Minichan

Topic: Energy drinks What you may not know

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv started this discussion 12 years ago #34,963

http://dailybuzzlive.com/archives/4763

Energy drinks such as Red Bull really do contain extracts made from Bull urine and semen.

Enjoy your energy drink.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #481,194

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/fooddrink/fl/Do-Energy-Drinks-Contain-Bull-Semen.htm

Anonymous B double-posted this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,195

http://energydrink.redbull.com/is-taurine-made-from-bulls-testicles

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,196

> A study done by Longhorn Cattle Company, tested some of the top energy drink brand
> The video was then Leaked, leaving to us this secret they have tried to keep quiet for so long.

So was it the study or the leaked video that revealed this? No link to the study or a story about the study? This reads like sketchy clickbait, but it's almost worth it just for this photo.

Elim joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 35 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #481,198

Yeah it doesn't make sense to do that at all just believe them when they say the synthesize it ok? Don't be a dumbass

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #481,204

Dumbass op

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,216

They have taurine, which comes from animal tissue. Still gross, though. I drink kale shakes for energy.

squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,218

@previous (F)
actually taurine is easily synthetically synthesized, as a food additive they don't make it from animal extracts. but you're right, all mammals make taurine naturally.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,242

@481,216 (F)
You are a fool

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,243

@481,216 (F)
Kale shakes are the most disgusting thing I have ever attempted to drink.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,255

don't care

if it was bull seamen on its own then that would be gross but this doesn't even really matter

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

dead dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,257

implying red bull wouldnt be much much much more expensive if it actually contained bull semen

Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,259

@481,218 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Yeah, I'd like to see you prove that. I know for a fact that they don't do that whole "synthetic" thing.
@481,242 (H)
You're an even bigger fool for even calling someone a fool.
@481,243 (I)
You don't drink it for the taste. What the crap is wrong with you people?

squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,261

@previous (F)

> Yeah, I'd like to see you prove that. I know for a fact that they don't do that whole "synthetic" thing.

oh, okay...
Taurine is naturally produced in the testicles of many mammals. Urban legends suggest that taurine is extracted from the semen and/or urine of bulls. While it is true that taurine is found in these sources, nearly all commercially available taurine is chemically synthesized.

Synthetic taurine is obtained from isethionic acid (2-hydroxyethanesulfonic acid), which in turn is obtained from the reaction of ethylene oxide with aqueous sodium bisulfite.

Another approach is the reaction of aziridine with sulfurous acid. This leads directly to taurine.

In 1993, approximately 5,000–6,000 tons of taurine were produced for commercial purposes; 50% for pet food manufacture, 50% in pharmaceutical applications.

As of 2010, China alone has more than 40 manufacturers of taurine. Most of these enterprises employ the ethanolamine method to produce a total annual production of about 3,000 tons.
any more questions for me?

I have one for you though, are you aware of the google thing you can do to search for information about stuff?

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Syntax joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,293

13 year old Bobby tried to argue with me about the Taurine in Red Bull as actual Bull ejaculation

Just like Aspirin's acetylsalicylic acid now Synthesized cause its just not practical anymore to bottle up the bark of a Willow Tree

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,295

@previous (Syntax)
I beg your pardon, sir, I merely present the facts and will you be kind enough to note that I am 16

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,301

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
13-16 er your Math skills are not expected 2b good at your young age. Based on when u started to use AnT and the tyme its been kaput - Anyway Matt changes ages as his is now 33 as posted in China and he changes mine to because he wants me dead sooner then latter.

So you really think the Aspirin in bottles in made from that Willow Tree bark stuffed in?

Also when you read something published on web its best to have an open mind and check out the facts - Example is a post I just made with reference to who published it - Actually I first viewed the info on a Chan but do not remember which one or I wood give credit to who/whom/ever/posted it


http://www.tinychan.org/topic/35674

Solar Panels Drain the Sun’s Energy, Experts Say: Sun is being Pulled towards Earth & We all Die

Perhaps you may find a bit of humor in the attached Pole?

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,307

@previous (Syntax)
PM me please.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,308

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
No PM peer to peer here

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,314

@previous (Syntax)
Try using Scatchan.

