Your test scores indicate that you are a tough-minded ultra-conservative; this is the political profile one might associate with a police officer. It appears that you are tolerant towards religion, and have an indifferent and uncompassionate attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a paleoconservative.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a cold-hearted radical hereditarian with a firmly established worldview.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with many strong convictions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,409
@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
lol it's like the exact opposite of mine.
Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,412
lol i know, i wonder what all the different options are?
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,414
@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
don't know what's got my tenderness so high lol
Garak joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,416
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with many strong convictions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 12 years ago, 34 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,417
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 39 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,419
@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
Strongly Agree, but under a certain condition.
Would be better if everyone respected one another but kept separate.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Garak replied with this 12 years ago, 41 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#479,420
What the the Heck i lost my nombers
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#479,421
Progressivism 92.5
Socialism 50
Tenderness 59.375
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate principled egalitarian with several strong convictions.
dead dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#479,423
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,433
legalize whores and gambling and marijuanna and i'll vote for whatever little party you are running for.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,435
@previous (squeegee)
Ya got it! Just the right amount of degeneracy is needed.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,460
i take test half assleep, perhaps this more accurate?
i dunno, i look 2morrow see if this isnt jibberish
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 45 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,465
More or less just as I expected.
Progressivism: 85
Socialism: 25
Tenderness: 43.75
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible pascifistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,474
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate principled egalitarian with several strong convictions.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,480
Progressivism 90
Socialism 62.5
Tenderness 43.75
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate radical egalitarian with several strong convictions.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,482
lol I feel so out of place.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,485
Political Values
Progressivism 82.5
Socialism 25
Tenderness 43.75
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a libertarian.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible radical centrist with an established worldview.
Garak replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,487
@479,482 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Just now? It took this long?
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#479,489