Anonymous A started this discussion 12 years ago#34,288
People going around telling others to only take scientifically proven things as a source of truth yet believe that its
true that people should not hurt each other.
first strong evidence linking a specific gene to violent behaviour will come, in time, to be seen as a landmark in behavioural genetics. It should also be a wake-up call to critics of behavioural genetics: there is a desperate need to update and refresh arguments which are looking increasingly dogmatic and rusty.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#473,328
oh, Well gee Syntax, Thanks man. Often when i say what i have been here, people just find some information about violence and act like it proves me wrong.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#473,333
science doesn't deal in truth or proof, science deals with evidence.
logic deals with proof which is as close to truth as you can get.
religion deals with faith.
does any of this make sense to you OP, this is 7th grade science stuff.
dw skg II distribution co. llc replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#473,334
@473,332 (A)
since when is ethics science nobody says that shut up