Topic: Where do you get your political talking points, MC?
Meta started this discussion 12 years ago #33,427
Vote!
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Kos/HuffPo/MSNBC/Jon Stewart | 1 | 20% | |
| Fox News/Hannity/Limbaugh | - | 0% | |
| Stormfront/David Duke/American Third Position | 3 | 60% | |
| Reason/Lew Rockwell/Ludwig von Mises Institute | 1 | 20% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #462,681
Where's the option for people who are not american and don't care about politics?
Meta (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 45 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #462,683
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,684
Option 5: none of the above.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,700
All these options suck, sorry metae.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,710
Minichan, i (a newspaper) and RationalWiki. Sometimes the BB fucking C too.
I have the perfect sources.
I have the perfect sources.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,712
I tend to think for myself.TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,791
@462,710 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
These, plus Private Eye and the Guardian occasionally (ignoring the opinion section).
RationalWiki is grate.
These, plus Private Eye and the Guardian occasionally (ignoring the opinion section).
RationalWiki is grate.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,793
TNG
DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,797
Der Spiegel
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,848
Twet Crew, Aljazeera, furry Marxists, anime Maoists, arguing with liberals and reactionaries, listening to the experiences of others who've faced oppressions that I don't, etcetera. As far as news sources go, I go with BBC, CBC, EI, and a few places like that.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,849
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 12 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,850
Anonymous G replied with this 12 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,854
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
respectable scholars no doubt
political philosophy in 160 characters or less
in cosplay
respectable scholars no doubt
political philosophy in 160 characters or less
in cosplay
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,855
@previous (G)
140. :v
Seriously, it's really simple. What you do is this: you insert a little symbol every 140th character to continue your train of thought, >
> like this. By doing this, you can make an idea go on for much longer than the 140 characters given by a single tweet. It's really quite >
> easy to do, and... well, it works! This is really it.
140. :v
Seriously, it's really simple. What you do is this: you insert a little symbol every 140th character to continue your train of thought, >
> like this. By doing this, you can make an idea go on for much longer than the 140 characters given by a single tweet. It's really quite >
> easy to do, and... well, it works! This is really it.