Topic: >not dressing up as a woman and flashing your genitals at little girls in locker rooms
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY started this discussion 12 years ago #33,201
kook joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #460,556
That's horrible! These transgenders need to be culled. They're nothing but trouble, all of them.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #460,558
how about adding privacy stalls for either the transgendered, the shy, uptight families, or just people private about their nude forms.
public spaces, even locker rooms, don't have to be fully exposed.
public spaces, even locker rooms, don't have to be fully exposed.
kook replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,564
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
The transgenders will just go into female stalls anyway. They don't care about having their own stalls, all they want is to sexually harass women.
The transgenders will just go into female stalls anyway. They don't care about having their own stalls, all they want is to sexually harass women.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 12 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,565
squeegee joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,568
@460,564 (kook)
Why are there female stalls and male stalls?How about generic stalls anyone can use privately? I don't know why we force people to be naked in public just becuase people of the same gender are around. People can be gay, just becuase I'm surrounded by other guys doesn't mean I'm not being sexually ogled. Lesbians eyeball women in locker rooms more than gay transgendereds, I promise you. That tranny won't rape you, I bet he can't even get aroused with all that estrogen.
But that dike over there staring down all the teen girls might.
Why are there female stalls and male stalls?How about generic stalls anyone can use privately? I don't know why we force people to be naked in public just becuase people of the same gender are around. People can be gay, just becuase I'm surrounded by other guys doesn't mean I'm not being sexually ogled. Lesbians eyeball women in locker rooms more than gay transgendereds, I promise you. That tranny won't rape you, I bet he can't even get aroused with all that estrogen.
But that dike over there staring down all the teen girls might.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,575
@previous (squeegee)
Some restaurants have 1 room bathrooms and sometimes unisex too. Also, why do you go full nude in a public restroom?
Some restaurants have 1 room bathrooms and sometimes unisex too. Also, why do you go full nude in a public restroom?
squeegee replied with this 12 years ago, 29 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,578
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Think showering at a gym locker room or a restroom with no stall doors.
Think showering at a gym locker room or a restroom with no stall doors.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,580
@previous (squeegee)
Oh, I see, basically like every teenage drama involving a boy who is too ashamed to shower in the boy's locker room?
Oh, I see, basically like every teenage drama involving a boy who is too ashamed to shower in the boy's locker room?
kook replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,597
@460,568 (squeegee)
What the hell. So now you're accusing women of being perverts? Even though we have countless news stories of men trying to break into female restrooms to sexually harass women? I bet you were abused as a child and take it out on women. Please, tell us about it.
What the hell. So now you're accusing women of being perverts? Even though we have countless news stories of men trying to break into female restrooms to sexually harass women? I bet you were abused as a child and take it out on women. Please, tell us about it.
dw joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 13 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,602
i like phrasing like 'exposing himself' wherein a non-issue is made into an issue
ie connotation of 'exposure' (crime)/misgendering the female in question
ie connotation of 'exposure' (crime)/misgendering the female in question
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,605
dw replied with this 12 years ago, 24 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,606
@previous (E)
the way squeegee is talking makes it sound like he has some kind of personal resentment against women this is a reasonable reply by kook
the way squeegee is talking makes it sound like he has some kind of personal resentment against women this is a reasonable reply by kook
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,610
dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,613
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,615
@460,597 (kook)> I bet you were abused as a child and take it out on women. Please, tell us about it.
whoa, hold on there, princess. that's a pretty awful assumption to make about someone. my parents never punished me like that, and i don't take anything out on "women." sure, i let sluts take advantage of me, but that's because i'm an opportunist, not a misogynist.
how dare you make that conclusion without having met me!
> Even though we have countless news stories of men trying to break into female restrooms to sexually harass women?
yeah, because when women break into male restrooms to harass men they don't report it to the news, they get blowjobs and them shamefully hide it from their wife who eventually finds out about it (usually because the strumpet told her) and the couple gets divorced. there's a reason home-wrecker is directed at mistresses, women can be conniving and ruthless when it comes to stealing another woman's man.
> What the hell. So now you're accusing women of being perverts?
yeah, that's exactly right. every woman has her kink. and i'm not saying it's exclusive to women, i'm saying both men and women are perverts.
i don't know why you seem to think that women can't be violent or be deviant sexual perverts. trust me, they can be those things and more if you find the right girl. not all of them are deviant perverts, most of them are just perverts and get off on light bondage/restraint, exhibitionism/voyerism (big ones imo for women), pictures/video (which i would normally rank as exhibitionism, but it's such a common trend these days it gets its own category), or just plain old ordinary catting around town cheatin' on her man (it's pretty popular).
Meta joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 10 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,621
Admittedly it's been a while (about a decade) since I've been in a locker room and I know facilities vary, but aren't there changing booths or stalls to provide a modicum of privacy?
Also Kook, instead of being upset at the transgender people, why not take aim against the laws that allow this? We all know god hates fags and that's why he made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve and a he-she flashing its dick at little girls. We need to get a state amendment on the ballot. Your chromosomes will determine which facilities you use.
Also Kook, instead of being upset at the transgender people, why not take aim against the laws that allow this? We all know god hates fags and that's why he made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve and a he-she flashing its dick at little girls. We need to get a state amendment on the ballot. Your chromosomes will determine which facilities you use.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,625
@previous (Meta)
This is why I prefer one room bathrooms at restaurants. There is always 2 and nobody seems to care who uses them. A male employee at El Pollo Loco told me to just use the women's restroom instead of waiting for the men's. The downside is they are usually dirty to all hell.
