Topic: Will western niggers ever become civilized...
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 started this discussion 12 years ago #33,356
or will they continue to ride the giant white wave?
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 24 seconds later[^] [v] #461,992
derp
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #461,995
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Is that 'derp' as in 'that's a stupid question bescause they'll always be riding our backs'?
Is that 'derp' as in 'that's a stupid question bescause they'll always be riding our backs'?
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 15 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #461,996
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #461,997
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #461,998
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,000
OP's autism is literally off the charts
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,002
@461,998 (Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw)
I care if your desire is to take it up the shit pipe by some anonymous guy in a fursuit, you're still a fucking degenerate.
I care if your desire is to take it up the shit pipe by some anonymous guy in a fursuit, you're still a fucking degenerate.
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 (OP) double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,003
@462,000 (D)
Yes because niggers are just held back by the white man and anyone who disagres has autism. Fucking liberal.
Yes because niggers are just held back by the white man and anyone who disagres has autism. Fucking liberal.
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,005
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw replied with this 12 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,006
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,007
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,008
@462,006 (Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw)
> autistic child that didn't perfectly line up every single toy
> my sides
> autistic child that didn't perfectly line up every single toy
> my sides
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw replied with this 12 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,009
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw double-posted this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,010
Anonymous D replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #462,011
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,019
so mad
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,047
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Walter, why aren't you taking his side? I thought that people with black skin enraged you?
Walter, why aren't you taking his side? I thought that people with black skin enraged you?
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,048
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,056
@462,003 (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
Actually the majority of today's niggers "being held down" are done so by black women who get pregnant and demand the state go after the fathers for child support. But why look into statistics and reason when race explains everything.
Actually the majority of today's niggers "being held down" are done so by black women who get pregnant and demand the state go after the fathers for child support. But why look into statistics and reason when race explains everything.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,086
@462,047 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I am taking his side. Just that everyone is mad and trying to derail this thread.
I am taking his side. Just that everyone is mad and trying to derail this thread.
ShitArse !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,101
@462,056 (G)
Why don't the use a condom or keep it in their pant? Why don't they be a father like white men. The people keeping blacks down are blacks.
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Thank you
Why don't the use a condom or keep it in their pant? Why don't they be a father like white men. The people keeping blacks down are blacks.
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Thank you
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 41 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,108
@previous (ShitArse !saAqdaazn2)
> Why don't the use a condom or keep it in their pant? Why don't they be a father like white men.
They don't use a condom to get the welfare.
The fathers can't live in the house to get the welfare.
> The people keeping blacks down are blacks.
That's what I said though. But of course, the elite enabled this behavior.
> Why don't the use a condom or keep it in their pant? Why don't they be a father like white men.
They don't use a condom to get the welfare.
The fathers can't live in the house to get the welfare.
> The people keeping blacks down are blacks.
That's what I said though. But of course, the elite enabled this behavior.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #462,109
i still blame it on suffocating insular poverty.> Insular poverty is among a large area or community affected by a number of things. Unlike case poverty, where individuals are poor due to their own circumstances, a group of people are poor because something has affected them entirely. Galbraith suggests that the environment or social status of areas determines the poverty of generations and it continues to repeat among those generations because they can not seem to find a turning point in society to build upon. “The most important characteristic of insular poverty is forces, common to all members of the community, that restrain or prevent participation in economic life at going rates of return.” (Galbraith 408). Community’s that offer poor education have a large impact on the upcoming generations of individuals who are trying to change the insular poverty situations around them and for themselves. Insular poverty is very difficult to remove because of all the factors of the environment that play a role in keeping individuals subject to poverty. “But it remains that advance cannot improve the position of those who, by virtue of self or environment, cannot participate”. (Galbraith 409). Galbraith states that those who suffer from insular poverty cannot escape if they cannot participate in the advances suggested or given and this transition is what makes it difficult to remove insular poverty because the majority of individuals can not be changed by political means.
but i guess that's just me. dumb in, dumb out, basically. If you want to alleviate poverty educate the poor massively. there's no more successful way to do it.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,112
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Nice talking points.
> but i guess that's just me. dumb in, dumb out, basically
Indeed. Only a retard would use pity as a means of forcing your argument.
Nice talking points.
> but i guess that's just me. dumb in, dumb out, basically
Indeed. Only a retard would use pity as a means of forcing your argument.
Anonymous J replied with this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,113
@462,109 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
> educate the poor massively.
Yeah, cause it's so much better to spend money on that then to give them actual property.
> educate the poor massively.
