Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: If you had the power to kill endlessly without ever getting caught...

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #32,084

Would you use your ability?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes. 18 86%
No. 3 14%

TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #449,598

Probably, so I pressed yes.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #449,600

Yes. I would use it to kill that fungal infection on Ash's hand.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 42 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #449,601

I voted "no" on a poll like this awhile back, now I voted "yes".

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

doctor dw md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #449,604

i would probably use it to make people think i am psychic.

decibelmilliwatts !!8lSAEPzaj joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #449,619

It'd be ridiculously improbable that someone wouldn't suspect me.

The End !z3ClNrSF8g joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #449,663

Of course

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #449,689

@449,600 (C)

hi its not fungus thanks

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #449,927

deathnote.jpg

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 12 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #449,990

Would this require actual endless killing to keep not getting caught, or is it fine to just kill someone every few years and leave it at that?

(Edited 27 seconds later.)

TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #449,992

@previous (J)
Yeah this. If I could kill only whenever I chose I'd do it.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #449,997

@449,990 (J)
It doesn't require endless killing.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 17 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #450,073

Do I have to actually kill or can it be something stealthy like giving them a heart attack with an undetectable electromagnetic pulse? If it's the first one, I doubt I'd ever want to get all bloody and watch someone scream and carry on as if they were being murdered. But if it's the second I'm sure I'd use it all the time.

I like to think mainly I'd use it mainly in cases where the good of the many outweighs the good of the few. Say killing a known rapist or child molester. But of course I'd also use it to gain power and advantage for myself. "What's that, the boss is looking to downsize?" Bye, bye, boss man. "Oh shit, I'm getting pulled over." Dead men can't write tickets.

So really I guess it all comes down to how easy is it to kill. I guess if you can make it easy enough I'd get on board, but simply removing the possibility of punishment doesn't deliver the absolute convenience I'd require to feel numb about doing it.

Good question though.

(Edited 43 seconds later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.