Anonymous L replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,315

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)

Syntax double-posted this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,318

@481,314 (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
Dang the body can be blank here - anyway

How about you posting something for me on

http://www.duckychan.net/

I think Peer to Peer still works there

Your joint? After a view of how a Commie took over and Free Speech is no longer allowed, I decided that its best not to disturb the over worked software of that place.

Sure I support keeping the poo poo n pee pee stuff off of a chan - But I noticed someones news topics not being very popular but hey perhaps its better for that place to turn in2 95% news posted by just one poster -

I can only imagine you want to discuss such and I could be in error and if so I apologize, but if its about what I think its abouT? It it wood be of little use given you were powerless to prevent my rite to express my opinion about a serious issue of bad Hygiene. (Even IF I found the humor of such and maybe you did not)

And Bobby its similar to Matts current Scam as Re-cycled Ghoul theft of cash from Wallets of Ghoul users - Maybe you think that is just humor - or you excuse your part in being taken because of your er so called very young age at tyme.

If I cannot even make jokes about the new Scam - I mean really dude, wots the point of going there? I also see no problem with just discussing in open here or on TC

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,321

@previous (Syntax)
No problem - Forget it.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #481,323

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
Excellent

Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,364

@481,261 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
I don't need Google. I use my own knowledge.

> nearly all commercially available taurine is chemically synthesized
Pretty much all commercially available taurine is chemically synthesized, except that what's put into energy drinks. This is why most energy drinks are not suitable for vegans/vegetarians.

(Edited 28 seconds later.)

squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,366

@previous (F)

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,422

@481,364 (F)
Ur wasting tyme trying to convince bobby of such. He will argue that they suck the jizz out of bulls to make energy drinks.

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,426

@previous (Syntax)
> except that what's put into energy drinks. This is why most energy drinks are not suitable for vegans/vegetarians.

Try reading the post.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,430

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
I read it - Why does reading it prove that the chemical cited is real bull jizz rather then man made taurine?

Yes I no you say you are young and immature and almost dying or dead but b4 such you might consider checking out your sources b4 you get on high horse and defending such bogus crap - So let me give you another source ok

http://www.snopes.com/food/ingredient/bullsemen.asp

energy drinks such as Red Bull and Monster have bull sperm in them. Is this true?

FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

For you I will limit the copy-pasta and from the link you can read the rest and b more better ejaculated on subject

Origins: Energy drinks such as Red Bull have long been dogged by rumors that they contain dangerous ingredients such as "artificially manufactured stimulants," and in more recent years

such rumors have taken a turn towards the bizarre with claims that various brands of energy drink include "bull semen" or "bull sperm."

More outlandish versions of such rumors maintain that some entity
such as the "Longhorn Cattle Company" performed tests on energy drinks and "found in fact they do contain bull sperm."

(Why a livestock company would want to test commercial beverages for the presence of bull sperm remains unexplained.)

The "bull sperm" rumor seems to stem from the fact that the Red Bull brand of energy drink includes taurine,

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/food/ingredient/bullsemen.asp#SuJ8sYeeDfEZZFjM.99

So bobby if you really R only 15 learn to check out other sources b4 spreading false rumors ok

Shit next you will use 4chan or Reddit as your only source

Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,434

I would like to thank the Mods and Admin for their indulgence. This discussion/argument could be never ending. I shall take up no more of your time. Thank you.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,435

@previous (Rufus !!2Jyh3hDMv)
So sorry to blow your attempt at convincing people that Energy drinks actually contain Bull Jizz.

But hey a 13 year old is not expected to do proper research b4 denigrating companies in business.

Elim, dw & squeegee as well as a number of anons pointed out how foolish you were with the topic

Must hurt to read Anon E H J made fun of you

er by by LoL

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,441

lol, OP is retard.

Beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,442

It's cool. We love lost causes around here. You obviously lack any proof, but you just keep trying! Feel free to try to convince us that free energy is possible sometime!

XXX
OOO
Muah!

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,443

@481,441 (M)
LOL

His Math re his real age shall we say leaves a lot of questions open to discussion - They sure whack him on chans about it.

