Minichan

Topic: True or False

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #32,392

A female-to-male person and a male-to-female person dating is considered homosexual both biologically and psychologically.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later[^] [v] #452,720

A biological male dating a biological female: Not homosexual
OP: homosexual

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,724

@previous (B)
You only answered half of the question.

Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,730

No. An FtM and an MtF transsexual start out as biological female and male, respectively. Surgery and hormones can't change XX or XY chromosomes, so it's not homosexual biologically. As for gender identity, it would be someone identifying as male dating someone identifying as a female, so it's not homosexual psychologically, either.

Actually, I'd argue it's doubly heterosexual: you have a man who is a woman dating a woman who is a man, making for a biological f-m and a psychological m-f bond. That is, @OP's scenario makes for two heterosexual pairings.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,733

@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
So the answer would be false?

Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,736

@452,720 (B)
I'm going to pretend that "homosexuality" refers only to biological sex and not gender identity.

Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,742

@452,733 (A)
You forgot to include a poll, but yes.

false

Meta !PARAdoxiHw double-posted this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #452,743

@452,733 (A)
I guess it could also be argued that the biological and psychological gender identities cancel each other out, making for a neutral charge.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #452,838

True or False:

An OP posting a stupid question is considered a faggot.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 11 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #452,878

@previous (D)
False, because logic dictates that the OP is always a faggot.

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 48 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #452,880

@previous (A)
Well, it would still be true though.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #452,883

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
So does this mean it's a liar paradox?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #452,884

@previous (A)
No.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 13 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #452,896

@452,883 (A)
Not at all
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.