Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: What is your take on the correlation between height and intelligence?

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #32,582

Wikipedia page on the issue
Princeton paper describing their findings (pdf)

Undeniable correlation.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 24 minutes later[^] [v] #454,587

@OP
Regarding the second link: I'm sorry I'm only skimming the article right now, but do they report an N for the NCDS data anywhere? What is it?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #454,770

@previous (B)

lolidk

Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,789

@previous (A)
Oh yeah, I found it. I had been drinking heavily when I the posted the other thing. Anyway, they are trying to measure intelligence by employment and earnings. (and, yeah, they're economists) Have fun with doing that. People who study intelligence for a living still can't agree on how to measure it and debate it endlessly. What you are trying to measure, i.e. your functional definition of "intelligence", isn't coming close.

That said, the statistics are pretty sound, the sample size is great, and tall people tend to do better. One might speculate, as the authors mention, that people learn to respect people taller than them as more intelligent and experienced through training early in life when adults are both taller and smarter than you. (That's a psychological argument, and might be one factor among many in this puzzle.) There might be some biological effects (a rise in hormone secretion during a certain developmental period, "growth spurts" help you remember things or hurry brain development) that lead to height as well as brain development )
Although, human brains are fucking complex and develop certain skills at certain times. We're not yet certain exactly how or when "brain development" for $SOMESKILL is important/critical/relevant yet. So.... dunno.

Final assessment of that study: Your measure of "intelligence" is a little bent, but pretty solid for work by economists. Good stuff.

Is there a correlation: Yes, according to one study. In general? Probably. That correlation probably exists for a number of factors. What are those? Good fucking question.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,795

@previous (B)

Some conclusions I think we could draw:
* "invader zim" had it right all along with the heightocracy
* Height still works better than affirmative action
* Pygmies should not take the stanford-binet

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,796

Women tend to be shorter than men.

Okay now this makes sense.

Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,798

@454,795 (A)
Well, I sort of think the underlying question here is: Do people perceive taller people as more intelligent and treat them accordingly?

> Height still works better than affirmative action
As long as pygmies don't take the Standford Bin- Fuck. Okay.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,800

@previous (B)

> > Height still works better than affirmative action
> As long as pygmies don't take the Standford Bin- Fuck. Okay.
I don't understand what you are doing here.

Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #454,802

@previous (A)
itIsAMysteryGhost.jpg :/
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.