Chromosomes doesn't seem really relevant here. Maybe it should depend on rather or not you can get periods?
This is why I prefer one room bathrooms at restaurants. There is always 2 and nobody seems to care who uses them. A male employee at El Pollo Loco told me to just use the women's restroom instead of waiting for the men's. The downside is they are usually dirty to all hell.
Chromosomes doesn't seem really relevant here. Maybe it should depend on rather or not you can get periods?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Meta replied with this 12 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,626
@460,575 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> Some restaurants have 1 room bathrooms and sometimes unisex too. Also, why do you go full nude in a public restroom?
It's a well-known fact that all transgender people only do it so they can strip nude in public and flash everyone in locker rooms and perv at Real Womyn™ getting undressed.
> Some restaurants have 1 room bathrooms and sometimes unisex too. Also, why do you go full nude in a public restroom?
It's a well-known fact that all transgender people only do it so they can strip nude in public and flash everyone in locker rooms and perv at Real Womyn™ getting undressed.
Will Ferrell replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,629
Meta replied with this 12 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,630
@460,625 (E)
@previous (Will Ferrell)
I was being sarcastic. I genuinely cannot tell, however, if Kook is being serious or trolling.
@previous (Will Ferrell)
I was being sarcastic. I genuinely cannot tell, however, if Kook is being serious or trolling.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 39 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,636
dw ltd replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,647
kook replied with this 12 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,674
@460,605 (E)
Stop saying that all women are crazy.
@460,615 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
I get it, you're trying to say that all women are perverts to so you can justify male harassment and abuse of them. You make me sick.
Does anybody have squeegee's location? We should contact the authorities in his area, it's pretty obvious that he's abusing women.
@460,630 (Meta)
You were making some good points. I'm disappointed that you were being deliberately misleading.
Stop saying that all women are crazy.
@460,615 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
I get it, you're trying to say that all women are perverts to so you can justify male harassment and abuse of them. You make me sick.
Does anybody have squeegee's location? We should contact the authorities in his area, it's pretty obvious that he's abusing women.
@460,630 (Meta)
You were making some good points. I'm disappointed that you were being deliberately misleading.
Meta replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,680
@previous (kook)
If the transwoman in the OP were to have full sex reassignment surgery, could s/he use the women's locker room?
If the transwoman in the OP were to have full sex reassignment surgery, could s/he use the women's locker room?
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Meta double-posted this 12 years ago, 6 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,683
@460,674 (kook)
> You were making some good points. I'm disappointed that you were being deliberately misleading.
Oh, that was just Westboro Baptist Church talking points.
> You were making some good points. I'm disappointed that you were being deliberately misleading.
Oh, that was just Westboro Baptist Church talking points.
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 22 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,687
@460,674 (kook)
I'm not saying all women are crazy at all. I'm just saying you need some professional counseling.
I'm not saying all women are crazy at all. I'm just saying you need some professional counseling.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #460,695
@460,674 (kook)
> I get it, you're trying to say that all women are perverts to so you can justify male harassment and abuse of them. You make me sick.
are you an insane person? i don't know why you feel that you have to harass men and berate them when you can't do anything more than speculate about an individual's behavior. women lumping all men into the category "abusive" is just as bad as men lumping all females into the category "sex toys." in fact the whole women's feminist movement thing smacks of a feminine passive aggressive ploy to "give us a taste of our own medicine" when it would actually be better to have an open dialog between the sexes instead of hurling insults and making ignorant accusations.
of course try explaining that to a woman.
> I get it, you're trying to say that all women are perverts to so you can justify male harassment and abuse of them. You make me sick.
are you an insane person? i don't know why you feel that you have to harass men and berate them when you can't do anything more than speculate about an individual's behavior. women lumping all men into the category "abusive" is just as bad as men lumping all females into the category "sex toys." in fact the whole women's feminist movement thing smacks of a feminine passive aggressive ploy to "give us a taste of our own medicine" when it would actually be better to have an open dialog between the sexes instead of hurling insults and making ignorant accusations.
of course try explaining that to a woman.
kook replied with this 12 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #460,720
You'll all be punished when the matriarchy rises.
kook double-posted this 12 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #460,722
@460,695 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Please, somebody give me squeegee's location. He has an obvious hatred for women. He is very likely an abuser.
Please, somebody give me squeegee's location. He has an obvious hatred for women. He is very likely an abuser.
kookerpie !!TPesVWBmL joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 48 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #460,742
I just came into this thread, retards.
kook replied with this 12 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #460,745
@previous (kookerpie !!TPesVWBmL)
Fuck off. I bet you're a transgender agent here to try and bismirch my name.
Fuck off. I bet you're a transgender agent here to try and bismirch my name.
Anonymous E replied with this 12 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #460,748
Harley !Quinn7Dxrw joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,866
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,867
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,868
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 12 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,869
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,878
@460,867 (L)
> implying that I hadn't dropped all pretense of restraint at that point
> implying that I was ever actively trying to be believable
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Actually, some people thought I was you at first. Which I was surprised by.
> implying that I hadn't dropped all pretense of restraint at that point
> implying that I was ever actively trying to be believable
@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Actually, some people thought I was you at first. Which I was surprised by.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 12 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,880
Anonymous B replied with this 12 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,881
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #460,892
@460,568 (squeegee)
> just becuase I'm surrounded by other guys doesn't mean I'm not being sexually ogled.
Are you hot?
> just becuase I'm surrounded by other guys doesn't mean I'm not being sexually ogled.
Are you hot?