Topic: Had sex with a shemale last night. Regretted it as soon as her dick was in my mouth.
Dr. Autphag !Ep8pui8Vw2 started this discussion 13 years ago #32,170
I was on my knees while this shemale choked me with her foul tasting dick and I sobered up and I realized homosexuality is disgusting and wrong. I told her I'd changed my mind but she just laughed. She thumbed some lube into my ass and fucked me. It took her forever to finish and I cried the whole time. My asshole is still raw and there was blood in my stool. She used a condom but I'm still going to get tested.
The whole experience was just nasty. I need to stop getting drunk.
The whole experience was just nasty. I need to stop getting drunk.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #450,530
Yeah, this didn't work on Tinychan, bud.
MC might fall for it, plausibly. Their userbase hasn't impressed me so far.
MC might fall for it, plausibly. Their userbase hasn't impressed me so far.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 50 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,531
fgsfds
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,538
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 40 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,540
@previous (D)
....aaaand I was proven correct.
Yeah, this place is a collectivist hivemind on levels that make TC look bustling with autonomy.
....aaaand I was proven correct.
Yeah, this place is a collectivist hivemind on levels that make TC look bustling with autonomy.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,542
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 31 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,543
figures. i should have assumed as much, OP.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #450,544
@450,542 (E)
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Overwhelming autism that makes me appear negrotypical, I swear.
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Overwhelming autism that makes me appear negrotypical, I swear.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #450,588
> her
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #450,596
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 7 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #450,624
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #450,658
@450,588 (G)
Dude, if someone IDs as a woman, they're kinda a woman, just saying. Gender is identity, not biology.
Dude, if someone IDs as a woman, they're kinda a woman, just saying. Gender is identity, not biology.
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw replied with this 13 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,712
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,714
@previous (Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw)
Erasing someone's identity due to antiquated narratives of what gender is isn't a valid personal choice.
Here's an experiment you can try at home - cut off your dick. You're still male, aren't you? Cut off your balls. You're still male, aren't you? Get a vagina added to yourself surgically. You're still male, aren't you? Get breast implants. You're still male, aren't you? "But chromosomes!", you say. Yes, and? There are cis women born with an X and a Y - insensitive to androgens, they are assigned female at birth, and, most often, grow up to be totally fine with their female assignment. There have been cases recorded of XY babies with penises having their genitalia surgically inverted and being assigned female due to their dick being tiny - and then, surprise surprise, growing up to be a trans man because they weren't suited towards their assigned gender!
What I'm saying is that you should not be enabling the "gender is biology" crowd. It's patently irresponsible, enormously problematic, and plain fucking wrong.
Erasing someone's identity due to antiquated narratives of what gender is isn't a valid personal choice.
Here's an experiment you can try at home - cut off your dick. You're still male, aren't you? Cut off your balls. You're still male, aren't you? Get a vagina added to yourself surgically. You're still male, aren't you? Get breast implants. You're still male, aren't you? "But chromosomes!", you say. Yes, and? There are cis women born with an X and a Y - insensitive to androgens, they are assigned female at birth, and, most often, grow up to be totally fine with their female assignment. There have been cases recorded of XY babies with penises having their genitalia surgically inverted and being assigned female due to their dick being tiny - and then, surprise surprise, growing up to be a trans man because they weren't suited towards their assigned gender!
What I'm saying is that you should not be enabling the "gender is biology" crowd. It's patently irresponsible, enormously problematic, and plain fucking wrong.
merriam-webster replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,716
gen·der
noun \ˈjen-dər\
: the state of being male or female
grammar : one of the categories (masculine, feminine, and neuter) into which words (such as nouns, adjectives, and pronouns) are divided in many languages
noun \ˈjen-dər\
: the state of being male or female
grammar : one of the categories (masculine, feminine, and neuter) into which words (such as nouns, adjectives, and pronouns) are divided in many languages
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,717
@previous (merriam-webster)
Nah bro. Binary gender doesn't work. Put your dictionary down and listen to people who aren't binary cis.
Nah bro. Binary gender doesn't work. Put your dictionary down and listen to people who aren't binary cis.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,718
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
they're all fucked in the head. some are fuckable, some are not.
they're all fucked in the head. some are fuckable, some are not.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,719
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Thing is, they're not fucked in the head. The fucked part is society's imposition of binary gender upon people for whom it simply doesn't work.
Thing is, they're not fucked in the head. The fucked part is society's imposition of binary gender upon people for whom it simply doesn't work.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,731
@450,714 (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
Nice deconstructivism. Nobody who's sane and not a SJW cares.
