Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later[^][v]#477,553
Patrick Stewart.
Harley !Quinn7Dxrw joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,564
Dany, Hodor and Tyrian.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,565
Arya. She is a little badass, and it wouldn't suprise me if she or sansa made it all the way to the end. Though with the way these books go she may as well just be found in dead in a ditch some random chapter.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 40 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,566
bronn
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,567
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,672
@477,567 (D)
oh? well, from the show probably bronn. but i also loved strong belwas from the book. and shagga. he was the shit with his 2 axes.
but bronn has a larger role and is also taking on an even larger role in that he appears to replace illian payne as jamies left handed sword training partner in the show.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,673
@previous (squeegee)
Yeah those are all pretty awesome. Doesn't suprise me you'd favorite the character that would off their manhoods and feed them to the crows
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 45 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,680
@previous (D)
what? No, shagga cut off other people's manhood and fed them to goats. He had his own. so does bronn. Also so does strong belwas. none of them cut off their own manhood. have you even read the books?
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,681
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
I have, and that is what I meant. I just accidentlied the word enemies.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,682
@previous (D)
oh. gotcha. yeah, shagga was pretty cool. but tyrion is probably my actual favorite. i think he has the best story of anyone so far, tbh, and he is surrounded by the best characters as well.
i want to like dany so much, she's hot, she has dragons, i mean the works.
but her story is kinda dull. i mean, she's got dragons and her story is dull. how is her story dull? okay, i'll admit it's punctuated by some of the very best most thrilling scenes, but it's a slog to get to them, imo.
i can't wait for them to air a dance with dragons, that scene with you know who and the dragons is going to be the shit. but man... it's going to be a real chore getting there.
at least we get the mountain vs oberyn this season, that's going to be fantastic TV
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,683
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
You are right, the dany story is dull, but realistic considering the time that progressed. I mean, it sucks, but considering the dragons weren't even born at the beginning of the books, and baby dragons are pretty much useless.. A lot of her scenes do feel like filler, I just wish she would progress faster.
And oh! That fight is yet to happen? For some reason I thought that would happen before jeoffrey died, so I was disappointed and figured they cut it because budget or some other stupid reason..
edit: also dany is kind of a cunt
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,691
@previous (D)
oh, dany is just a young girl unwise in the ways of war is all.
and yes, that fight is going to be amazing. with as much attention as GRRM gave to describing it in the book i think they'll make a good show of it in the series. also the attack on the wall by mance rayder with giants and worgs and horned foot men is going to be fantastic as well, i can't wait for that.
sucks they cut strong belwas in exchange for a more robust dario, but i guess they had to cut some of the characters. I see strong belwas as a real jewel from the book, a little gem only the readers know about, which is cool i guess. but i wanted to see a boisterous, fat, insolent strong belwas pissing at meereen and killing men only after he'd let them cut them.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,694
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Ugh. Also I dislike how she treated Jorah. Poor guy, though I suppose it's kind of his own fault.
Do you think they left belwas out because he could be considered too vulgar or something? The defecation could have been a bit much.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,709
@previous (D)
oh yeah? did he shit at them too? i must have forgotten that. I think they left him out because he was her "champion" at meereen and they wanted to give that to dario so he could be an even more heroic love interest. In the book he appears swarthy and untrustworthy and in the show he's dashing and honest. he will probably save dany's life by eating all the dates, too. Belwas was a pretty axillary character, i'm not surprised he was cut, or merged, with/for dario.
squeegee !first/o5zA double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,710
@477,694 (D) oh, yeah, jorah, poor guy but he brought it on himself. he was always up in her business and giving her selfish advise.he wasn't being honest with her or forthright about his intentions. he needed to be put in his place.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,715
Is it true that Daenerys is going to lose two of her dragons?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#477,743
dobby
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#477,765
@477,710 (squeegee !first/o5zA) well yeah and the whole spying on her for the lannisters thing, though he did give up on that and was her first, true, follower. I feel like without Jorah dany wouldn't have gotten anywhere close to where she is now
> You realize because it's a fantasy world literally *anything* is possible at the whim of the author, right?
Not in-universe. ;-)
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,950
@previous (A)
...Yes it is. These people are alive, and merrily (or not so merrily) living their lives. Clearly, in-universe, it is possible. If it was not, it would not have happened, and you would not be complaining about it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,952
@previous (D)
If someone who has never seen dragons, in-universe, they would have no reason to accept the reality that they returned regardless of something in the sky.
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,953
@previous (A)
I don't see how this is related at all.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,979
@previous (D)
Just because someone may live in a world of magic and monsters doesn't mean just anything is possible. If a person never seen dragons, they have no reason to believe they returned to the world.
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,980
@previous (A)
I don't think you understand the concept of fantasy, or how to form a coherent argument. A fantasy character not believing dragons exist, does not suddenly make them not exist within that world, so I am not even sure what kind of point you are trying to make.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,982
@previous (D)
Nobody said a character not believing in dragons makes them magically proof out of existence. A character who never saw a dragon has no reason to believe they returned because despite living in a world of magic and monsters anything isn't possible and still requires the same evidences to prove something to be truthful. The fantasy still has it's own laws within it's realms.
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,983
@previous (A)
Yes, characters are not depicted as dimwits and still require convincing. How is this relevant to maesters having medical knowledge that is not possible in our universe? Or magic existing keeping certain people going?
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#477,988
@477,982 (A)
but laws can be broken in fiction like they never existed. even if a character has no reason to believe in aliens or magic that doesn't prohibit the author from suddenly making everyone cockroaches. i get what you are saying, but fiction doesn't need to be consistent in any way, in fact you could frame a whole story as one whole big inconsistent series of events.
like superman flying is inconsistent with the laws of gravity, but readers don't care any more than characters do: a man that can fly, okay, that doesn't mesh with the known laws of physics.
a good example in GoT are tyrion and the dragons, he doesn't believe they are back, he's not seen them, but that doesn't stop GRRM from having mellisandra birth a murderous baby shadow stannis to kill renley.