If he had stuck to the Satire of Bull Jizz in those drinks and I am proud to say I have yet to try any but sure will or maybe not as my energy level is off the books and Triple Espresso does it for me

Now Anon M all you have done is add one more er negative comment his way which may hurt Bobbies feelings some more

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,465

@previous (Syntax)
dont be silly, it has no feelings

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,472

@previous (N)
Now Now

He is human not a bot so he has feelings. Wot he don't have is math skills - after all he says he is just a wee bit of a child n is not expect to be ejaculated.
Also I was in a rush and failed to count all the anons that made fun of him in this thread.
But since he cannot count with numbers most proper perhaps it not matter.

Anonymous N replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,474

@previous (Syntax)
actually, a bot would be an upgrade from his current existance

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,477

@481,472 (Syntax)

> But since he cannot count with numbers most proper perhaps it not matter.

WTF!!!

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,496

@previous (A)
> > But since he cannot count with numbers most proper perhaps it not matter.

(I rote it) You read it - I read n reviewed it again 2X's

OK I see where I made my error - Dyslexia is 2blame

> But since he cannot count with numbers, most proper; perhaps it not matter.

Forgetting that a few around here still use the King English and I tend to rite as Mark Twain instructed me in More better English.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,501

@previous (Syntax)
> tend to rite as Mark Twain instructed me in More better English.

That would be personally I suppose.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,510

@previous (A)
I truly luv messing with English - If I were in France using French I could be taken to court for such in some cases (need to state that b4 our resident lawyer reminds me of French laws on language)

Shakespeare who/whom you may be familiar with was credited with inventing over 1700 of our common words by changing nouns into verbs, changing verbs into adjectives, connecting words never before used together, adding prefixes and suffixes, and devising words wholly original.

William was of course English.

I as a life long fan of Mark Twain (Read all of his books and lots n lots of articles he rote

Mark Twain said: SPELLING

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing. I have a correspondent whose letters are always a refreshment to me, there is such a breezy unfettered originality about his orthography. He always spells Kow with a large K. Now that is just as good as to spell it with a small one. It is better. It gives the imagination a broader field, a wider scope. It suggests to the mind a grand, vague, impressive new kind of a cow.

And

I have had an aversion to good spelling for sixty years and more, merely for the reason that when I was a boy there was not a thing I could do creditably except spell according to the book. It was a poor and mean distinction and I early learned to disenjoy it. I suppose that this is because the ability to spell correctly is a talent, not an acquirement. There is some dignity about an acquirement, because it is a product of your own labor. It is wages earned, whereas to be able to do a thing merely by the grace of God and not by your own effort transfers the distinction to our heavenly home--where possibly it is a matter of pride and satisfaction but it leaves you naked and bankrupt.

AND

I never had any large respect for good spelling. That is my feeling yet. Before the spelling-book came with its arbitrary forms, men unconsciously revealed shades of their characters and also added enlightening shades of expression to what they wrote by their spelling, and so it is possible that the spelling-book has been a doubtful benevolence to us.

AND

...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime.

AND much more on Sperling n Gramer

(Edited 47 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,511

@previous (Syntax)
Nothing quite like brevity.

Anonymous N replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,524

@481,510 (Syntax)
im not reading all that shite

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,527

@481,511 (A)
I tend to notice that in fact you tend to read wot i rite - just saying

@previous (N)
exactly

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,528

@previous (Syntax)
Not really. I agree with @481,524 (N) just a little more subtle in my approach.

Syntax replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #481,541

@previous (A)
LOL

Based on many a months worth of replies from You - where you point out something I rote buried in the middle of a huge mass of text - Let me borrow a line I learned from Elaine.

She said: So now you're finding fault on a sub-atomic level.
-ELAINE BENES, Seinfeld

I modify as - You have found faults looking at my rittings to a sub-atomic level

Oh and for later I without going into Sub Atomic level see that all of a sudden you forgot you told me you were a Christian- More about that someother tyme cause as u no I tend to like to build up a quantity of evidence b4 showing you cards in my hand
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.