Topic: Renouncing White Privilege always amounts to renouncing the Whites who aren’t privileged.
McStinkyNigger !dBGi/iH4eY started this discussion 12 years ago #33,815
Discuss.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #467,315
No one gives a fuck.
Anonymous B (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,316
I am so sick of getting OWNED by Walter, Rapeculture and Meta. Why can't they just stop posting already? I am so damn butthurt and I'd rather have no traffic on this site than have a few politically-incorrect threads.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,317
Not really. Doing so would leave them with victim privilege, which has been working out great for the Jews.
Green joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,318
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,323
@OP du arg?
dw ltd joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,326
Walter his eyes closed
Walter on the ocean
Walter on the ocean
Green replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #467,331
Today I was at the park when a small
child noticed the DIE CIS SCUM t-
shirt I was wearing. Curiously, they
asked me what “cis” meant.
At first, I asked them “Well, are you
transgender?” to which they replied
“No.”
Then I questioned “Do you even
know what transgender is?”
"Yes, I know about that." they
replied. That is when I instantly
screamed at them to shut up
because as someone who is not
trans* they will never understand
what being transgender is about and
that they should choke on a bucket
of glass for even suggesting that they
could have any idea what I and
others like me go through every day.
I stormed off fuming, now knowing
that that cis-child was a dangerous
individual who would completely ruin
trans* activism by knowing things
about transgenderism. People like
that are the exact reason I need my
DIE CIS SCUM t-shirt, as it restores
some of the sanctity that is
destroyed when cis people attempt to
contribute to trans* causes.
child noticed the DIE CIS SCUM t-
shirt I was wearing. Curiously, they
asked me what “cis” meant.
At first, I asked them “Well, are you
transgender?” to which they replied
“No.”
Then I questioned “Do you even
know what transgender is?”
"Yes, I know about that." they
replied. That is when I instantly
screamed at them to shut up
because as someone who is not
trans* they will never understand
what being transgender is about and
that they should choke on a bucket
of glass for even suggesting that they
could have any idea what I and
others like me go through every day.
I stormed off fuming, now knowing
that that cis-child was a dangerous
individual who would completely ruin
trans* activism by knowing things
about transgenderism. People like
that are the exact reason I need my
DIE CIS SCUM t-shirt, as it restores
some of the sanctity that is
destroyed when cis people attempt to
contribute to trans* causes.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,347
@OP
The privilege/oppression mindset leads to the worst sort of stereotyping. All whites are rich and powerful and all black people are poor and powerless. It's actually quite racist and paternalistic if you think about it. Not to mention grossly inaccurate.
Why spend so much time and energy on self abasement? Why not spend that time living a life in which you strive to see no color and set an example for others to follow?
SJWs claim to want a nondiscriminatory world, but they cling more deeply to race and prejudice than any segregationist of yore.
The privilege/oppression mindset leads to the worst sort of stereotyping. All whites are rich and powerful and all black people are poor and powerless. It's actually quite racist and paternalistic if you think about it. Not to mention grossly inaccurate.
Why spend so much time and energy on self abasement? Why not spend that time living a life in which you strive to see no color and set an example for others to follow?
SJWs claim to want a nondiscriminatory world, but they cling more deeply to race and prejudice than any segregationist of yore.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,401
@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Why do you care so much about idiots whining on the Internet? The vast majority of "bloggers" just throw a dart at a board covered in controversial topics and start spewing aimless diatribes.
Why do you care so much about idiots whining on the Internet? The vast majority of "bloggers" just throw a dart at a board covered in controversial topics and start spewing aimless diatribes.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,433
@467,347 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Why should I strive to see no color? That's willful ignorance, and it's not healthy.
Different people are different. Pretending they aren't only guarantees we'll never get along.
Why should I strive to see no color? That's willful ignorance, and it's not healthy.
Different people are different. Pretending they aren't only guarantees we'll never get along.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 30 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,438
@467,347 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
I can agree with this. Emphasising race so very much only morphs it into a sort of racism of its own.
Though I am worried that I am vicariously taking Walter's side, here.
@previous (I)
No, it's not. Seeing no colour is best, because it isn't relevant, not important for interacting with a person.
I can agree with this. Emphasising race so very much only morphs it into a sort of racism of its own.
Though I am worried that I am vicariously taking Walter's side, here.
@previous (I)
No, it's not. Seeing no colour is best, because it isn't relevant, not important for interacting with a person.
Anonymous I replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,448
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> No, it's not. Seeing no colour is best, because it isn't relevant, not important for interacting with a person.
So your position is we should refuse to SEE things, which are actual fact, simply because we wish to avoid confronting the possible dangers and difficulties of acknowledging their existence.
That's straight up denial. And such thinking has never and will never constitute an intelligent, enlightened or rational position, no matter how desperately your libtard lobotomized brain wishes it will.
We're going into pseudoscientific feudalism on the backs of flat-earthers like you. Thank God I became an investment banker.
> No, it's not. Seeing no colour is best, because it isn't relevant, not important for interacting with a person.
So your position is we should refuse to SEE things, which are actual fact, simply because we wish to avoid confronting the possible dangers and difficulties of acknowledging their existence.
That's straight up denial. And such thinking has never and will never constitute an intelligent, enlightened or rational position, no matter how desperately your libtard lobotomized brain wishes it will.
We're going into pseudoscientific feudalism on the backs of flat-earthers like you. Thank God I became an investment banker.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,452
Metæ replied with this 12 years ago, 18 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #467,454
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
This.
@467,448 (I)
Different people are different, and you should indeed judge individuals as necessary. But I don't see any innate supremacy of any race (there's not even any coherent definition of race -- ask any two people what exactly counts as white/black/asian and you'll get two different answers).
This.
@467,448 (I)
Different people are different, and you should indeed judge individuals as necessary. But I don't see any innate supremacy of any race (there's not even any coherent definition of race -- ask any two people what exactly counts as white/black/asian and you'll get two different answers).