Topic: Tired of gay agenda.
dw !jdTkvovFCQ started this discussion 12 years ago #33,681
I'm so tired of this homosexuality movement and marriage equality thing. Same sex marriage is NOT equivalent to traditional marriage. I don't understand why saying that all of a sudden make you a homophobe, hater, and bigot!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #465,528
Destroy marriage.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #465,537
Marriage shouldn't be defined by the state. Marriage shouldn't be a tax deduction.
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #465,538
The reason married couples got certain benefits like tax breaks is becaus married couples were more likely to reproduce. I'm all for civil partnerships but not gay marrage where they receve the same benefits as a traditional marrage.
dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #465,539
Guys, Homosexuals already have the same rights I have. I seriously cannot think of a right that I as a hetero have that a gay person does not. Can you?
We both have the right to go to college, shop anywhere, buy a house, even get married(to a suitable person of opposite sex).
Point is, we all have equality. Gays actually want a right that not even I have!
We both have the right to go to college, shop anywhere, buy a house, even get married(to a suitable person of opposite sex).
Point is, we all have equality. Gays actually want a right that not even I have!
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #465,551
who gives a shit about "traditional marriage" in the first place you fucking idiot
"traditional marriage" only means the government recognizes it, big fucking deal, marriage isn't a government institution in the first place and any argument against gay marriage is lame and dumb as fuck because it either -talks- about it being a government institution or just delves into shitty bible quotes.
> >Guys, Homosexuals already have the same rights I have
no they dont
> >can you?
sure, if my partner was in the hospital dying, I would not be able to visit them on their deathbed because if we were married it would not be recognized by the state, theres also a bunch of tax shit that aren't available to homosexual couples that are available to hetereosexual couples, why dont you just fucking google it?
isnt even the real DW anyways why am i even bothering
"traditional marriage" only means the government recognizes it, big fucking deal, marriage isn't a government institution in the first place and any argument against gay marriage is lame and dumb as fuck because it either -talks- about it being a government institution or just delves into shitty bible quotes.
> >Guys, Homosexuals already have the same rights I have
no they dont
> >can you?
sure, if my partner was in the hospital dying, I would not be able to visit them on their deathbed because if we were married it would not be recognized by the state, theres also a bunch of tax shit that aren't available to homosexual couples that are available to hetereosexual couples, why dont you just fucking google it?
isnt even the real DW anyways why am i even bothering
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #465,558
@previous (E)
The soul purpose of tax breaks for married couples is to encourage people to get married because married people were more likely to reproduce. What are the benefits in gay people getting married?
Don't get me wrong, I'm pro gay marriage in the form of civil partnership but please use some logic
The soul purpose of tax breaks for married couples is to encourage people to get married because married people were more likely to reproduce. What are the benefits in gay people getting married?
Don't get me wrong, I'm pro gay marriage in the form of civil partnership but please use some logic
dw ltd joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #465,560
dw ltd double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #465,561
@465,558 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
it's not logical to assume that marriage's only purpose is procreation or that this is why people get married or that gays are incapable of child-rearing/bearing
it's not logical to assume that marriage's only purpose is procreation or that this is why people get married or that gays are incapable of child-rearing/bearing
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #465,565
lol dw is trying to troll us thanks
dw ltd replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #465,568
@465,558 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
like in my opinion marriage is a dated and fucked up institution but where you are coming from doesn't make total sense or much sense
nobody is saying 'gays can't marry because they don't have kids' because that's not reasonable
people can't marry because people (like you!) don't want them to for whatever reason
like in my opinion marriage is a dated and fucked up institution but where you are coming from doesn't make total sense or much sense
nobody is saying 'gays can't marry because they don't have kids' because that's not reasonable
people can't marry because people (like you!) don't want them to for whatever reason
dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 55 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,572
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,574
i want some fuckin beers
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,586
who cares, marriage is a dead institution. The average age of newlyweds is up by 6 years, it's close to 30 now.
Also divorce is at like 70%.
Also people don't need marriage to promote child bearing. If that was "the real main goal of marriage" then the state would have a vested interest in keeping everyone under the poverty level, because poor people have the most kids.
If you're trying to promote procreation there are better ways to do it than with marriage. (like abstenence only programs in high school.)
Marriage is a tax deduction, and entitles a partner to estates and gives them the right to make life decisions should you become dead or incapacitated. If people are under the impression the "the holy union" will break down, look no further than divorce for heterosexual contributions to that decline. It's an invalid argument that serves no purpose other than to discriminate against people. At one time Blacks marrying whites was going to destroy america... honestly, they should have been more concerned about crooked banks and their unreasonably risky portfolios.
Also divorce is at like 70%.
Also people don't need marriage to promote child bearing. If that was "the real main goal of marriage" then the state would have a vested interest in keeping everyone under the poverty level, because poor people have the most kids.
If you're trying to promote procreation there are better ways to do it than with marriage. (like abstenence only programs in high school.)
Marriage is a tax deduction, and entitles a partner to estates and gives them the right to make life decisions should you become dead or incapacitated. If people are under the impression the "the holy union" will break down, look no further than divorce for heterosexual contributions to that decline. It's an invalid argument that serves no purpose other than to discriminate against people. At one time Blacks marrying whites was going to destroy america... honestly, they should have been more concerned about crooked banks and their unreasonably risky portfolios.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,588
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Nothing is funnier than a thrice-married (with as many mistresses) "conservative" getting all pious about the sacred institution of marriage. Till death do us part my ass.
The state has no rightful place in marriage, though. It should be a private matter between individuals and the church, if any.
Nothing is funnier than a thrice-married (with as many mistresses) "conservative" getting all pious about the sacred institution of marriage. Till death do us part my ass.
The state has no rightful place in marriage, though. It should be a private matter between individuals and the church, if any.
dw ltd joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,613
dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,614
also this is someones actual opinion i copy pasted it i didnt write it
dw ltd replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,615
dw !jdTkvovFCQ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,617
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 11 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #465,661
State marriage must be destroyed for the preservation of male reproductive liberty alone. Any system which favors one gender over the other with respect to genetic offspring is socially manipulative and discriminatory. We know our family courts collectively enforce a strong bias against men, and it appears nothing will ever be done to fix it.
Men are gonna strike against marriage. You wait. I think it's the real reason people want to crush MHRAs, to postpone that day or reckoning just a while longer.
Men are gonna strike against marriage. You wait. I think it's the real reason people want to crush MHRAs, to postpone that day or reckoning just a while longer.