This is an obvious example of anglophobia. OP's comment was clearly anglocentric but you intentionally mislabeled it to further marginalize a group of people by robbing them of their culture by throwing them in with a larger group of "White" enough people.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#463,045
You can't debate with a SJW. They only have angry emotions, not reason or critical thinking. You might as well debate a typical American woman.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#463,047
disgusting misogynist nerd circle jerk
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#463,048
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,170
@OP
Projection much? @463,036 (B)
Surprisingly, it's actually zero of those, holy shit. HaikerensGuide managed to go for a whole sentence without getting into oppressive stuff. @463,041 (C)
lel
Please do explain how Anglo(-Saxon) people aren't at the forefront of the social cartel known as whiteness. Please, do. Anglos have been spearheading the white cause for centuries, so... :v @463,045 (D)
Proper analysis of material conditions and social structures requires a fuck of a lot of reason and critical thinking, actually. I've done a hell of a lot more thought since abandoning liberalism. @463,047 (E)
Whoops, you just described pretty much everything spawned from SA, 4chan, ED, and all related sites.
Actually, nerd culture in general, wow.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,180
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
It was ableist, though, because pigeons lack hands suitable to hold chess pieces. It was speciesist because it implicitly stated that pigeons are inferior and eurocentric because chess is a European game and people in other countries may not be able to relate to playing it.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,182
ITT: Walter labels people who argue with him for labeling people.
It's like that's all he knows how to do.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,187
@463,170 (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj) > Please do explain how Anglo(-Saxon) people aren't at the forefront of the social cartel known as whiteness. Please, do. Anglos have been spearheading the white cause for centuries, so... :v
Can you explain how the Chinese aren't at the forefront of the social cartel known as orientalness? They've been advancing the oriental cause for centuries.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,189
@463,180 (B)
Pigeons aren't oppressed via the same mechanisms as disabled human beings. Inability to manipulate chess pieces in the usual manner isn't a deficiency. As for the Eurocentrism, it's entirely ahistorical to imply chess to be a solely European thing. @previous (B)
Not the same thing. Chinese, Japanese, and Korean people do not work in concert on a mass scale to advance their dominance over people of other races and ethnicities. Hegemonic whiteness is a fairly unique phenomenon.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,191
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
So the Han majority in China has always peacefully coexisted with the many ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities in China, not to mention adjacent nations?
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,194
@previous (B)
They have not peacefully coexisted. :v The point is, these groups do not currently work together as a generally uniform sociological bloc. (I'll admit, I kiiiiiiiiiinda fucked up there by condensing the whole of China into one adjective when that's a really iffy reduction at best.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,234
You already did that joke for anons, Walt. Very unoriginal, 0/10.
@463,182 (H)
This. He needs everything catagorised or he'll lose his mind.
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,237
> They have not peacefully coexisted. :v The point is, these groups do not currently work together as a generally uniform sociological bloc. (I'll admit, I kiiiiiiiiiinda fucked up there by condensing the whole of China into one adjective when that's a really iffy reduction at best.)
There's no cohesive club of white nations anymore than all of Asia is one homogenous bloc. Some nations, like the USA and Canada and Australia and England have ties based on a common language and culture heritage being descended from the British Empire but I'd argue the "white" countries are no less linguistically, ethnically, or culturally diverse than the Asian countries. And indeed they don't always play nice with each other: the cold war, WWI, and a good chunk of WWII was fought between nations most would consider "white".
Europe getting along with itself is a very recent thing.
Anonymous C replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#463,257