Your argument, btw, inadvertently proves the opposition, not you. Both those cases you've outlined prove the biological preponderence of hormonal influences on gender-identity; the androgen-insensitive girls had femalewhore brains DUE TO A LACK OF TESTOSTERONE EXPOSURE and so were fine with their assignment. Perhaps there might be minimal chromosomal contribution in "gender identity," I can't be 100% certain, what I do know is that they affect developmental patterns making their influence on hormones inevitable, thus solidifying "gender identity." (I hate that term, it was invented by Frankfurt communists under Hirschfield; please, just stick to sex and ignore the woo-woos who need their heads checked.)
Nice deconstructivism. Nobody who's sane and not a SJW cares.
Your argument, btw, inadvertently proves the opposition, not you. Both those cases you've outlined prove the biological preponderence of hormonal influences on gender-identity; the androgen-insensitive girls had femalewhore brains DUE TO A LACK OF TESTOSTERONE EXPOSURE and so were fine with their assignment. Perhaps there might be minimal chromosomal contribution in "gender identity," I can't be 100% certain, what I do know is that they affect developmental patterns making their influence on hormones inevitable, thus solidifying "gender identity." (I hate that term, it was invented by Frankfurt communists under Hirschfield; please, just stick to sex and ignore the woo-woos who need their heads checked.)
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g double-posted this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,732
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,736
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,743
@previous (K)
Okay, Yagoda.
Such heroism are the Jewish psychopath's warcrimes committed under the auspices of Judeo-Soviet-essentialist-denialism. You probably even think the Bolsheviks were a legitimately Slavic phenomenon. Ahahahaha. What a churl.
Okay, Yagoda.
Such heroism are the Jewish psychopath's warcrimes committed under the auspices of Judeo-Soviet-essentialist-denialism. You probably even think the Bolsheviks were a legitimately Slavic phenomenon. Ahahahaha. What a churl.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,748
@450,731 (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Yep, confirmed for violent reactionary.
@450,732 (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Look, I actually know people who aren't binary. They exist. Hate to say it, but they do.
Also, non-binary genitalia. There is no Boolean penis/vagina switch in our genes.
But seriously, you're why it's a damn fucking shame that there're no Gulags.
Yep, confirmed for violent reactionary.
@450,732 (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Look, I actually know people who aren't binary. They exist. Hate to say it, but they do.
Also, non-binary genitalia. There is no Boolean penis/vagina switch in our genes.
But seriously, you're why it's a damn fucking shame that there're no Gulags.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,751
good lord autphag, you can't stop talking about transsexuals even on another board.
take your love of shemales back to tinychan, it's like all you ever talk about.
no one cares if you love shemales or not! just go suck their dicks and get over it.
take your love of shemales back to tinychan, it's like all you ever talk about.
no one cares if you love shemales or not! just go suck their dicks and get over it.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,765
@450,748 (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
They're very rare and their existence does not logically follow onto those having intact chromosomes being able to claim all kinds of suffixes and prefixes of identity, that's just insane, and runs counter to biology. You make it a shame that National Socialism still isn't purging the scourge of Marxism throughout our continent.
They're very rare and their existence does not logically follow onto those having intact chromosomes being able to claim all kinds of suffixes and prefixes of identity, that's just insane, and runs counter to biology. You make it a shame that National Socialism still isn't purging the scourge of Marxism throughout our continent.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,801
@previous (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Dude, can you stop fucking enshrining social constructions as being "biology" when you know full fucking well that nature doesn't fucking make neat little categories? Categorisation is constructed. Nature doesn't categorise. Nature merely happens.
Dude, can you stop fucking enshrining social constructions as being "biology" when you know full fucking well that nature doesn't fucking make neat little categories? Categorisation is constructed. Nature doesn't categorise. Nature merely happens.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,812
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
Nature categorizes itself, otherwise these manifestations wouldn't be observed empirically; stop trying to deny the impartiality of natural observation by claiming (as you have, albeit however tacitly) science to be some kind of anti-communist conspiracy. Cheers.
Nature categorizes itself, otherwise these manifestations wouldn't be observed empirically; stop trying to deny the impartiality of natural observation by claiming (as you have, albeit however tacitly) science to be some kind of anti-communist conspiracy. Cheers.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 51 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,845
@previous (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
ahahhahahahahhahahabahahhahavsjchdhkdjfkwjffnshfkje
HOLY FUCK DUDE
YOUR FUCKING ESSENTIALISM ISN'T FUCKING SCIENCE
It's eloquent bigotry, not science. Two Simultaneous Gender Cube isn't science, it's projection of Western norms upon nature to suit the existing heterocisnormative establishment. Gender and sex binaries are empirical when you erase the 10% of ''actual human beings'" who don't perfectly meet it - the ones who have their genitalia altered immediately after birth to be less "ambiguous" to sexually binary society.
