Minichan

Topic: World war 3 has started.

Theo started this discussion 12 years ago #33,844

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10669475/Ukraine-Russia-launches-armed-invasion-as-Obama-warns-Moscow-of-costs-of-intervention.html
I blame the homosexuals.

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later[^] [v] #467,648

I agree with Russia. Crimea is historically Russian and Russia have held a war in this region in the past over 100 years ago. Most of the people hold Russian citizenship (60% I believe) and speek Russian. If these were your people on your border you would also want to protect them. (See The Falkland Islands) Obama needs to keep his nose out of Russian and European politics.

Theo (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,649

@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
I agree with y'all this. Although I don't like the reds, I think they were justified to ban the gays from the Olympics.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,650

Obama and the banksters want WW3 to keep the paper money ponzi scheme going another 50 years.

(Edited 56 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #467,651

@467,648 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
the US is allied to ukraine so they have to get involved

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,653

@previous (D)
The leader of Ukraine was pro Russian until he was outed so no, the Ukraine and US were not allied.

qew joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 57 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,654

@467,648 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
that does make a lot o sense. maybe they should just split it off

squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,655

uh oh. we gonna have to save europe again.
damn frenchie bastards, fight your own wars, stop hiding behind american military might!

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,656

Doesn't sound like anything's really happening yet, which is good. Hopefully this'll blow over soon.

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,657

@467,655 (squeegee)
America hid behind French military might to score a win for their independence.

Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,659

@467,653 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
um yes they are.

after the cold war ukraine agreed to dispose of its nukes on the condition that US protect it from invasion.

bro do you even history?

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,665

@previous (D)
Ukraine is not in NATO.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,669

@467,657 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
oh please, that was over 200 years ago and a different ruling government. the french monarchy were hard ass war-like mother fuckers who kick brit ass. then they got killed by filthy peasants and the new french parliament are just pussies.

(Edited 29 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,673

Nope.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,675

You know what would be more fun? World War Walter.

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Quiet, you. This is no place for your gay logic or reason. It's far better to sensationalise everything.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,683

@467,659 (D)
> dispose of its nukes on the condition that US protect it from invasion

"The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used."

Page 6: http://www.ppnn.soton.ac.uk/bb2/Bb2secK.pdf

The UK, US and Russia apparently have identical agreements with Belarus and Kazakhstan. I lol'd when I saw the Daily Mail's headline about imminent war with Russia. They do love making shit up.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 37 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,687

@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
> I lol'd when I saw the Daily Mail's headline about imminent war with Russia. They do love making shit up.
:-/

They are actively harmful to public perception, at times.

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,688

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> at times

And so is the BBC with its liberal left wing bias.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,787

@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
citation?

Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,791

@previous (squeegee)
The BBC says they're impartial, but then again so does Fox News.

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,827

@467,787 (squeegee)
You are stupid. The BBC has an obvious left wing bias which is also proEU and proUK there is no fucking wikipedia citation or anything like that but you must live in a bubble if you think otherwise.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #468,019

@467,648 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
Obama is a huge phony. He never delivers. American's may be too dumb and propagandized to see this, but you can bet Putin is not.

decibelmilliwatts !!beW+FQoWB joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #468,029

@467,827 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
The BBC, being run by a literal Zionist, is a hilarious excuse for "left-wing".

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #468,096

@468,019 (L)
I never understood the way America voted. You voted for Bush who was tough and got shit done then you vote for Obama who has made America a laughing stock. Sarah Palin even said that Russia would invade Ukraine if Obama was in power and they laughed at her. Now who's laughing.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #468,098

@468,019 (L)
Wait when Obama presses the aggressive button you freak out? Where were you under Bush I and II? I freak out now, but it's only because we don't have any more military to go around and occupy countries that disagree with us. We've used up the "occupying foreign powers that don't support us" reserve.
@468,029 (decibelmilliwatts !!beW+FQoWB)
Jews!!! Thanks We needed someone screaming about Jews in this thread.
@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
Again, "Bush who was tough and got shit done" but Obama's response to Putin is apparently not threatening and akin to asking if he wants to hold some puppies while they paint eachother's toenails at their next sleepover. And, seriously, Sarah Palin's proved too stupid to be relevant anymore.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,110

@previous (N)
Obama isn't pushing the aggressive button at all. He's out there making threats and promises but refusing to back them up when tested.

He might get away with 'if you like your plan, you can keep your plan' when the victims of such lies are weak and helpless. But you can bet any military power will view such unbacked rhetoric as an emperor has no clothes situation.

decibelmilliwatts !!beW+FQoWB replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,201

@468,098 (N)
Ahahahahhahahahhahaha. You fucking tool. Zionism is about white supremacy, not Judaism. They just appropriated the struggle against anti-Semitism to excuse white colonialism at a time when people were starting to have second thoughts about it.

Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,202

@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!beW+FQoWB)
Hmm, I wonder if that's why they made Jews into a race instead of a religion.

decibelmilliwatts !!beW+FQoWB replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,203

@previous (C)
Well, I'm not exactly qualified to speak on the definition of the identity of Jewishness—

But most Zionists are either unambiguously white or white-passing, from what I've seen.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,206

can i get a citation. anyone?

anyone?

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,208

@previous (squeegee)
Why don't you be a smartass and counter peoples points with a link or a citation. Oh right, because you're stupid and lazy.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,211

@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
> not the one making ridiculous claims.
no burden of proof on me atm, otherwise i always do cite my sources, cause it's so easy actually...

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,219

@previous (squeegee)
But people have created links and provided news sorces but you've just jumped in yelling buzzwords.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,223

@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
sources for the topic of conversation are not = sources for background, facts, and opinions.

i.e. saying, "i read an article about a mon who's kid is trans" is not the same as a source for an opinion as to whether transexualism can be understood as a child.

do you get the distinction? i know it's subtle.

ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,226

@previous (squeegee)
I didn't just read it, I linked it.

squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,228

@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
welcome to 2014
still not a source though...

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #468,235

Best Korea launches missiles. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-26427245

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.