Minichan

Topic: New York gun control advocate facing felony charges for taking concealed handgun onto school grounds

Metæ started this discussion 12 years ago #33,544

Gun control advocate runs afoul of the law he advocated.
Dwayne Ferguson spent more than a decade advocating for nonviolence and peace in the streets of Buffalo.

He was a well-known face in the movement for the SAFE Act, the state law that made carrying a gun on school property a felony. He was also a familiar presence in the hallways of the city’s Harvey Austin Elementary School, where he worked in the after-school program and mentored students.

No one imagined that on Thursday he would show up at the school in possession of a gun, touching off an hours-long lockdown, search and ultimately his arrest on two felony charges.

Ferguson, 52, told WGRZ-TV that he frequently carries the gun, for which he has a permit, and did not realize he had it on him when he went to the school as part of the mentoring program.
www.buffalonews.com/city-region/buffalo-public-schools/associates-defend-man-who-had-gun-in-school-20140207

Normally I'd make some kind of 2nd amendment argument in favor of him but he really did bring this upon himself. I wonder if he regrets his SAFE Act from the comfort of his cell...

(Edited 44 seconds later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 34 minutes later[^] [v] #463,937

Proof positive: gun control advocates are fucking morons.

Metæ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #463,938

Note also that possessing a gun on school grounds was illegal prior to the passage of the SAFE Act, but it was a misdemeanor instead of a felony.

Metæ (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #463,939

@463,937 (B)
At least this one was. He'll be thoroughly disarmed after his felony convictions, though. He's not smart enough to own a gun.

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #463,940

@previous (Metæ)
They're all morons. Disarmament always invites democide.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #463,942

@463,938 (Metæ)

> Note also that possessing a gun on school grounds was illegal prior to the passage of the SAFE Act, but it was a misdemeanor instead of a felony.

Then why are you bitching

Anonymous C double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #463,944

@463,940 (B)

> They're all morons. Disarmament always invites democide.

Thank god for the intelligent ones like breivik and Alex jones right? You faggot idiot.

Metæ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #463,951

@463,942 (C)
I'm not bitching, I'm just pointing out that part of the SAFE Act was redundant.

Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #463,952

@463,944 (C)
Crying to the government for personal protection is what's faggy.

And for the record, it's you who brought up Alex Jones. Nice try at putting words in my mouth and guilt by association, something you libtards love failing at.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #463,988

@463,951 (Metæ)
The SAFE act is just one example of unnecessary legislation to whore for liberal and female votes. No longer are laws made because they're needed, they're made to transform failure to uphold existing laws into votes from the ignorant.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,000

> Aren't liberals and registered democrats responsible for all mass shootings

(Edited 8 minutes later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 10 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,056

Awesome. This one guy being a hypocrite disproves all gun control advocates forever! Yay!

Metæ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,061

@previous (F)
It does, to the same extent that one crazy gun owner diiproves 2nd amendment supporters.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,063

@previous (Metæ)
That logic would work except for the fact crazy gun owners are always attacking gun free zones where defenseless cattle congregate. Talk to me when there's a mass shooting at a gun show or NRA rally.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,066

@464,061 (Metæ)
So... none? I agree that it was hilarious that he went to the trouble to violate a pointlessly specific law, but we all know that you're not allowed to be moderate or neutral on firearms in American politics.

Anonymous F replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,068

@464,061 (Metæ)
This isn't the same extent as people dying, really.

Metæ (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,069

@464,063 (G)
If there is a mass shooting at a gun show or NRA rally, it won't last very long.
@464,000 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
I think whatever insanity possesses people to go on shooting sprees is independent of politics.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #464,082

Just like liberal celebrities are always calling for guns to be banned but they have body guards with guns and make millions of dollars off of movies featuring guns.

Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #464,083

@previous (H)
Whoring out to the Zionist agenda is the first requirement for success in Hollywood. Thanks for reminding us.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 12 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #464,108

@464,082 (H)
How can somebody be a hypocrite for not believing what is essentially a straw man argument?

Itachi Uchiha joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #464,111

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)

> How can somebody be a hypocrite for not believing what is essentially a straw man argument?

How can someone be a hippocrite when ur trying to be smart. You're reported now.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.