Yeah, cause it's so much better to spend money on that then to give them actual property.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,114
@462,112 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)i don't think you even know who John kenneth Galbraith is. how dare you attempt to besmirch his work as mere pity. if you go to college, then we'll talk. But this ignorant-know-it-all schtick of yours is really wearing thin.
squeegee !first/o5zA double-posted this 12 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,115
@462,113 (J)
give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. teach a man to fish and he'll become gainfully employed, command a living wage, support his family and never have to worry about taking charity again.
yup. i agree with you entirely.
give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. teach a man to fish and he'll become gainfully employed, command a living wage, support his family and never have to worry about taking charity again.
yup. i agree with you entirely.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 12 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,116
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,117
Anonymous J replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,119
@462,115 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
That's a reductionist and purposely deceptive attitude. Either you want to fuck over the poor while pretending to help them or you just to fucking indoctrinated and stupid to know better.
In the real world, capital beats labor every time. Fishing boats cost money. Fishing regulations cost money. Teaching a man to fish doesn't make the required resources magically appear. The best it can do is make them a wage slave for someone who has access to such resources or force them into debt attempting to acquire them.
Moreover, you seem to be making an assumption that poor people, purely because they are poor, will necessarily dispose of the property rather than put it to productive use. That's elitist as fuck.
That's a reductionist and purposely deceptive attitude. Either you want to fuck over the poor while pretending to help them or you just to fucking indoctrinated and stupid to know better.
In the real world, capital beats labor every time. Fishing boats cost money. Fishing regulations cost money. Teaching a man to fish doesn't make the required resources magically appear. The best it can do is make them a wage slave for someone who has access to such resources or force them into debt attempting to acquire them.
Moreover, you seem to be making an assumption that poor people, purely because they are poor, will necessarily dispose of the property rather than put it to productive use. That's elitist as fuck.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,120
@previous (J)ok, i don't mean to be pedantic, but to "educate a man in a profession he is capable of working" is what i meant to imply when i used the to teach a man to fish metaphor. i didn't mean to imply that training a man in fishing specifically prepares a man for adult life. maybe give them vocational school vouchers for heating and air conditioning repair training?
> Moreover, you seem to be making an assumption that poor people, purely because they are poor, will necessarily dispose of the property rather than put it to productive use.
well, don't jump to the assumption that i don't also believe the only way to "eradicate" poverty is with massive investments in communities. As Galbraith states in the above selection, and i'm paraphrasing, but he says that even upwardly capable people are held back when outward forces are too overwhelming. And i do believe that to be true, plenty of people "escape the ghetto," but it was not because they were smarter, it was because their situation was just different enough to allow escape. there are plenty of smart, capable people who can't, and will never escape the ghetto.
as hard as they might try.
So yeah, i think massive investments into a community is the only way to solve poverty. Education is the best long term solution, but also has the slowest return. you invest in education today and will see those kids having careers 20 years later.
for more immediate results spend heavily in poor communities. Make sure they are clean, have good roads, public transportation, access to facilities such as working electricity, gas and plumbing, make sure there are parks and community centers. Just good urban planning stuff. infrastructure. And plenty of police and social services.
If you don't do that you can build as many urban housing projects in the ghetto as you like, they'll just turn to slums. that's not elitist, that's a blight on most large american city planning departments.
anecdotally in dallas they've done away with "projects" because it centralized and intensified poverty in those areas. Now they use the HUD dept and spread it out as thin as possible. It's practically invisible in most areas, poverty is. except for the occasional psychotic hobo you wouldn't know it existed here unless you wandered down the wrong elevated highway off-ramp.
squeegee !first/o5zA double-posted this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #462,121
i will also add that i am talking about welfare. In fact i would have no problem if the government just gave people a guaranteed minimum income, like 25 grand or something, instead of hundreds of agencies, vouchers, coupons and stamps for things like food and diapers.
can't work? cool. here's $25 grand. see you next year.
don't want to work? sweet. that's your choice, here's $25 grand to help get you by. see you in 2015!
just lazy and want to smoke cheap pot and play vidya? niiiice, here's your dough. come back next time!
honestly i think it would be cheaper to do that than to do what we do right now what with all the agencies and bureaucracy.
can't work? cool. here's $25 grand. see you next year.
don't want to work? sweet. that's your choice, here's $25 grand to help get you by. see you in 2015!
just lazy and want to smoke cheap pot and play vidya? niiiice, here's your dough. come back next time!
honestly i think it would be cheaper to do that than to do what we do right now what with all the agencies and bureaucracy.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)