Minichan

Topic: Why is it that whenever you have 1 of these subjects in a thread the other 2 bound to come up?

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #32,085

For example, a thread that starts discussing the transgender community may eventually see an opposing party made up of white supremacists where it's later joined by modern feminists.

It doesn't even have to be in that order either. It seems whenever you have 1 you get the other 2.

All 3 seem to be at war with each other and sometimes 2 of them merge into a 4th which would be transfeminism.

All 4 also seem to have an accelerated version of Godwin's Law too.

squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #449,614

first

decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 55 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #449,622

I think it's because white supremacists and TERFs can agree on bashing people who refute sex/gender binary essentialism.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,807

@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
TERFs?

decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,808

@previous (A)
Trans-excluding radical feminist. Basically, second-wave feminists that hate trans women and continually try to highjack trans men as a political talking point for their transphobic rhetoric.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,811

@previous (decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj)
What would first and third wave feminism be?

Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,814

@previous (A)
(Grossly over-simplified version)
1st wave: women seeking equal rights to vote, get divorce, etc.
2nd wave: bra-burning unshaven 1970s feminists
3rd wave: girl power, that Jezebel blog

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,815

@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
What could fourth wave feminism look like?

Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,817

@previous (A)
Chaz Bono

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #449,818

@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Char the Butcher?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #450,060

It's because cisgendered persons accept a socially constructed obligation to live in one gender role or the other based upon their birth sex.

The biggest intellectual threat of transgenderism lies in it's logical and thoughtful challenge to the idea of involuntary social obligations by way of coercive traditions. This is why your White Supremacists and your Feminists show up in groves to challenge transgenderism. Both those groups are proponents of "a social contract" imposing involuntary obligations on others.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.