You need to stop portraying vicious, violent, crushing, destructive, murderous normativity as "nature". You need to accept it as social construction.
Stop. Enshrining. Construction. As. Nature. Namaste.
ahahhahahahahhahahabahahhahavsjchdhkdjfkwjffnshfkje
HOLY FUCK DUDE
YOUR FUCKING ESSENTIALISM ISN'T FUCKING SCIENCE
It's eloquent bigotry, not science. Two Simultaneous Gender Cube isn't science, it's projection of Western norms upon nature to suit the existing heterocisnormative establishment. Gender and sex binaries are empirical when you erase the 10% of ''actual human beings'" who don't perfectly meet it - the ones who have their genitalia altered immediately after birth to be less "ambiguous" to sexually binary society.
You need to stop portraying vicious, violent, crushing, destructive, murderous normativity as "nature". You need to accept it as social construction.
Stop. Enshrining. Construction. As. Nature. Namaste.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,854
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
You're the one exhibiting race-essentialism though, hypocritically praising negroids for exhibiting their barbarous nature for "that's simply how they are, isn't it pwecious?!? ;_;", while lying about colonial exploits by dismissing it as an aggressive expression of imperialist violence that calls for the White man's galding and debasing.
Eloquent air is the pseudoscience of social deconstructivism. Please, take your pseudopolemic pomobabble back to revleft where it'll be accepted uncritically for the glitter-embellished garbage it has been worked up into a magic totem-pole of elucidation.
You're the one exhibiting race-essentialism though, hypocritically praising negroids for exhibiting their barbarous nature for "that's simply how they are, isn't it pwecious?!? ;_;", while lying about colonial exploits by dismissing it as an aggressive expression of imperialist violence that calls for the White man's galding and debasing.
Eloquent air is the pseudoscience of social deconstructivism. Please, take your pseudopolemic pomobabble back to revleft where it'll be accepted uncritically for the glitter-embellished garbage it has been worked up into a magic totem-pole of elucidation.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,859
@previous (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
hahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhaha Holy shit, dude, stop trying to project your racism onto other people. 8D
hahahahahahahhahahahahhahahhaha Holy shit, dude, stop trying to project your racism onto other people. 8D
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,863
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
> All I have remaining is a heartily contemptuous defense mechanism to laugh my butthurt away! Go me, I can master emotionally suggestive manipulation of others to feel stupid if they disagree with me!
Yeah it's not going to work, you've shown yourself to be a conceited moron on more than one occasion.
> All I have remaining is a heartily contemptuous defense mechanism to laugh my butthurt away! Go me, I can master emotionally suggestive manipulation of others to feel stupid if they disagree with me!
Yeah it's not going to work, you've shown yourself to be a conceited moron on more than one occasion.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,865
@previous (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
I'll admit it - I'm manipulative at times, and I'm more than glad to pull out the emotional attacks on fascists. Look - I have a problem with you, your ideology, and everyone who subscribes to your ideology. Y'all are complicit in or in support of essentially every last bit of exploitation on the planet, and I'm not gonna tolerate that ideology. Anywhere.
I'm not gonna be a nice little liberal (per Mao's definition) and be tolerant of Nazism.
I'll admit it - I'm manipulative at times, and I'm more than glad to pull out the emotional attacks on fascists. Look - I have a problem with you, your ideology, and everyone who subscribes to your ideology. Y'all are complicit in or in support of essentially every last bit of exploitation on the planet, and I'm not gonna tolerate that ideology. Anywhere.
I'm not gonna be a nice little liberal (per Mao's definition) and be tolerant of Nazism.
Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,867
@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
> reads Mao
WOW, YOU ARE A CARICATURE. I bet you're friends with Ahuviya Harel.
> reads Mao
WOW, YOU ARE A CARICATURE. I bet you're friends with Ahuviya Harel.
decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #450,874
@previous (Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Surprisingly, I'm not.
Combat Liberalism is the only Mao I've ever bothered to read.
Surprisingly, I'm not.
Combat Liberalism is the only Mao I've ever bothered to read.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 12 years ago, 8 months later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #487,527
bump
Autphag !AsqEkddp5c replied with this 12 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #487,560
Ignore the opposition in "gender identity," I can't be might be might be minimal chromosomal contribution in "gender identity," I can't be might be 100% certain, what I do know is their influence on gender-identity." (I hate the biological patterns making "gender identity," I can't be minimal contribution, not you. Both the woo-woos who's sane and ignore that term, it was invented by Frankfurt communists underence of hormonal influences on hormones inevitable, thus solidifying "gender.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)