 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,880
Elim triple-posted this 12 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,881
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,882
@481,879 (Elim)
What injustices have you faced as a girl? Getting a V6 mustang for your 16th birthday instead of a V8? LOL!!!
@481,880 (Elim)
@previous (Elim)
> being this mad
> being this obsessed
What injustices have you faced as a girl? Getting a V6 mustang for your 16th birthday instead of a V8? LOL!!!
@481,880 (Elim)
@previous (Elim)
> being this mad
> being this obsessed
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Elim replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,885
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
You're right most girls have it Better than a huuuuge pasty dumbass boy in the Midwest
Your life sucks so I'll just stop
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
You're right most girls have it Better than a huuuuge pasty dumbass boy in the Midwest
Your life sucks so I'll just stop
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,886
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,888
@481,878 (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
Sorry, too busy enjoying the lube-free masturbation my foreskin affords.
Sorry, too busy enjoying the lube-free masturbation my foreskin affords.
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,889
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,891
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
Doing it by pulling an MRA and attacking women will not get you anywhere.
Doing it by pulling an MRA and attacking women will not get you anywhere.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,892
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,904
@481,891 (C)
I made fun of their silly campaign.
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
The Senslip is rubbish. lol
I made fun of their silly campaign.
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
The Senslip is rubbish. lol
Anonymous H replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,917
@481,837 (F)
Anon F
> And they are all ridiculous. Especially the Christians, for the Bible specifically commands them NOT to do it.
Anon F
> The Bible doesn't exactly forbid it
Lol. You rock. You embody the only type of "Christians" I have (except maybe once or twice) ever met: Self contradictory and stupid to the point of refuting your own arguments within the same conversation. You guys seem like real winners!
Anon F
> And they are all ridiculous. Especially the Christians, for the Bible specifically commands them NOT to do it.
Anon F
> The Bible doesn't exactly forbid it
Lol. You rock. You embody the only type of "Christians" I have (except maybe once or twice) ever met: Self contradictory and stupid to the point of refuting your own arguments within the same conversation. You guys seem like real winners!
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 12 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,918
And really.. The only actual (To pull a Mountainman trick out of my back pocket...) Christians I have ever met have been homeless. Most of them really didn't give much of a shit about how much of the Bible I had read; they really were just thankful that someone gave a fucking shit about someone else. And yes, they actually gave a fucking shit -- they actually felt glad that someone helped them and genuinely wanted to help that person back if they could. Those people wished they had more so that they could go help people in turn. I say that mostly because I have met people who weren't directly asking for something and expressed wonder that I would stop and help someone. :/ Holy ever-loving fuck! It's not ideological, if anything it's humanitarian. I'm not religious, but helping people shouldn't be...
Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,923
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,938
@481,873 (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
> foreskins harvested
That Company is SkinMedica and they are only 4-5 minutes just North of me. Have many friends who work there. One a Surfer gal with skin burnt a bit by so much sun here, tried it
On one half of her face and none on other for a few months and we her Surfing buds were Guinea pigs and looked daily at fact - She never told us which side was which.
Could not tell any difference - That said she does have gal friends who have tried and it worked for them.
> foreskins harvested
That Company is SkinMedica and they are only 4-5 minutes just North of me. Have many friends who work there. One a Surfer gal with skin burnt a bit by so much sun here, tried it
On one half of her face and none on other for a few months and we her Surfing buds were Guinea pigs and looked daily at fact - She never told us which side was which.
Could not tell any difference - That said she does have gal friends who have tried and it worked for them.
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,939
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,940
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
Damn that Anon E was Thee or I or eye
Yes it is disturbing - Some truly wonderful jokes are told - Company throws some very nice parties but the jokes are told in corners as management is now very careful because back some tyme they became part of a much larger set of companies - So TOP managers no longer create jokes but the ones they used to tell are re-cycled at parties.
Foreskin has life after death LoL
Damn that Anon E was Thee or I or eye
Yes it is disturbing - Some truly wonderful jokes are told - Company throws some very nice parties but the jokes are told in corners as management is now very careful because back some tyme they became part of a much larger set of companies - So TOP managers no longer create jokes but the ones they used to tell are re-cycled at parties.
Foreskin has life after death LoL
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,951
@previous (Syntax)
It doesn't make sense because there are better ways of getting stem cells than through baby dicks. Like through umbilical cords.
It doesn't make sense because there are better ways of getting stem cells than through baby dicks. Like through umbilical cords.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,959
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
I get your point. Doubt a single doctor chops chops chops of part of dick in order to get SkinMedica money in2 their wallets.
Walter remind me - Your Nordic of orgin and some other genetic mix?
I get your point. Doubt a single doctor chops chops chops of part of dick in order to get SkinMedica money in2 their wallets.
Walter remind me - Your Nordic of orgin and some other genetic mix?
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,963
@previous (Syntax)
Mostly Scottish/Irish descent, but with fractional Polish/German on my mother's side. Was always told I looked like my Grandpa on her side.
Mostly Scottish/Irish descent, but with fractional Polish/German on my mother's side. Was always told I looked like my Grandpa on her side.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,964
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
Yea just needed to be reminded, that you want other Polish/German - Scottish/Irish immigrants are not so much so good for USA.
Yea just needed to be reminded, that you want other Polish/German - Scottish/Irish immigrants are not so much so good for USA.
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,966
@previous (Syntax)
I don't know, the Scottish and Northern Irish mainly keep to themselves in the Appalachian mountains. A lovely place, but not really hospitable. A wonder they can live so well all things considered.
I don't know, the Scottish and Northern Irish mainly keep to themselves in the Appalachian mountains. A lovely place, but not really hospitable. A wonder they can live so well all things considered.
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,967
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
> Appalachian mountains
I viewed a movie long ago. Deliverance. Appears Incest was their only option.
> Appalachian mountains
I viewed a movie long ago. Deliverance. Appears Incest was their only option.
HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,968
Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,977
@previous (HaikerensGuide !TBODHONKEY)
LOL none of them Ash jews in my background
That said for all dem who follow the bible - We are all decedents of serious Incest of Adam n Eve n them many kiddlets they had to had only one choice which was to do each other.
LOL none of them Ash jews in my background
That said for all dem who follow the bible - We are all decedents of serious Incest of Adam n Eve n them many kiddlets they had to had only one choice which was to do each other.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #481,984
@481,940 (Syntax)
I'm just taking a stab in the dark here.. was one of the jokes about calling someone 'baby-faced'?
I'm just taking a stab in the dark here.. was one of the jokes about calling someone 'baby-faced'?
