Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#448,033
inb4 mad
Triptych !IupsXZPnnU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#448,035
of course it's legal
it just isn't ethical
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 44 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#448,036
Depends on which state you're in.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 10 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#448,037
@448,033 (B)
No, just legibility curious. Seems as if that would be considered illegal.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 36 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#448,038
@448,035 (Triptych !IupsXZPnnU) > not ethical for a business to try and stay afloat in a competitive economy
Oh, okay.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#448,053
@previous (E)
Discussing ethics is like nailing jello to the wall.
A lot of businesses are starting to be more socially responsible now even if just to expand brand awareness.
So something like this might be considered unethical.
Anonymous E replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#448,058
@previous (A)
"Corporate social responsibility" is a marketing move, and it is a function of the affluence of it's clientele.